Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Bldg, 1, Room 1107, Boston, MA, USA.
Arch Public Health. 2013 Aug 2;71(1):20. doi: 10.1186/0778-7367-71-20.
Mass media campaigns are frequently used to influence the health behaviors of various populations. There are currently no quantitative meta-analyses of the effect of mass media campaigns on physical activity in adults.
We searched six electronic databases from their inception to August 2012 and selected prospective studies that evaluated the effect of mass media campaigns on physical activity in adults. We excluded studies that did not have a proper control group or did not report the uncertainties of the effect estimates. Two reviewers independently screened the title/abstracts and full articles. We used random-effects models to pool effect estimates across studies for 3 selected outcomes.
Nine prospective cohorts and before-after studies that followed-up 27,601 people over 8 weeks to 3 years met the inclusion criteria. Based on the pooled results from these studies, mass media campaigns had a significant effect on promoting moderate intensity walking (pooled relative risk (RR) from 3 studies=1.53, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.25 to 1.87), but did not help participants achieve sufficient levels of physical activity [4 studies pooled RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.14)]. The apparent effect of media campaigns on reducing sedentary behavior (pooled RR=1.15, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.30) was lost when a relatively low-quality study with large effects was excluded in a sensitivity analysis. In subgroup analyses, campaigns that promoted physical activity as a 'social norm' seemed to be more effective in reducing sedentary behavior.
Mass media campaigns may promote walking but may not reduce sedentary behavior or lead to achieving recommended levels of overall physical activity. Further research is warranted on different campaign types and in low- and middle- income countries.
大众媒体宣传活动常用于影响各类人群的健康行为。目前尚无针对大众媒体宣传活动对成年人身体活动影响的定量荟萃分析。
我们从创建伊始至 2012 年 8 月检索了 6 个电子数据库,并选择了评估大众媒体宣传活动对成年人身体活动影响的前瞻性研究。我们排除了没有适当对照组或未报告效果估计不确定性的研究。两名评审员独立筛选标题/摘要和全文。我们使用随机效应模型汇总了 3 项选定结果的研究间效果估计值。
有 9 项前瞻性队列研究和前后对照研究符合纳入标准,共随访了 27601 人 8 周至 3 年。基于这些研究的汇总结果,大众媒体宣传活动对促进中等强度步行有显著效果(3 项研究的汇总相对风险(RR)=1.53,95%置信区间:1.25 至 1.87),但无助于参与者达到足够的身体活动水平[4 项研究的 RR=1.02,95%置信区间:0.91 至 1.14]。当一项具有较大影响的低质量研究被排除在敏感性分析之外时,大众媒体宣传活动对减少久坐行为的明显效果(RR=1.15,95%置信区间:1.03 至 1.30)消失了。在亚组分析中,宣传活动将身体活动宣传为“社会规范”似乎更有助于减少久坐行为。
大众媒体宣传活动可能会促进步行,但可能不会减少久坐行为或导致达到建议的总体身体活动水平。需要对不同类型的宣传活动和中低收入国家进行进一步研究。