Suppr超能文献

随时间变化检测个体猪鼻拭子和基于笔的口腔液标本中甲型流感病毒亚型 H1N1 和 H3N2 的概率。

Probability of detecting influenza A virus subtypes H1N1 and H3N2 in individual pig nasal swabs and pen-based oral fluid specimens over time.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA.

出版信息

Vet Microbiol. 2013 Oct 25;166(3-4):450-60. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.029. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

Abstract

The probability of detecting influenza A virus (IAV) by virus isolation (VI), point-of-care (POC) antigen detection, and real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was estimated for pen-based oral fluid (OF) and individual pig nasal swab (NS) specimens. Piglets (n=82) were isolated for 30 days and confirmed negative for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, and IAV infections. A subset (n=28) was vaccinated on day post inoculation (DPI) -42 and -21 with a commercial multivalent vaccine. On DPI 0, pigs were intratracheally inoculated with contemporary isolates of H1N1 (n=35) or H3N2 (n=35) or served as negative controls (n=12). OF (n=370) was collected DPI 0-16 and NS (n=924) DPI 0-6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16. The association between IAV detection and variables of interest (specimen, virus subtype, assay, vaccination status, and DPI) was analyzed by mixed-effect repeated measures logistic regression and the results used to calculate the probability (pˆ) of detecting IAV in OF and NS over DPI by assay. Vaccination (p-value<0.0001), DPI (p-value<0.0001), and specimen-assay interaction (p-value<0.0001) were significant to IAV detection, but virus subtype was not (p-value=0.89). Vaccination and/or increasing DPI reduced pˆ for all assays. VI was more successful using NS than OF, but both VI and POC were generally unsuccessful after DPI 6. Overall, rRT-PCR on OF specimens provided the highest pˆ for the most DPIs, yet significantly different results were observed between the two laboratories independently performing rRT-PCR testing.

摘要

基于笔式口腔液(OF)和个体猪鼻拭子(NS)标本,评估了病毒分离(VI)、即时检测(POC)抗原检测和实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(rRT-PCR)检测甲型流感病毒(IAV)的概率。将仔猪(n=82)隔离 30 天,并确认其无猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒、支原体肺炎和 IAV 感染。其中一部分(n=28)在接种前 42 天和 21 天接种了商业多价疫苗。在接种后 0 天(DPI),通过气管内接种了具有当前流行的 H1N1(n=35)或 H3N2(n=35)的分离株,或作为阴性对照(n=12)。在 DPI 0-16 天采集 OF(n=370),在 DPI 0-6、8、10、12、14、16 天采集 NS(n=924)。通过混合效应重复测量逻辑回归分析 IAV 检测与感兴趣的变量(标本、病毒亚型、检测方法、疫苗接种状态和 DPI)之间的关系,并使用该结果计算通过检测方法在 DPI 期间 OF 和 NS 中检测到 IAV 的概率(pˆ)。疫苗接种(p 值<0.0001)、DPI(p 值<0.0001)和标本-检测方法相互作用(p 值<0.0001)对 IAV 检测具有显著影响,但病毒亚型没有(p 值=0.89)。疫苗接种和/或增加 DPI 降低了所有检测方法的 pˆ。VI 使用 NS 比 OF 更成功,但在 DPI 6 之后,VI 和 POC 通常都不成功。总体而言,基于 OF 标本的 rRT-PCR 检测在大多数 DPI 期间提供了最高的 pˆ,但在两个独立进行 rRT-PCR 检测的实验室中,观察到了显著不同的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验