Institute Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, and NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, LTHT, , Leeds, UK.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):75-85. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203440. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
In disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), to compare the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (IFX) with MTX and intravenous corticosteroid for remission induction.
In a 78-week multicentre randomised controlled trial, double-blinded to week 26, 112 treatment-naive RA patients (1987 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria) with disease activity score 44 (DAS44)>2.4 were randomised to MTX + IFX or MTX + single dose intravenous methylprednisolone 250 mg. A treat-to-target approach was used with treatment escalation if DAS44>2.4. In the IFX group, IFX was discontinued for sustained remission (DAS44<1.6 for 6 months). The primary outcome was change in modified total Sharp-van der Heijde score (mTSS) at week 50.
The mean changes in mTSS score at week 50 in the IFX and intravenous steroid groups were 1.20 units and 2.81 units, respectively (adjusted difference (95% CI) -1.45 (-3.35 to 0.45); p=0.132). Radiographic non-progression (mTSS<2.0) occurred in 81% vs 71% (OR 1.77 (0.56 to 5.61); p=0.328). DAS44 remission was achieved at week 50 in 49% and 36% (OR 2.13 (0.91 to 5.00); p=0.082), and at week 78 in 48% and 50% (OR 1.12 (0.47 to 2.68); p=0.792). Exploratory analyses suggested higher DAS28 remission at week 6 and less ultrasound synovitis at week 50 in the IFX group. Of the IFX group, 25% (14/55) achieved sustained remission and stopped IFX. No substantive differences in adverse events were seen.
In DMARD-naive early RA patients, initial therapy with MTX+high-dose intravenous steroid resulted in good disease control with little structural damage. MTX+IFX was not statistically superior to MTX+intravenous steroid when combined with a treat-to-target approach.
在初治的、疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中,比较甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合英夫利昔单抗(IFX)与 MTX 联合静脉注射糖皮质激素在缓解诱导方面的疗效。
在一项 78 周的多中心、随机对照试验中,112 例初治 RA 患者(1987 年美国风湿病学会分类标准)接受了双盲治疗至第 26 周,疾病活动评分 44(DAS44)>2.4,被随机分为 MTX+IFX 或 MTX+单次静脉注射甲泼尼龙 250mg。采用达标治疗方法,如果 DAS44>2.4,则进行治疗升级。在 IFX 组中,如果持续缓解(DAS44<1.6 持续 6 个月)则停止 IFX 治疗。主要结局是第 50 周时改良总 Sharp-van der Heijde 评分(mTSS)的变化。
IFX 组和静脉注射类固醇组在第 50 周时 mTSS 评分的平均变化分别为 1.20 个单位和 2.81 个单位(调整后的差异(95%CI)-1.45(-3.35 至 0.45);p=0.132)。影像学非进展(mTSS<2.0)发生率分别为 81%和 71%(OR 1.77(0.56 至 5.61);p=0.328)。第 50 周时,49%和 36%达到 DAS44 缓解(OR 2.13(0.91 至 5.00);p=0.082),第 78 周时,48%和 50%达到 DAS44 缓解(OR 1.12(0.47 至 2.68);p=0.792)。探索性分析表明,IFX 组在第 6 周时 DAS28 缓解率更高,第 50 周时超声滑膜炎更少。在 IFX 组中,25%(14/55)达到持续缓解并停止 IFX 治疗。未观察到不良反应的实质性差异。
在初治的早期 RA 患者中,MTX+高剂量静脉注射糖皮质激素初始治疗可获得良好的疾病控制,且结构损伤较小。当与达标治疗方法联合使用时,MTX+IFX 并不优于 MTX+静脉注射糖皮质激素。