Suppr超能文献

医生在协助死亡中应扮演何种角色?对六个欧洲国家法律法规及医学专业立场的分析。

A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries.

作者信息

Bosshard G, Broeckaert B, Clark D, Materstvedt L J, Gordijn B, Müller-Busch H C

机构信息

Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2008 Jan;34(1):28-32. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.018911.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyse legislation and medical professional positions concerning the doctor's role in assisted dying in western Europe, and to discuss their implications for doctors.

METHOD

This paper is based on country-specific reports by experts from European countries where assisted dying is legalised (Belgium, The Netherlands), or openly practiced (Switzerland), or where it is illegal (Germany, Norway, UK).

RESULTS

Laws on assisted dying in The Netherlands and Belgium are restricted to doctors. In principle, assisted suicide (but not euthanasia) is not illegal in either Germany or Switzerland, but a doctor's participation in Germany would violate the code of professional medical conduct and might contravene of a doctor's legal duty to save life. The Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill proposed in the UK in 2005 focused on doctors, whereas the Proposal on Assisted Dying of the Norwegian Penal Code Commission minority in 2002 did not. Professional medical organisations in all these countries except The Netherlands maintain the position that medical assistance in dying conflicts with the basic role of doctors. However, in Belgium and Switzerland, and for a time in the UK, these organisations dropped their opposition to new legislation. Today, they regard the issue as primarily a matter for society and politics. This "neutral" stance differs from the official position of the Royal Dutch Medical Association which has played a key role in developing the Dutch practice of euthanasia as a "medical end-of-life decision" since the 1970s.

CONCLUSION

A society moving towards an open approach to assisted dying should carefully identify tasks to assign exclusively to medical doctors, and distinguish those possibly better performed by other professions.

摘要

目的

分析西欧有关医生在协助死亡中角色的立法及医学专业立场,并探讨其对医生的影响。

方法

本文基于来自欧洲国家的专家提供的国别报告,这些国家中协助死亡已合法化(比利时、荷兰),或公开实行(瑞士);或为非法(德国、挪威、英国)。

结果

荷兰和比利时有关协助死亡的法律仅限于医生。原则上,在德国和瑞士,协助自杀(但非安乐死)均不违法,但医生在德国参与协助自杀将违反医学专业行为准则,且可能违背医生挽救生命的法定义务。英国2005年提出的《晚期病人协助死亡法案》聚焦于医生,而挪威刑法委员会少数派在2002年提出的《协助死亡提案》则未涉及。除荷兰外,所有这些国家的医学专业组织均坚持认为,医疗协助死亡与医生的基本角色相冲突。然而,在比利时和瑞士,以及英国曾有一段时间,这些组织放弃了对新立法的反对。如今,它们将此问题主要视为社会和政治事务。这种“中立”立场不同于荷兰皇家医学协会的官方立场,自20世纪70年代以来,该协会在将荷兰的安乐死实践发展为“医疗临终决定”方面发挥了关键作用。

结论

一个朝着对协助死亡采取开放态度发展的社会,应谨慎确定专门分配给医生的任务,并区分那些可能由其他专业更好完成的任务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验