• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管年龄与经典心血管危险因素及动脉僵硬度的关系。

Relationship between vascular age and classic cardiovascular risk factors and arterial stiffness.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, T. Marciniak Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2013;20(4):394-401. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0098.

DOI:10.5603/CJ.2013.0098
PMID:23913458
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We aimed at establishing if the substitution of vascular age (VA) for chronological age (CA) causes a change in the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) categories. Sex differences in predictors of increased VA among cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and arterial stiffness (AS) parameters were identifi ed.

METHODS

In 187 asymptomatic subjects with CV risk factors, classifi ed into 3 FRS categories the VA was derived from the nomograms of the carotid intima-media thickness. Two groups: 1 - subjects whose VA has exceeded CA for at least 5 years and 2 - others were established. Carotid AS parameters were obtained from echo-tracking.

RESULTS

Substitution of VA for CA changed the FRS category into the higher one in 11.8% of subjects. Diabetes mellitus (DM) was the predictor of increased VA in both sexes, while metabolic syndrome (MS) only in women. The cut-off values of AS parameters that allow for prediction of increased VA were determined from the ROC-curve analysis - in men: b > 7.3, Ep > 103 kPa, AC < 0.61 mm2/kPa after adjustment for DM, BMI > 29.1 kg/m2, WHR > 0.85 and CA > 51 years; in women: b > 9.6, Ep > 126 kPa, AC < 0.75 mm2/kPa, PWV-b > 7.4 m/s after adjustment for DM, BMI > 25.8 kg/m2, WHR > 0.80 and CA > 60 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The substitution of VA for CA may increase the FRS category. Sex differences in predictors of increased VA were identifi ed. AS parameters proved to be predictors of increased VA besides the classic risk factors.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨血管年龄(VA)替代实际年龄(CA)是否会改变弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS)类别。本研究还鉴定了心血管(CV)危险因素和动脉僵硬度(AS)参数中导致 VA 升高的预测因素的性别差异。

方法

在 187 名有 CV 危险因素的无症状受试者中,根据颈动脉内膜中层厚度的列线图,从 VA 衍生出 VA。建立了 2 个组:1 - VA 至少超过 CA 5 年的受试者;2 - 其他受试者。从回声跟踪获得颈动脉 AS 参数。

结果

VA 替代 CA 使 FRS 类别变为更高类别的受试者占 11.8%。糖尿病(DM)是两性 VA 升高的预测因素,而代谢综合征(MS)仅在女性中如此。通过 ROC 曲线分析确定了预测 VA 升高的 AS 参数的临界值 - 男性:b>7.3、Ep>103 kPa、AC<0.61 mm2/kPa,校正 DM、BMI>29.1 kg/m2、WHR>0.85 和 CA>51 岁;女性:b>9.6、Ep>126 kPa、AC<0.75 mm2/kPa、PWV-b>7.4 m/s,校正 DM、BMI>25.8 kg/m2、WHR>0.80 和 CA>60 岁。

