School of Medical and Life Sciences/Reproductive &Women-Children Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.1166 Liutai Avenue, Wenjiang District, Chengdu City, 611137, Sichuan Province, China.
The Affiliated Nanchong Central Hospital of North Sichuan Medical University, Nanchong City, Sichuan Province, China.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 23;23(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05490-z.
There is still no consensus on the optimal time of oocyte-sperm co-incubation during in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of brief (1-6 h) and long (16-24 h) gametes co-incubation time on IVF outcomes.
The study protocol was registered online through PROSPERO (CRD42022337503) and PRISMA guidelines were followed in the present study. The following databases were searched from inception to May 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs): PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, using search terms related to IVF, gametes, time of co-incubation and reproductive outcome measure. Studies comparing outcomes of brief co-incubation to that of long co-incubation during IVF, and reporting primary outcome (live birth rate), secondary outcomes (clinical pregnancy rate; ongoing pregnancy rate; miscarriage rate; normal fertilization rate; polyspermy rate; top-quality embryo rate; implantation rate) were searched. A total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Combined odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for the data. Statistical heterogeneity analysis between studies was assessed by Cochran Q and I statistic with a significant threshold of P < 0.05. Methodologic quality assessment of RCTs was made for potential risk of bias with Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Compared to long-term co-incubation, brief co-incubation had an advantage in increasing implantation rate (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.52-2.57), ongoing pregnancy rate (OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.44-3.29) and top-quality embryo rate (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02-1.35). However, brief co-incubation of gametes had no advantages in the live-birth rate (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.72-1.65), miscarriage rate (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 0.55-3.18), clinical pregnancy rate (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 0.99-1.87) and polyspermy rate (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.48-1.33) than long-term co-incubation. Additionally, the brief co-incubation was associated with lower normal fertilization rate (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.80-0.99), compared with long co-incubation.
Brief co-incubation of gametes had the advantages in increasing implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and top-quality embryo rate than long-term co-incubation. However, the live-birth rate displayed no difference between the two in vitro fertilization methods. Gametes co-incubation time should be individualized according to each patient's IVF history, infertility causes and the semen parameters.
在体外受精和胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中,卵-精子共孵育的最佳时间仍未达成共识。本荟萃分析的目的是比较短暂(1-6 小时)和较长(16-24 小时)配子共孵育时间对 IVF 结局的影响。
本研究方案已在 PROSPERO 在线注册(CRD42022337503),并遵循 PRISMA 指南。从成立到 2022 年 5 月,使用与 IVF、配子、共孵育时间和生殖结局测量相关的搜索词,在以下数据库中搜索随机对照试验(RCT):PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science。纳入比较短暂共孵育与较长共孵育在 IVF 中结局,并报告主要结局(活产率)、次要结局(临床妊娠率;持续妊娠率;流产率;正常受精率;多精率;优质胚胎率;着床率)的研究。荟萃分析共纳入 11 项研究。对于数据,计算合并优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。使用 Cochran Q 和 I 统计量评估研究之间的统计学异质性,并以 P<0.05 为显著阈值。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对 RCT 的方法学质量进行评估。
与长期共孵育相比,短暂共孵育在提高着床率(OR:1.97,95%CI:1.52-2.57)、持续妊娠率(OR:2.18,95%CI:1.44-3.29)和优质胚胎率(OR:1.17,95%CI:1.02-1.35)方面具有优势。然而,短暂共孵育的配子在活产率(OR:1.09,95%CI:0.72-1.65)、流产率(OR:1.32,95%CI:0.55-3.18)、临床妊娠率(OR:1.36,95%CI:0.99-1.87)和多精率(OR:0.80,95%CI:0.48-1.33)方面与长期共孵育相比没有优势。此外,与长期共孵育相比,短暂共孵育与较低的正常受精率(OR:0.89,95%CI:0.80-0.99)相关。
与长期共孵育相比,短暂共孵育在提高着床率、持续妊娠率和优质胚胎率方面具有优势。然而,两种体外受精方法的活产率没有差异。配子共孵育时间应根据每个患者的 IVF 史、不孕原因和精液参数进行个体化。