• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国诺森伯兰郡转诊方案中运动干预效果评估:与身体活动的关联及参与预测因素。一项自然观察研究。

An evaluation of the efficacy of the exercise on referral scheme in Northumberland, UK: association with physical activity and predictors of engagement. A naturalistic observation study.

机构信息

Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Northumbria, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 2;3(8):e002849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002849.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002849
PMID:23913772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733299/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Exercise on referral schemes (ERS) are widely commissioned in the UK but there is little evidence of their association with physical activity levels. We sought to assess the Northumberland exercise on referral scheme in terms of increased levels of physical activity and identify predictors of engagement.

DESIGN

A naturalistic observational study.

SETTING

9 local authority leisure sites in Northumberland.

PARTICIPANTS

2233 patients referred from primary and secondary care between July 2009 and September 2010.

INTERVENTION

A 24-week programme including motivational consultations and supervised exercise sessions for participants.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Uptake, 12-week adherence, 24-week completion, changes in Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire scores after 24-weeks and attendance levels at supervised exercise sessions during the scheme. Three binary logistic regressions were used to examine demographic and referral factors associated with initial uptake, 12-week adherence and 24-week completion.

RESULTS

Uptake was 81% (n=1811), 12-week adherence was 53.5% (n=968) and 24-week completion was 42.9% (n=777). Participants who completed significantly increased their self-reported physical activity levels at 24-weeks t (638)=-11.55, p<0.001. Completers attended a mean of 22.87 (12.47 SD) of a target 48 supervised sessions. Increasing age, being female and leisure site were associated with uptake, increasing age, Index of Multiple Deprivation and leisure site were associated with 12-week adherence and Body Mass Index and leisure site were associated with 24-week completion. Each regression significantly increased the prediction accuracy of stage of exit (non-starters vs starters 81.5%, dropouts before 12 weeks vs 12-week adherers 66.9%, and dropouts between 13 and 24 weeks 82.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Completers of the Northumberland ERS increased physical activity at 24 weeks, although the levels achieved were below the current UK guidelines of 150 min of moderate exercise per week. Leisure site was associated with uptake, adherence and completion.

摘要

目的

在英国,广泛委托进行运动转介计划(ERS),但几乎没有证据表明它们与身体活动水平有关。我们旨在评估诺森伯兰运动转介计划在提高身体活动水平方面的效果,并确定参与的预测因素。

设计

自然观察研究。

地点

诺森伯兰的 9 个地方当局休闲场所。

参与者

2009 年 7 月至 2010 年 9 月期间从初级和二级保健机构转介的 2233 名患者。

干预措施

一项为期 24 周的计划,包括参与者的动机咨询和监督运动课程。

结果测量

接受率、12 周坚持率、24 周完成率、24 周后 Godin 休闲时间运动问卷评分的变化以及计划期间监督运动课程的出勤率。使用三个二元逻辑回归来检查与初始接受率、12 周坚持率和 24 周完成率相关的人口统计学和转介因素。

结果

接受率为 81%(n=1811),12 周坚持率为 53.5%(n=968),24 周完成率为 42.9%(n=777)。完成者在 24 周时自我报告的身体活动水平显著增加 t(638)=-11.55,p<0.001。完成者平均参加了目标 48 次监督课程中的 22.87(12.47 SD)次。年龄增长、女性和休闲场所与接受率相关,年龄增长、多重贫困指数和休闲场所与 12 周坚持率相关,身体质量指数和休闲场所与 24 周完成率相关。每次回归都显著提高了退出阶段的预测准确性(非启动者与启动者 81.5%,12 周前辍学者与 12 周坚持者 66.9%,13 至 24 周辍学者 82.2%)。

结论

诺森伯兰 ERS 的完成者在 24 周时增加了身体活动量,但达到的水平低于英国目前每周 150 分钟中等强度运动的指南。休闲场所与接受率、坚持率和完成率有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/3733299/7e4f18371f0f/bmjopen2013002849f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/3733299/11f9dcd3173a/bmjopen2013002849f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/3733299/7e4f18371f0f/bmjopen2013002849f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/3733299/11f9dcd3173a/bmjopen2013002849f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6931/3733299/7e4f18371f0f/bmjopen2013002849f02.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the efficacy of the exercise on referral scheme in Northumberland, UK: association with physical activity and predictors of engagement. A naturalistic observation study.英国诺森伯兰郡转诊方案中运动干预效果评估:与身体活动的关联及参与预测因素。一项自然观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Aug 2;3(8):e002849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002849.
2
Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK.理解运动活动转介后在休闲中心进行的身体活动:来自英国诺森伯兰郡计划参与者和完成者的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 13;18(6):2957. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062957.
3
Moving an exercise referral scheme to remote delivery during the Covid-19 pandemic: an observational study examining the impact on uptake, adherence, and costs.在新冠疫情期间将运动推荐计划转移到远程提供:一项观察性研究,考察其对参与度、坚持度和成本的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):2324. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19392-y.
4
How do participant experiences and characteristics influence engagement in exercise referral? A qualitative longitudinal study of a scheme in Northumberland, UK.参与者的体验和特征如何影响锻炼推荐的参与度?英国诺森伯兰郡一项方案的定性纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e024370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024370.
5
Erratum.勘误
Mult Scler. 2016 Oct;22(12):NP9-NP11. doi: 10.1177/1352458515585718. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Exercise referral: the public health panacea for physical activity promotion? A critical perspective of exercise referral schemes; their development and evaluation.运动转诊:促进身体活动的公共卫生万灵药?对运动转诊计划的批判性审视;其发展与评估。
Ergonomics. 2005;48(11-14):1390-410. doi: 10.1080/00140130500101544.
7
Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): a randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community-based walking and advice only.运动评估随机试验(EXERT):一项随机试验,比较全科医生转诊至休闲中心运动、社区步行和仅提供建议的情况。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(10):1-165, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11100.
8
Prototyping for public health in a local context: a streamlined evaluation of a community-based weight management programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK.本地背景下公共卫生的原型设计:对英国诺森伯兰郡一项基于社区的体重管理计划(Momenta)的简化评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 31;9(10):e029718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029718.
9
Gender Differences in Uptake, Adherence and Experiences: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Study of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme in Scotland, UK.性别差异在参与、坚持和体验方面的表现:英国苏格兰一项身体活动推荐计划的纵向混合方法研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 10;18(4):1700. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041700.
10
Pragmatic evaluation of a coproduced physical activity referral scheme: a UK quasi-experimental study.一项联合制定的体育活动转诊计划的务实评估:一项英国准实验研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 1;10(10):e034580. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034580.

