Wiggans K Tomo, Vernau William, Lappin Michael R, Thomasy Sara M, Maggs David J
College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Vet Ophthalmol. 2014 May;17(3):212-20. doi: 10.1111/vop.12075. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
To evaluate diagnostic utility of aqueous humor analysis in animals with anterior uveitis.
Client-owned dogs (n = 12) and cats (n = 10).
Examination findings and diagnostic test results including aqueous humor cytology were compared.
Disease duration prior to aqueocentesis was not significantly different between dogs with idiopathic anterior uveitis and those with an etiologic diagnosis, but was shorter in cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) than those with idiopathic uveitis. Microbial nucleic acids, antigens, or antibodies against them were seldom found in blood/serum; however, serum feline coronavirus titers ≥1:6400 were detected only in cats with FIP. Aqueous humor cytology was diagnostic in no cats and two dogs, both with neoplasia. Although aqueous humor contained predominantly neutrophils in cats with FIP and large reactive lymphocytes and plasma cells appeared more frequent in cats with idiopathic uveitis, neither clinical nor cytologic assessment of anterior chamber contents differed significantly between cats with idiopathic or FIP-associated uveitis. Cytologically assessed plasma cell number was correlated with keratic precipitates and disease duration. Clinically detectable hyphema and cytologic erythrocyte number were correlated. However, cytologic cell grades and clinical grade of flare or cell numbers within the anterior chamber were not correlated.
Aqueous humor cytology permitted diagnosis of neoplasia in dogs with anterior uveitis but was generally not helpful in cats. Poor correlation between clinical and cytologic assessment of cell numbers and type within the anterior chamber dictates that clinical grading should not be the sole criterion for electing to perform aqueocentesis.
评估房水分析在患有前葡萄膜炎动物中的诊断效用。
客户拥有的犬(n = 12)和猫(n = 10)。
比较检查结果和诊断测试结果,包括房水细胞学检查结果。
特发性前葡萄膜炎犬与病因明确的犬在进行前房穿刺术之前的病程无显著差异,但猫传染性腹膜炎(FIP)猫的病程比特发性葡萄膜炎猫的病程短。血液/血清中很少发现微生物核酸、抗原或针对它们的抗体;然而,仅在患有FIP的猫中检测到血清猫冠状病毒滴度≥1:6400。房水细胞学检查对猫均无诊断价值,对两只患有肿瘤的犬具有诊断价值。虽然FIP猫的房水中主要含有中性粒细胞,特发性葡萄膜炎猫中大型反应性淋巴细胞和浆细胞出现得更频繁,但特发性或FIP相关性葡萄膜炎猫的前房内容物的临床评估和细胞学评估均无显著差异。细胞学评估的浆细胞数量与角膜后沉着物和病程相关。临床可检测到的前房积血与细胞学红细胞数量相关。然而,细胞学细胞分级与前房内炎症闪光的临床分级或细胞数量无关。
房水细胞学检查可诊断患有前葡萄膜炎犬的肿瘤,但对猫一般无帮助。前房内细胞数量和类型的临床评估与细胞学评估之间相关性较差,这表明临床分级不应作为选择进行前房穿刺术的唯一标准。