结论

VA 替代 CA 可能会增加 FRS 类别。鉴定了 VA 升高的预测因素的性别差异。AS 参数除了经典的危险因素外,还被证明是 VA 升高的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Relationship between vascular age and classic cardiovascular risk factors and arterial stiffness.血管年龄与经典心血管危险因素及动脉僵硬度的关系。
Cardiol J. 2013;20(4):394-401. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2013.0098.
2
Vascular or chronological age: which is the better marker to estimate the cardiovascular risk in patients with type 1 diabetes?血管年龄还是实际年龄:哪一个是评估1型糖尿病患者心血管风险的更好指标?
Acta Diabetol. 2016 Dec;53(6):925-933. doi: 10.1007/s00592-016-0891-8. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
3
Arterial stiffness is increased in asymptomatic nondiabetic postmenopausal women with a polycystic ovary syndrome phenotype.动脉僵硬度在无症状非糖尿病绝经后多囊卵巢综合征表型女性中增加。
J Hypertens. 2013 Oct;31(10):1998-2004. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283630362.
4
Decreased serum bilirubin is associated with arterial stiffness in men.血清胆红素降低与男性动脉僵硬有关。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Apr;23(4):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
5
Efficacy of a continuous metabolic syndrome score in Indian children for detecting subclinical atherosclerotic risk.一种连续代谢综合征评分在印度儿童中检测亚临床动脉粥样硬化风险的效果。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Oct;35(10):1318-24. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.138. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
6
Circulating androgen levels are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in healthy recently menopausal women.在健康的近期绝经后女性中,循环雄激素水平与亚临床动脉粥样硬化和动脉僵硬度相关。
Metabolism. 2012 Feb;61(2):193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
7
Pulse wave velocity and augmentation index, but not intima-media thickness, are early indicators of vascular damage in hypercholesterolemic children.脉搏波速度和增强指数是高脂血症儿童血管损伤的早期指标,但内膜中层厚度不是。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Mar;40(3):250-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02260.x.
8
Association of carotid intima-medial thickness and indices of arterial stiffness with cardiovascular disease outcomes in CKD.慢性肾脏病患者颈动脉内膜中层厚度及动脉僵硬度指标与心血管疾病预后的关联
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Oct;50(4):622-30. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.012.
9
Metabolic syndrome and age-related progression of aortic stiffness.代谢综合征与主动脉僵硬度的年龄相关性进展
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Jan 3;47(1):72-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.052. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
10
Associations of non-invasive measures of arterial structure and function, and traditional indicators of cardiovascular risk in adults with cerebral palsy.成人脑瘫患者动脉结构和功能的非侵入性测量指标与心血管疾病传统风险指标之间的关联。
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Dec;243(2):462-5. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.09.035. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
A short recorded pulse dataset for vascular age prediction in China.一个用于中国血管年龄预测的简短记录脉搏数据集。
Sci Data. 2025 Jul 22;12(1):1274. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-05598-1.
2
Comparison between vascular age based on brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity or carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity.基于肱踝脉搏波速度或颈股脉搏波速度的血管年龄之间的比较。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02281-1.
3
Arterial Stiffness May Predict Subsequent Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Patients.动脉僵硬度可能预测乳腺癌患者后续癌症治疗相关的心脏功能障碍。
Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2024 Apr;24(4):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s12012-024-09841-w. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
Comparison between Carotid Distensibility-Based Vascular Age and Risk-Based Vascular Age in Middle-Aged Population Free of Cardiovascular Disease.无心血管疾病中年人群中基于颈动脉扩张性的血管年龄与基于风险的血管年龄的比较。
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 22;11(16):4931. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164931.
5
Aortic Stiffness: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Relevant Biomarkers.主动脉僵硬度:流行病学、风险因素及相关生物标志物
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 8;8:709396. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.709396. eCollection 2021.
6
Local elasticity of the aorta in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.2型糖尿病患者主动脉的局部弹性
J Int Med Res. 2020 Sep;48(9):300060520952643. doi: 10.1177/0300060520952643.
7
Circulating Endothelial Microparticles and Aortic Stiffness in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.2 型糖尿病患者循环内皮微颗粒与主动脉僵硬度。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 16;55(9):596. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090596.
8
A Study of Correlation of Neck Circumference with Framingham Risk Score as a Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease.一项关于颈围与弗雷明汉风险评分作为冠状动脉疾病预测指标相关性的研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Sep;11(9):OC17-OC20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25710.10609. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
9
Predictive value of the augmentation index derived vascular age in patients with newly diagnosed atherosclerosis.新诊断动脉粥样硬化患者中增强指数衍生血管年龄的预测价值
Heart Vessels. 2017 Mar;32(3):252-259. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0868-0. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
10
Outpatient diabetes clinical decision support: current status and future directions.门诊糖尿病临床决策支持:现状与未来方向。
Diabet Med. 2016 Jun;33(6):734-41. doi: 10.1111/dme.13090.