Milton S G, Knutson V P
Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77225.
J Cell Physiol. 1990 Sep;144(3):498-504. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041440318.
In cell culture, both endothelial and epithelial cell monolayers have been found to generate structurally similar tight junctional complexes, as assessed by thin complexes of the two cell types are, at least in part, responsible for the very different permeability characteristics of native endothelial and epithelial cell monolayers. The purpose of this work was to compare cultured endothelial and epithelial cells with respect to the function of their tight junctional complexes in regulating the movement of macromolecules and ions across the cell monolayers, and define functional parameters to characterize the tight junctional complexes. Bovine aorta endothelial cells and T84 colonic carcinoma epithelial cells were cultured on a microporous membrane support. The permeability coefficients of inulin, albumin, and insulin were determined with the cell monolayers and compared with the permeability coefficients obtained with 3T3-C2 fibroblasts, a cell line that does not generate tight junctions. Electrical resistance measurements across the monolayer-filter systems were also compared. The permeability coefficient of albumin across the endothelial cell monolayer compared favorably with other reported values. Likewise, the electrical resistance across the T84 cell monolayer was in good agreement with published values. Utilizing permeability coefficients for macromolecules as an index of tight junction function, we found that a distinction between a lack of tight junctions (fibroblasts), the presence of endothelial tight junctions, and the presence of epithelial tight junctions was readily made. However, when utilizing electrical resistance as an index of tight junction function, identical measurements were obtained with fibroblasts and endothelial cells. This indicates that more than one index of tight junction function is necessary to characterize the junctional complexes. Although structurally similar, epithelial cell and endothelial cell tight junctions perform very different functions, and, from our data, we conclude that the demonstration of tight junctional structures by electron microscopy is not relevant to the functional nature of the junction: structure does not imply function. A minimal assessment of tight junction function should rely on both the determination of the electrical resistance across the cell monolayer, and the determination of the permeability coefficients of selected macromolecules.
在细胞培养中,内皮细胞和上皮细胞单层均已被发现可形成结构相似的紧密连接复合体,通过超薄切片评估发现,这两种细胞类型的紧密连接复合体至少在一定程度上导致了天然内皮细胞和上皮细胞单层截然不同的通透性特征。本研究的目的是比较培养的内皮细胞和上皮细胞紧密连接复合体在调节大分子和离子跨细胞单层转运方面的功能,并确定表征紧密连接复合体的功能参数。将牛主动脉内皮细胞和T84结肠癌细胞上皮细胞培养在微孔膜支架上。测定了菊粉、白蛋白和胰岛素通过细胞单层的通透系数,并与未形成紧密连接的3T3 - C2成纤维细胞系所获得的通透系数进行比较。还比较了跨单层 - 滤器系统的电阻测量值。白蛋白通过内皮细胞单层的通透系数与其他报道值相当。同样,T84细胞单层的电阻与已发表的值相符。利用大分子的通透系数作为紧密连接功能的指标,我们发现很容易区分缺乏紧密连接(成纤维细胞)、存在内皮紧密连接和存在上皮紧密连接的情况。然而,当利用电阻作为紧密连接功能的指标时,成纤维细胞和内皮细胞获得了相同的测量值。这表明需要不止一个紧密连接功能指标来表征连接复合体。尽管上皮细胞和内皮细胞的紧密连接在结构上相似,但它们执行非常不同的功能,并且根据我们的数据,我们得出结论,通过电子显微镜证明紧密连接结构与连接的功能性质无关:结构并不意味着功能。对紧密连接功能的最小评估应依赖于测定跨细胞单层的电阻以及选定大分子的通透系数。