引用本文的文献

1
An evaluation of a community-based intervention in England aiming to reduce inequalities in exercise participation.对英国一项旨在减少运动参与方面不平等现象的社区干预措施的评估。
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Jun 20;7:1505249. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1505249. eCollection 2025.
2
Moving an exercise referral scheme to remote delivery during the Covid-19 pandemic: an observational study examining the impact on uptake, adherence, and costs.在新冠疫情期间将运动推荐计划转移到远程提供:一项观察性研究,考察其对参与度、坚持度和成本的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;24(1):2324. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19392-y.
3
Are physical activity referral scheme components associated with increased physical activity, scheme uptake, and adherence rate? A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

本文引用的文献

1
An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative.英国威尔士国家运动推荐计划的有效性和成本效益评估:一项公共卫生政策倡议的随机对照试验。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):745-53. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200689. Epub 2012 May 10.
2
Levels and predictors of exercise referral scheme uptake and adherence: a systematic review.运动推荐计划的参与度和坚持度的水平和预测因素:系统综述。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Aug;66(8):737-44. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200354. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
3
体育活动转介计划各组成部分与增加身体活动量、计划参与率和遵嘱率有关吗?一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Aug 2;21(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01623-5.
4
A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes' components.系统评价和体力活动转介计划组成部分的叙述性综合。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Nov 27;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01518-x.
5
The role of self-regulation strategies in physical activity behavior change: results from an exercise prescription program at a Federally Qualified Health Center.自我调节策略在身体活动行为改变中的作用:一项在联邦合格健康中心进行的运动处方计划的结果。
Psychol Health Med. 2023 Dec;28(10):2798-2812. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2143540. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
6
The effectiveness of the Healthworks Staying Steady community-based falls prevention exercise programme to improve physical function in older adults: a 6-year service evaluation.健康工程(Healthworks)社区基础防跌锻炼计划对改善老年人身体功能的有效性:6 年服务评估。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):1457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13832-3.
7
Factors associated with increased physical activity among patients prescribed physical activity in Swedish routine health care including an offer of counselor support: a 1-year follow-up.与在瑞典常规医疗保健中开具运动处方的患者中增加身体活动相关的因素,包括提供咨询支持:为期 1 年的随访。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12940-4.
8
The match between what is prescribed and reasons for prescribing in exercise referral schemes: a mixed method study.运动推荐计划中的规定内容与推荐理由的匹配情况:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 28;21(1):1003. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11094-z.
9
Inequalities and Inclusion in Exercise Referral Schemes: A Mixed-Method Multi-Scheme Analysis.运动转诊计划中的不平等与包容性:一项混合方法多计划分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;18(6):3033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063033.
10
Understanding Leisure Centre-Based Physical Activity after Physical Activity Referral: Evidence from Scheme Participants and Completers in Northumberland UK.理解运动活动转介后在休闲中心进行的身体活动:来自英国诺森伯兰郡计划参与者和完成者的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 13;18(6):2957. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062957.
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
运动推荐计划的临床效果和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Dec;15(44):i-xii, 1-254. doi: 10.3310/hta15440.
4
Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.运动推荐计划在初级保健中对身体活动和改善健康结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2011 Nov 4;343:d6462. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6462.
5
An evaluation of the effectiveness of 'Active for Life': an exercise referral scheme in West Suffolk.“积极生活”项目效果评估:西萨福克郡的一项运动转诊计划
Public Health. 2009 Oct;123(10):670-2. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.09.005. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
6
Factors associated with physical activity referral completion and health outcomes.与身体活动转诊完成情况及健康结果相关的因素。
J Sports Sci. 2009 Aug;27(10):1007-17. doi: 10.1080/02640410903214248.
7
Does physical activity ameliorate the health hazards of obesity?体育活动能改善肥胖对健康的危害吗?
Br J Sports Med. 2009 Jan;43(1):49-51. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.054536. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
8
Do general practices provide equitable access to physical activity interventions?普通医疗服务机构能否提供公平的体育活动干预措施?
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Oct;58(555):e1-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X342237.
9
Running along parallel lines: how political reality impedes the evaluation of public health interventions. A case study of exercise referral schemes in England.并行发展:政治现实如何阻碍公共卫生干预措施的评估。以英国的运动转诊计划为例
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Sep;62(9):835-41. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.069781.
10
Effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults: systematic review.运动转诊计划促进成年人身体活动的有效性:系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Dec;57(545):979-86. doi: 10.3399/096016407782604866.