• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于适当控制食物份量的心理、社会和行为障碍的定性研究。

A qualitative study of psychological, social and behavioral barriers to appropriate food portion size control.

机构信息

Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 1;10:92. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-92.

DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-10-92
PMID:23915381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3734152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the worldwide prevalence of overweight and obesity, there is a clear need for meaningful practical healthy eating advice - not only in relation to food choice, but also on appropriate food portion sizes. As the majority of portion size research to date has been overwhelmingly quantitative in design, there is a clear need to qualitatively explore consumers' views in order to fully understand how food portion size decisions are made. Using qualitative methodology this present study aimed to explore consumers' views about factors influencing their portion size selection and consumption and to identify barriers to appropriate portion size control.

METHODS

Ten focus groups with four to nine participants in each were formed with a total of 66 persons (aged 19-64 years) living on the island of Ireland. The semi-structured discussions elicited participants' perceptions of suggested serving size guidance and explored the influence of personal, social and environmental factors on their food portion size consumption. Audiotapes of the discussions were professionally transcribed verbatim, loaded into NVivo 9, and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis procedure.

RESULTS

The rich descriptive data derived from participants highlight that unhealthy portion size behaviors emanate from various psychological, social and behavioral factors. These bypass reflective and deliberative control, and converge to constitute significant barriers to healthy portion size control. Seven significant barriers to healthy portion size control were apparent: (1) lack of clarity and irrelevance of suggested serving size guidance; (2) guiltless eating; (3) lack of self-control over food cues; (4) distracted eating; (5) social pressures; (6) emotional eating rewards; and (7) quantification habits ingrained from childhood.

CONCLUSIONS

Portion size control strategies should empower consumers to overcome these effects so that the consumption of appropriate food portion sizes becomes automatic and habitual.

摘要

背景

鉴于超重和肥胖在全球的流行,显然需要有意义的实用健康饮食建议——不仅与食物选择有关,还与适当的食物份量有关。由于迄今为止大多数关于份量的研究在设计上都过于注重定量,因此,显然需要从质的方面探讨消费者的观点,以便充分了解食物份量决策是如何做出的。本研究采用定性方法,旨在探讨消费者对影响其份量选择和消费的因素的看法,并确定适当份量控制的障碍。

方法

在爱尔兰岛生活的 66 人(年龄 19-64 岁)中,组成了 10 个每组 4-9 人的焦点小组。半结构式讨论引出了参与者对建议份量指导的看法,并探讨了个人、社会和环境因素对其食物份量消费的影响。讨论的录音带由专业人员逐字逐句转录,加载到 NVivo 9 中,并使用归纳主题分析程序进行分析。

结果

参与者提供的丰富描述性数据表明,不健康的份量行为源于各种心理、社会和行为因素。这些因素绕过了反思性和深思熟虑的控制,并汇聚在一起,构成了健康份量控制的重大障碍。有七个明显的健康份量控制障碍:(1)建议份量指导缺乏清晰度和相关性;(2)无罪感的饮食;(3)缺乏对食物线索的自我控制;(4)分心的饮食;(5)社会压力;(6)情绪化饮食的奖励;(7)从童年时期就根深蒂固的量化习惯。

