Suppr超能文献

当代生物伦理学的人类学探索:常识的多样性

An anthropological exploration of contemporary bioethics: the varieties of common sense.

作者信息

Turner L

机构信息

Hastings Center, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1998 Apr;24(2):127-33. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.2.127.

Abstract

Patients and physicians can inhabit distinctive social worlds where they are guided by diverse understandings of moral practice. Despite the contemporary presence of multiple moral traditions, religious communities and ethnic backgrounds, two of the major methodological approaches in bioethics, casuistry and principlism, rely upon the notion of a common morality. However, the heterogeneity of ethnic, moral, and religious traditions raises questions concerning the singularity of common sense. Indeed, it might be more appropriate to consider plural traditions of moral reasoning. This poses a considerable challenge for bioethicists because the existence of plural moral traditions can lead to difficulties regarding "closure" in moral reasoning. The topics of truth-telling, informed consent, euthanasia, and brain death and organ transplantation reveal the presence of different understandings of common sense. With regard to these subjects, plural accounts of "common sense" moral reasoning exist.

摘要

患者和医生可能身处独特的社会世界,在那里他们受对道德实践的不同理解所引导。尽管当代存在多种道德传统、宗教团体和种族背景,但生物伦理学的两种主要方法论——决疑法和原则主义,都依赖于共同道德的概念。然而,种族、道德和宗教传统的异质性引发了关于常识单一性的问题。的确,考虑道德推理的多元传统可能更为合适。这给生物伦理学家带来了相当大的挑战,因为多元道德传统的存在可能导致道德推理中“结论”方面的困难。如实告知、知情同意、安乐死、脑死亡及器官移植等话题揭示了对常识存在不同理解。关于这些主题,存在对“常识”道德推理的多元解释。

相似文献

2
Anthropology and bioethics.人类学与生物伦理学。
Med Anthropol Q. 1992 Mar;6(1):49-73. doi: 10.1525/maq.1992.6.1.02a00040.
9
'Bioethics' is subordinate to morality in Japan.在日本,“生物伦理学”从属于道德范畴。
Bioethics. 1996 Jul;10(3):201-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1996.tb00119.x.

引用本文的文献

2
Bioethics policies and the compass of common morality.生物伦理学政策与普遍道德准则
Theor Med Bioeth. 2009;30(1):31-43. doi: 10.1007/s11017-009-9094-4.
3
The ground of dialogical bioethics.对话生物伦理学的基础。
Health Care Anal. 2002;10(4):391-402. doi: 10.1023/A:1023431310918.
4
On autonomy and identity.论自主性与身份认同。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):414. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.414.

本文引用的文献

1
Moral reasoning in social context.社会背景下的道德推理。
J Soc Issues. 1993 Summer;49(2):185-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1993.tb00927.x.
3
Unlimited human autonomy - a cultural bias?无限的人类自主性——一种文化偏见?
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 27;336(13):954-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703273361312.
5
Cultural aspects of nondisclosure.保密的文化层面。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Summer;3(3):338-46. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100005156.
9
Medical ethics in cross-cultural and multi-cultural perspectives.
Soc Sci Med Med Anthropol. 1980 Nov;14B(4):289-96. doi: 10.1016/0160-7987(80)90054-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验