Turner L
Hastings Center, New York, USA.
J Med Ethics. 1998 Apr;24(2):127-33. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.2.127.
Patients and physicians can inhabit distinctive social worlds where they are guided by diverse understandings of moral practice. Despite the contemporary presence of multiple moral traditions, religious communities and ethnic backgrounds, two of the major methodological approaches in bioethics, casuistry and principlism, rely upon the notion of a common morality. However, the heterogeneity of ethnic, moral, and religious traditions raises questions concerning the singularity of common sense. Indeed, it might be more appropriate to consider plural traditions of moral reasoning. This poses a considerable challenge for bioethicists because the existence of plural moral traditions can lead to difficulties regarding "closure" in moral reasoning. The topics of truth-telling, informed consent, euthanasia, and brain death and organ transplantation reveal the presence of different understandings of common sense. With regard to these subjects, plural accounts of "common sense" moral reasoning exist.
患者和医生可能身处独特的社会世界,在那里他们受对道德实践的不同理解所引导。尽管当代存在多种道德传统、宗教团体和种族背景,但生物伦理学的两种主要方法论——决疑法和原则主义,都依赖于共同道德的概念。然而,种族、道德和宗教传统的异质性引发了关于常识单一性的问题。的确,考虑道德推理的多元传统可能更为合适。这给生物伦理学家带来了相当大的挑战,因为多元道德传统的存在可能导致道德推理中“结论”方面的困难。如实告知、知情同意、安乐死、脑死亡及器官移植等话题揭示了对常识存在不同理解。关于这些主题,存在对“常识”道德推理的多元解释。