• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本地背景下公共卫生的原型设计:对英国诺森伯兰郡一项基于社区的体重管理计划(Momenta)的简化评估

Prototyping for public health in a local context: a streamlined evaluation of a community-based weight management programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK.

作者信息

Dodd-Reynolds Caroline J, Nevens Lisa, Oliver Emily J, Finch Tracy, Lake Amelia A, Hanson Coral L

机构信息

Department of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK

Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing Physical Activity Special Interest Group, Durham University, Durham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 31;9(10):e029718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029718.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029718
PMID:31676645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6830698/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Stakeholder co-production in design of public health programmes may reduce the 'implementation gap' but can be time-consuming and costly. Prototyping, iterative refining relevant to delivery context, offers a potential solution. This evaluation explored implementation and lessons learnt for a 12-week referral-based weight-management programme, 'Momenta', along with feasibility of an iterative prototyping evaluation framework.

DESIGN

Mixed methods evaluation: Qualitative implementation exploration with referrers and service users; preliminary analysis of anonymised quantitative service data (12 and 52 weeks).

SETTING

Two leisure centres in Northumberland, North East England.

PARTICIPANTS

Individual interviews with referring professionals (n=5) and focus groups with service users (n=13). Individuals (n=182) referred by healthcare professionals (quantitative data).

INTERVENTIONS

Three 12-week programme iterations: Momenta (n=59), Momenta-Fitness membership (n=58) and Fitness membership only (n=65).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome: Qualitative themes developed through stakeholder-engagement. Secondary outcomes included preliminary exploration of recruitment, uptake, retention, and changes in weight, body mass index, waist circumference and psychological well-being.

RESULTS

Service users reported positive experiences of Momenta. Implementation gaps were revealed around the referral process and practitioner knowledge. Prototyping enabled iterative refinements such as broadening inclusion criteria. Uptake and 12-week retention were higher for Momenta (84.7%, 45.8%) and Momenta-Fitness (93.1%, 60.3%) versus Fitness only (75.4%, 24.6%). Exploration of other preliminary outcomes (completers only) suggested potential for within-group weight loss and increased psychological well-being for Momenta and Momenta-Fitness at 12 weeks. 52 week follow-up data were limited (32%, 33% and 6% retention for those who started Momenta, Momenta-Fitness and Fitness, respectively) but suggested potential weight loss maintenance for Momenta-Fitness.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of issues within the referral process enabled real-time iterative refinement, while lessons learnt may be of value for local implementation of 'off-the-shelf' weight management packages more generally. Our preliminary data for completers suggest Momenta may have potential for weight loss, particularly when offered with a fitness membership.

摘要

目标

在公共卫生项目设计中进行利益相关者共同生产可能会减少“实施差距”,但可能耗时且成本高昂。与交付背景相关的迭代式原型设计提供了一种潜在的解决方案。本评估探讨了一项为期12周的基于转诊的体重管理项目“Momenta”的实施情况和经验教训,以及迭代式原型评估框架的可行性。

设计

混合方法评估:对转诊者和服务使用者进行定性实施探索;对匿名定量服务数据(12周和52周)进行初步分析。

背景

英格兰东北部诺森伯兰郡的两个休闲中心。

参与者

对转诊专业人员进行个人访谈(n = 5),对服务使用者进行焦点小组访谈(n = 13)。由医疗保健专业人员转诊的个体(n = 182)(定量数据)。

干预措施

三个为期12周的项目迭代:Momenta(n = 59)、Momenta - 健身会员(n = 58)和仅健身会员(n = 65)。

主要和次要结局指标

主要结局:通过利益相关者参与形成的定性主题。次要结局包括对招募、参与、留存以及体重、体重指数、腰围和心理健康变化的初步探索。

结果

服务使用者报告了对Momenta的积极体验。在转诊过程和从业者知识方面发现了实施差距。原型设计实现了诸如拓宽纳入标准等迭代式改进。Momenta(84.7%,45.8%)和Momenta - 健身会员(93.1%,60.3%)的参与率和12周留存率高于仅健身会员(75.4%,24.6%)。对其他初步结局(仅针对完成者)的探索表明,Momenta和Momenta - 健身会员在12周时有组内体重减轻和心理健康改善的潜力。52周的随访数据有限(开始Momenta、Momenta - 健身会员和仅健身会员项目的参与者留存率分别为32%、33%和6%),但表明Momenta - 健身会员有维持体重减轻效果的潜力。

结论

识别转诊过程中的问题实现了实时迭代改进,而吸取的经验教训可能对更广泛地在当地实施“现成的”体重管理方案具有价值。我们针对完成者的初步数据表明,Momenta可能有减肥潜力,特别是在提供健身会员资格时。

