Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.
Vet Microbiol. 2013 Oct 25;166(3-4):450-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
The probability of detecting influenza A virus (IAV) by virus isolation (VI), point-of-care (POC) antigen detection, and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was estimated for pen-based oral fluid (OF) and individual pig nasal swab (NS) specimens. Piglets (n=82) were isolated for 30 days and confirmed negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, and IAV infections. A subset (n=28) was vaccinated on day post inoculation (DPI) -42 and -21 with a commercial multivalent vaccine. On DPI 0, pigs were intratracheally inoculated with contemporary isolates of H1N1 (n=35) or H3N2 (n=35) or served as negative controls (n=12). OF (n=370) was collected DPI 0-16 and NS (n=924) DPI 0-6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16. The association between IAV detection and variables of interest (specimen, virus subtype, assay, vaccination status, and DPI) was analyzed by mixed-effect repeated measures logistic regression and the results used to calculate the probability (pˆ) of detecting IAV in OF and NS over DPI by assay. Vaccination (p-value<0.0001), DPI (p-value<0.0001), and specimen-assay interaction (p-value<0.0001) were significant to IAV detection, but virus subtype was not (p-value=0.89). Vaccination and/or increasing DPI reduced pˆ for all assays. VI was more successful using NS than OF, but both VI and POC were generally unsuccessful after DPI 6. Overall, rRT-PCR on OF specimens provided the highest pˆ for the most DPIs, yet significantly different results were observed between the two laboratories independently performing rRT-PCR testing.
基于笔式口腔液(OF)和个体猪鼻拭子(NS)标本,评估了病毒分离(VI)、即时检测(POC)抗原检测和实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)检测甲型流感病毒(IAV)的概率。将仔猪(n=82)隔离 30 天,并确认其无猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒、支原体肺炎和 IAV 感染。其中一部分(n=28)在接种前 42 天和 21 天接种了商业多价疫苗。在接种后 0 天(DPI),通过气管内接种了具有当前流行的 H1N1(n=35)或 H3N2(n=35)的分离株,或作为阴性对照(n=12)。在 DPI 0-16 天采集 OF(n=370),在 DPI 0-6、8、10、12、14、16 天采集 NS(n=924)。通过混合效应重复测量逻辑回归分析 IAV 检测与感兴趣的变量(标本、病毒亚型、检测方法、疫苗接种状态和 DPI)之间的关系,并使用该结果计算通过检测方法在 DPI 期间 OF 和 NS 中检测到 IAV 的概率(pˆ)。疫苗接种(p 值<0.0001)、DPI(p 值<0.0001)和标本-检测方法相互作用(p 值<0.0001)对 IAV 检测具有显著影响,但病毒亚型没有(p 值=0.89)。疫苗接种和/或增加 DPI 降低了所有检测方法的 pˆ。VI 使用 NS 比 OF 更成功,但在 DPI 6 之后,VI 和 POC 通常都不成功。总体而言,基于 OF 标本的 rRT-PCR 检测在大多数 DPI 期间提供了最高的 pˆ,但在两个独立进行 rRT-PCR 检测的实验室中,观察到了显著不同的结果。