Zahedi Farzaneh, Larijani Bagher
Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Centre, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre, Medical Sciences/University of Tehran.
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2009 May 31;2:6. Print 2009.
Judgment on rightness and wrongness of beliefs and behaviors is a main issue in bioethics. Over centuries, big philosophers and ethicists have been discussing the suitable tools to determine which act is morally sound and which one is not. Emerging the contemporary bioethics in the West has resulted in a misconception that absolute westernized principles would be appropriate tools for ethical decision making in different cultures. We will discuss this issue by introducing a clinical case. Considering various cultural beliefs around the world, though it is not logical to consider all of them ethically acceptable, we can gather on some general fundamental principles instead of going to the extremes of relativism and absolutism. Islamic teachings, according to the presented evidence in this paper, fall in with this idea.
对信仰和行为的是非判断是生物伦理学中的一个主要问题。几个世纪以来,伟大的哲学家和伦理学家一直在讨论合适的工具,以确定哪种行为在道德上是合理的,哪种行为不是。当代西方生物伦理学的出现导致了一种误解,即绝对西化的原则将是不同文化中伦理决策的合适工具。我们将通过引入一个临床案例来讨论这个问题。考虑到世界各地的各种文化信仰,虽然认为所有这些信仰在伦理上都可以接受是不合逻辑的,但我们可以就一些普遍的基本原则达成共识,而不是走向相对主义和绝对主义的极端。根据本文所提供的证据,伊斯兰教教义符合这一观点。