结论

份量控制策略应该使消费者有能力克服这些影响,从而使适当的食物份量消费变得自动和习惯化。

相似文献

1
A qualitative study of psychological, social and behavioral barriers to appropriate food portion size control.一项关于适当控制食物份量的心理、社会和行为障碍的定性研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 1;10:92. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-92.
2
An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: Consumer perspectives on their effectiveness.份量估计辅助工具的评估:消费者对其有效性的看法。
Appetite. 2017 Jul 1;114:200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
3
"Doing a good thing for myself": a qualitative study of young adults' strategies for reducing takeaway food consumption.“为自己做一件好事”:一项关于年轻人减少外卖食品消费策略的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 7;19(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6731-3.
4
Family environmental factors influencing the developing behavioral controls of food intake and childhood overweight.影响食物摄入行为控制发展及儿童超重的家庭环境因素。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;48(4):893-907. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70347-3.
5
Exploring women's beliefs and perceptions about healthy eating blogs: a qualitative study.探索女性对健康饮食博客的信念和认知:一项定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 8;17(4):e87. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3504.
6
Australian consumers' views towards an environmentally sustainable eating pattern.澳大利亚消费者对环境可持续饮食模式的看法。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Oct;21(14):2714-2722. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018001192. Epub 2018 May 15.
7
"It was an education in portion size". Experience of eating a healthy diet and barriers to long term dietary change.“这是一次关于食物份量的教育”。健康饮食的体验和长期饮食改变的障碍。
Appetite. 2013 Dec;71:411-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
8
What are the main barriers to healthy eating among families? A qualitative exploration of perceptions and experiences of Tehranian men.家庭中健康饮食的主要障碍有哪些?对德黑兰男性的认知和经历进行的定性探索。
Appetite. 2015 Jun;89:291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
9
Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers' attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size.份量大小:一项针对消费者对针对份量大小的购买点干预措施的态度的定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Feb;25(1):109-20. doi: 10.1093/her/cyp051. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
10
Consumer Understanding, Perception and Interpretation of Serving Size Information on Food Labels: A Scoping Review.消费者对食品标签上份量信息的理解、感知和解释:范围综述。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 11;11(9):2189. doi: 10.3390/nu11092189.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of development methods used to define portion sizes in food-based dietary guidelines around the world.世界各地基于食物的膳食指南中用于定义食物份量的制定方法比较。
Front Nutr. 2025 Feb 12;12:1532926. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1532926. eCollection 2025.
2
Differences between the normal and perceived appropriate portion sizes of discretionary foods.可自由支配食物的正常与感知适宜份量之间的差异。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2025 May;79(5):419-426. doi: 10.1038/s41430-025-01569-2. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3
A global analysis of portion size recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines.基于食物的膳食指南中份量建议的全球分析。
Front Nutr. 2024 Nov 19;11:1476771. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1476771. eCollection 2024.
4
Portion Size Norms of Discretionary Foods and Eating Settings: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.随意食品份量规范和进食环境:一项重复横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 Oct 28;16(21):3670. doi: 10.3390/nu16213670.
5
How big is too big? A qualitative study of discretionary food portion size norms among Australian consumers.多大算大?澳大利亚消费者对随意食物份量规范的定性研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2024 Oct 24;27(1):e242. doi: 10.1017/S1368980024001964.
6
Onset of Weight Gain and Health Concerns for Men: Findings from the TAP Programme.男性体重增加和健康问题的出现:TAP 计划的研究结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):579. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010579.
7
The accuracy of portion size estimation using food images and textual descriptions of portion sizes: an evaluation study.利用食物图像和份量描述文字对份量大小进行估计的准确性:一项评估研究。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021 Dec;34(6):945-952. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12878. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Identification of Barriers to Adherence to a Weight Loss Diet in Women Using the Nominal Group Technique.采用名义群体技术识别女性遵守减肥饮食的障碍。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 6;12(12):3750. doi: 10.3390/nu12123750.
9
Integrating nutrition into the mathematics curriculum in Australian primary schools: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.将营养融入澳大利亚小学的数学课中:一项随机对照试验的方案。
Nutr J. 2020 Nov 26;19(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00640-x.
10
Law enforcement personnel are willing to change, but report influencing beliefs and barriers to optimised dietary intake.执法人员愿意做出改变,但报告了影响信念以及优化饮食摄入的障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):1638. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09716-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?为消费者提供份量指导:它有效吗?
Proc Nutr Soc. 2012 Nov;71(4):610-21. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112000766. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
2
How much should I eat? A comparison of suggested portion sizes in the UK.我应该吃多少?英国建议的份量比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Nov;15(11):2110-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012001097. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
3
Revision of food-based dietary guidelines for Ireland, Phase 1: evaluation of Ireland's food guide.爱尔兰食物指南修订版 1 期:评估爱尔兰的食物指南。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Mar;15(3):518-26. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002072. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
4
The pull of the past: when do habits persist despite conflict with motives?过去的吸引力:当习惯与动机冲突时,为什么还会持续存在?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;37(11):1428-37. doi: 10.1177/0146167211419863. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
5
Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977-2006.能量密度、份量大小和进食次数:1977-2006 年美国能量摄入增加的因素。
PLoS Med. 2011 Jun;8(6):e1001050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001050. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
6
The control of meal size in human subjects: a role for expected satiety, expected satiation and premeal planning.人类控制进食量的研究:预期饱腹感、预期满足感和餐前计划的作用。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2011 May;70(2):155-61. doi: 10.1017/S002966511000491X. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
7
Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries.六个欧洲国家对食品标签上营养信息的使用与理解。
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2010 Jun;18(3):261-277. doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
8
Implications of the foresight obesity system map for solutions to childhood obesity.前瞻性肥胖系统图谱对儿童肥胖解决方案的启示。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Feb;18 Suppl 1:S13-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.426.
9
Reflective and automatic processes in the initiation and maintenance of dietary change.在启动和维持饮食改变过程中的反思和自动过程。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S4-17. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9118-3. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
10
Portion size: review and framework for interventions.份量大小:干预措施的回顾与框架。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2009 Aug 21;6:58. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-58.