Frissen Ilja, Mars Franck
a IRCCyN (Institut de Recherche en Communications et Cybernétique de Nantes), CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Nantes, LUNAM Université , Nantes , France.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(3):499-507. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.819518. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
It has long been held that steering a vehicle is subserved by two distinct visual processes, a compensatory one for maintaining lane position and an anticipatory one for previewing the curvature of the upcoming road. In this study, we investigated the robustness of these two steering control processes by systematically degrading their visual inputs. Performance was measured at the level of vehicle position and at the level of the actions on the steering wheel. The results show that the compensatory process is more robust to visual degradation than the anticipatory process. The results are also consistent with the idea that steering is under the supervision of a combination of compensatory and anticipatory mechanisms, although they suggest that the quality of the sensory information will determine how information is combined.
长期以来,人们一直认为驾驶车辆由两种不同的视觉过程来实现,一种是用于保持车道位置的补偿性过程,另一种是用于预览前方道路曲率的预期性过程。在本研究中,我们通过系统地降低这两种转向控制过程的视觉输入来研究它们的稳健性。在车辆位置层面和方向盘操作层面测量了性能。结果表明,补偿性过程比预期性过程对视觉退化更具稳健性。这些结果也与转向受补偿性和预期性机制组合监督的观点一致,尽管它们表明感觉信息的质量将决定信息如何组合。