Zahedi Farzaneh
MD, Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 5th floor, Shariati Hospital, North Kargar Avenue, Tehran 14114-13137, Iran, Tel: (+98 21) 88220037-8, , Email:
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2011 Dec 27;4:11. Print 2011.
Accompanied with various opinions across cultures, truth telling is a major debate in bioethics. Many studies have focused on attitudes toward truth disclosure. We intend to review several relevant research studies, and discuss the issue through a clinical case consultation. It seems that while "the right to know" is emphasized in bioethics, in some cultural contexts, health professionals fear communicating bad news. The patients may not receive information directly, because it is believed that the truth may make the patient feel hopeless and unable to cope with the problem. Nevertheless, some believe that sharing information may strengthen a trusting relationship between patients and medical professionals. Extensive efforts are in process in some societies to make patient rights to know the truth as a natural part of medical practice. However, in some cases, the principles of respect for patient autonomy require us to accept patient's refusal to know the truth, with the provision that he assigns someone to receive information and make medical decisions on his behalf. In conclusion, it is suggested that healthcare professionals should not act on a unique presumption in all cases and they should explore what the real interest of patient is, in order to respect individual autonomy.
伴随着跨文化的各种观点,告知真相是生物伦理学中的一个主要争论点。许多研究都集中在对真相披露的态度上。我们打算回顾几项相关的研究,并通过一个临床病例会诊来讨论这个问题。似乎在生物伦理学中强调“知情权”的同时,在某些文化背景下,医疗专业人员害怕传达坏消息。患者可能无法直接获得信息,因为人们认为真相可能会让患者感到绝望且无法应对问题。然而,有些人认为分享信息可能会加强患者与医疗专业人员之间的信任关系。一些社会正在做出广泛努力,将患者了解真相的权利作为医疗实践的自然组成部分。然而,在某些情况下,尊重患者自主权的原则要求我们接受患者拒绝了解真相,但前提是他指定某人代表他接收信息并做出医疗决策。总之,建议医疗保健专业人员不应在所有情况下都基于单一假设行事,而应探索患者的真正利益所在,以尊重个人自主权。