Chong Qing Reproductive and Genetic Institute, Chong Qing Obstetric and Gynecology Hospital, 64 Jing Tang ST, Yu Zhong District, Chong Qing 400013, China.
Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Nov-Dec;19(6):685-95. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt036. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
BACKGROUND Conflicting results have been reported regarding the technique of brief insemination used in IVF. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine if better clinical outcomes of IVF are associated with a brief co-incubation of gametes than with a standard overnight co-incubation. METHODS A computerized search was conducted of the published literature of four databases, using search terms related to gamete, time of co-incubation and outcome measure. Eligible studies compared outcomes of IVF with a brief co-incubation of gametes to that of a control group of standard insemination and reported rates of live birth (primary outcome), normal fertilization, polyspermy, good quality embryos, implantation, clinical pregnancy or ongoing pregnancy (secondary outcomes). A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the data. Statistical heterogeneity was tested using Cochran Q and I² values. RESULTS Brief co-incubation of gametes was associated with significantly higher rates of clinical pregnancy (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.24-2.73) and ongoing pregnancy (RR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.27-2.33) than standard insemination. Brief co-incubation of gametes was associated also with a significantly higher rate of implantation (RR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.43-2.26) than standard insemination. However, the rates of normal fertilization (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.02), good quality embryos (RR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.0-1.53) and polyspermy (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.7-1.01) were not significantly different with brief co-incubation of gametes compared with standard insemination. CONCLUSIONS Reduced gamete exposure time may be associated with beneficial outcomes. Drawbacks inherent to the quality of several studies limit the quality of the available evidence. Adequately powered randomized controlled studies need to be performed to evaluate the efficacy of brief insemination.
关于 IVF 中使用的短暂授精技术,已有相互矛盾的结果报告。本荟萃分析的目的是确定与标准过夜共孵育相比,配子的短暂共孵育是否与 IVF 的更好临床结局相关。
使用与配子、共孵育时间和结局测量相关的检索词,对四个数据库的已发表文献进行计算机检索。符合条件的研究将短暂共孵育配子的 IVF 结果与标准授精的对照组进行比较,并报告活产率(主要结局)、正常受精、多精受精、优质胚胎、着床、临床妊娠或持续妊娠(次要结局)的发生率。共有 11 项研究纳入荟萃分析。计算数据的汇总风险比 (RR) 和 95%置信区间 (CI)。使用 Cochran Q 和 I² 值检验统计异质性。
与标准授精相比,短暂共孵育配子与更高的临床妊娠率(RR:1.84,95%CI:1.24-2.73)和持续妊娠率(RR:1.73,95%CI:1.27-2.33)相关。短暂共孵育配子也与更高的着床率(RR:1.80,95%CI:1.43-2.26)相关,高于标准授精。然而,正常受精率(RR:0.98,95%CI:0.93-1.02)、优质胚胎率(RR:1.24,95%CI:1.0-1.53)和多精受精率(RR:0.84,95%CI:0.7-1.01)与标准授精相比,短暂共孵育配子的差异无统计学意义。
减少配子暴露时间可能与有益的结果相关。一些研究固有质量的缺点限制了现有证据的质量。需要进行充分的随机对照试验来评估短暂授精的疗效。