相似文献

1
Prototyping for public health in a local context: a streamlined evaluation of a community-based weight management programme (Momenta), Northumberland, UK.本地背景下公共卫生的原型设计:对英国诺森伯兰郡一项基于社区的体重管理计划(Momenta)的简化评估
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 31;9(10):e029718. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029718.
2
Adding web-based behavioural support to exercise referral schemes for inactive adults with chronic health conditions: the e-coachER RCT.为患有慢性疾病的不活跃成年人的运动推荐计划添加基于网络的行为支持:e-coachER RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(63):1-106. doi: 10.3310/hta24630.
3
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
4
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a motivational interviewing-based intervention for weight loss maintenance in adults.一项针对成年人减肥维持的基于动机性访谈干预的可行性随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Jul;19(50):v-vi, xix-xxv, 1-378. doi: 10.3310/hta19500.
5
How do participant experiences and characteristics influence engagement in exercise referral? A qualitative longitudinal study of a scheme in Northumberland, UK.参与者的体验和特征如何影响锻炼推荐的参与度?英国诺森伯兰郡一项方案的定性纵向研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 20;9(2):e024370. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024370.
6
7
Exercise Evaluation Randomised Trial (EXERT): a randomised trial comparing GP referral for leisure centre-based exercise, community-based walking and advice only.运动评估随机试验(EXERT):一项随机试验,比较全科医生转诊至休闲中心运动、社区步行和仅提供建议的情况。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(10):1-165, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11100.
8
Randomised controlled trial and economic analysis of an internet-based weight management programme: POWeR+ (Positive Online Weight Reduction).一项基于互联网的体重管理计划:POWeR+(积极在线减重)的随机对照试验及经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(4):1-62. doi: 10.3310/hta21040.
9
An evaluation of a multi-component adult weight management on referral intervention in a community setting.一项关于社区环境中多成分成人体重管理转诊干预的评估。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 17;9:104. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1901-1.
10
A mixed method evaluation of adult tier 2 lifestyle weight management service provision across a county in Northern England.对英格兰北部一个郡的成人二级生活方式体重管理服务提供情况的混合方法评估。
Clin Obes. 2018 Jun;8(3):191-202. doi: 10.1111/cob.12250. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics.医疗保健中的共同生产绩效评估。方法、工具和指标的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 24;18(7):3336. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073336.
2
Addressing Obesity to Promote Healthy Aging.解决肥胖问题以促进健康老龄化。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 Nov;36(4):631-643. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2020.06.006. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
3
The Northumberland Exercise Referral Scheme as a Universal Community Weight Management Programme: A Mixed Methods Exploration of Outcomes, Expectations and Experiences across a Social Gradient.诺森伯兰运动推荐计划作为一种通用的社区体重管理方案:对社会梯度中结果、期望和经验的混合方法探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 23;17(15):5297. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155297.

本文引用的文献

1
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?共同生产的阴暗面:对于健康研究来说,其成本是否超过了收益?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
2
Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.改善针对烟草、酒精、饮食、身体活动和肥胖的工作场所政策或措施实施情况的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11(11):CD012439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012439.pub2.
3
Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in children and adults with overweight or obesity.改变卫生专业人员行为及护理组织方式的干预措施,以促进超重或肥胖儿童及成人减轻体重。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 30;11(11):CD000984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000984.pub3.
4
Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions.公共卫生干预措施共同生产与原型制作框架的开发。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4695-8.
5
The Public Health Innovation Model: Merging Private Sector Processes with Public Health Strengths.公共卫生创新模式:将私营部门流程与公共卫生优势相结合。
Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 7;5:192. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00192. eCollection 2017.
6
A systematic review of reviews: exploring the relationship between obesity, weight loss and health-related quality of life.综述的系统评价:探讨肥胖、体重减轻与健康相关生活质量之间的关系。
Clin Obes. 2017 Oct;7(5):273-289. doi: 10.1111/cob.12203. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
7
Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency.为什么有些针对饮食和肥胖问题的人群干预措施比其他措施更公平、更有效?个体能动性的作用。
PLoS Med. 2016 Apr 5;13(4):e1001990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990. eCollection 2016 Apr.
8
Inequalities in the uptake of weight management interventions in a pragmatic trial: an observational study in primary care.一项实用试验中体重管理干预措施采用情况的不平等性:一项初级保健中的观察性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):e258-63. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684337. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
9
Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity.体重偏见和污名对肥胖患者医疗质量及治疗结果的影响。
Obes Rev. 2015 Apr;16(4):319-26. doi: 10.1111/obr.12266. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
10
Poor mental health in severely obese patients is not explained by the presence of comorbidities.严重肥胖患者的心理健康不佳并非由合并症的存在所解释。
Clin Obes. 2015 Feb;5(1):12-21. doi: 10.1111/cob.12081. Epub 2014 Dec 22.