Kang Dianmin, Tao Xiaorun, Liao Meizhen, Li Jianzhuo, Zhang Na, Zhu Xiaoyan, Sun Xiaoguang, Lin Bin, Su Shengli, Hao Lianzheng, Jia Yujiang
Institution for AIDS/STD Control and Prevention & Shandong Key Laboratory for Epidemic Disease Control and Prevention, Shandong CDC, Jinan, Shandong Province 250014, PR China.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 4;13:717. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-717.
We assessed the effectiveness of an integrated individual, community, and structural intervention to reduce risks of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among female sex workers (FSWs).
The integration individual, community, and structural intervention was implemented from 2004 to 2009 in six counties of Shandong Province. Post-intervention cross-sectional surveys were conducted in six intervention counties and 10 control counties.
Of 3326 female sex workers were recruited and analyzed in the post-intervention survey with 1157 from intervention sites and 2169 from control sites. No HIV positive was found in both intervention and control counties. The rate of syphilis was 0.17% for intervention sites and 1.89% for control sites (OR=11.1, 95% CI: 2.7, 46.1). After adjusted for age, marital status, education, economic condition, recruitment venues, the rates of condom use in the last sex with clients(AOR=2.7; 95% CI: 1.9, 3.8), with regular sex partners(AOR=1.5; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.9) and consistent condom use in the last month with clients (AOR=3.3; 95% CI: 2.6, 4.1) and regular sex partners (AOR=1.7; 95% CI: 1.3, 2.3) were significantly higher in intervention sites than that in control sites. The proportion of participants correctly answered at least six out of eight HIV-related questions (83.3%) in intervention sites is significant higher than that (21.9%) in control sites (AOR=24.7; 95% CI: 2.5, 42.7), the five indicators related to HIV-related intervention services ever received in the last year including HIV testing(AOR=4.9; 95% CI: 2.8, 6.7), STD examination and/or treatment(AOR=5.1; 95% CI: 4.2, 6.4), free condom(AOR=20.3; 95% CI: 14.3, 28.9), peer education(AOR=4.3; 95% CI: 3.5, 5.4), education materials(AOR=19.8; 95%CI: 13.1, 29.8) were significantly higher in intervention sites than that in control sites, the participants in the intervention sites are more likely to seek medical treatment when they had any disorders (AOR=3.2; 95% CI: 2.5, 4.2).
This study found that the integrated individual, community, and structural intervention showed positive impact in reducing HIV and STI risks among FSWs.
我们评估了一项综合个体、社区和结构层面的干预措施在降低女性性工作者(FSW)感染艾滋病毒和性传播感染(STI)风险方面的有效性。
2004年至2009年在山东省六个县实施了综合个体、社区和结构层面的干预措施。在六个干预县和十个对照县进行了干预后横断面调查。
在干预后调查中招募并分析了3326名女性性工作者,其中1157名来自干预地点,2169名来自对照地点。干预县和对照县均未发现艾滋病毒阳性病例。干预地点梅毒感染率为0.17%,对照地点为1.89%(OR = 11.1,95%CI:2.7,46.1)。在对年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、经济状况、招募场所进行调整后,与客户最近一次性行为时的避孕套使用率(调整后比值比[AOR]=2.7;95%CI:1.9,3.8)、与固定性伴侣性行为时的避孕套使用率(AOR = 1.5;95%CI:1.1,1.9)以及过去一个月与客户和固定性伴侣性行为时始终使用避孕套的比例(与客户性行为时:AOR = 3.3;95%CI:2.6,4.1;与固定性伴侣性行为时:AOR = 1.7;95%CI:1.3,2.3)在干预地点均显著高于对照地点。干预地点至少正确回答八个与艾滋病毒相关问题中的六个的参与者比例(83.3%)显著高于对照地点(21.9%)(AOR = 24.7;95%CI:2.5,42.7),过去一年中接受的五项与艾滋病毒相关干预服务指标,包括艾滋病毒检测(AOR = 4.9;95%CI:2.8,6.7)、性传播感染检查和/或治疗(AOR = 5.1;95%CI:4.2,6.4)、免费避孕套(AOR = 20.3;95%CI:14.3,28.9)、同伴教育(AOR = 4.3;95%CI:3.5,5.4)、教育材料(AOR = 19.8;95%CI:13.1,29.8)在干预地点均显著高于对照地点,干预地点的参与者在出现任何疾病时更有可能寻求医疗治疗(AOR = 3.2;95%CI:2.5,4.2)。
本研究发现,综合个体、社区和结构层面的干预措施在降低女性性工作者感染艾滋病毒和性传播感染风险方面显示出积极影响。