• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我应该吃多少?英国建议的份量比较。

How much should I eat? A comparison of suggested portion sizes in the UK.

机构信息

MRC Human Nutrition Research, Elsie Widdowson Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 9NL, UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2012 Nov;15(11):2110-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012001097. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980012001097
PMID:22717044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3477828/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify and compare suggested food portion sizes in UK schemes.

DESIGN

The study collated and compared suggested portion sizes from selected UK schemes intended both for general advice and weight-loss advice.

SETTING

Portion size schemes were included if they were relevant to the UK, provided actual portion size information, were intended for adults and were obtainable from the public domain in November 2010. Included schemes were from the food industry, non-governmental organisations and health-care professionals. Suggested portion sizes of foods occurring in at least one scheme for general advice and at least one scheme for weight loss were included. Own brand on-pack portion size labelling from a large UK-wide supermarket was added to represent portion size advice from UK food retailers.

SUBJECTS

Not applicable.

RESULTS

The suggested portion sizes in the weight-loss advice schemes were often concordant, as were the general advice schemes, except one general advice scheme from a non-governmental organisation which was more closely aligned with the portion sizes for weight loss. Overall there were substantial discrepancies between suggested portion sizes for muesli and crunchy breakfast cereals, rice, pasta and potatoes, meat, fish and pulses, whereas portion sizes for cooked vegetables, dried fruit, some breakfast cereals and cheese were broadly consistent.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of consistency in the portion sizes communicated to the public. An independent and authoritative scheme of suggested portion sizes for all foods, with distinct recommendations for general advice and for weight-loss advice, could be of benefit.

摘要

目的

识别和比较英国计划中建议的食物份量。

设计

本研究整理并比较了来自选定的英国计划中建议的份量大小,这些计划既用于一般建议,也用于减肥建议。

环境

如果份量计划与英国相关,提供实际份量信息,针对成年人,并且可以在 2010 年 11 月从公共领域获得,则包含该计划。包括来自食品行业、非政府组织和医疗保健专业人员的计划。包含至少有一种用于一般建议的计划和至少一种用于减肥的计划中出现的食物的建议份量。从英国一家大型连锁超市的自有品牌包装上的份量标签添加了英国食品零售商提供的份量建议。

受试者

不适用。

结果

减肥建议计划中的建议份量通常是一致的,一般建议计划也是如此,除了一个来自非政府组织的一般建议计划与减肥的份量更接近。总体而言,早餐麦片和脆麦片、米饭、意大利面和土豆、肉类、鱼类和豆类的建议份量存在很大差异,而煮熟的蔬菜、干果、一些早餐麦片和奶酪的份量则大致一致。

结论

向公众传达的份量大小不一致。对于所有食物,有一个独立和权威的建议份量计划,并有明确的一般建议和减肥建议,可以从中受益。

相似文献

1
How much should I eat? A comparison of suggested portion sizes in the UK.我应该吃多少?英国建议的份量比较。
Public Health Nutr. 2012 Nov;15(11):2110-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012001097. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
2
Comparison of consumed portion sizes and on-pack serving sizes of UK energy dense foods.比较英国高能量密度食品的食用部分大小和包装上的份量大小。
Appetite. 2019 Mar 1;134:193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.12.018. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
3
Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults.份量偏差:年轻人选择的典型份量大小。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):1412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006.
4
Average portions of foods commonly eaten by infants and toddlers in the United States.美国婴幼儿常见食物的平均食用量。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jan;106(1 Suppl 1):S66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.09.042.
5
The development of food portion sizes suitable for 4-18-year-old children used in a theoretical meal plan meeting energy and nutrient requirements.为满足能量和营养素需求,制定适合 4-18 岁儿童的理论膳食计划用食物份量。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2021 Jun;34(3):534-549. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12852. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
6
Designing the eatwell week: the application of eatwell plate advice to weekly food intake.设计健康饮食周:将健康饮食餐盘建议应用于每周食物摄入量。
Public Health Nutr. 2013 May;16(5):795-802. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004193. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
7
Is there an association between food portion size and BMI among British adolescents?英国青少年的食物份量与体重指数之间存在关联吗?
Br J Nutr. 2014 Sep 14;112(5):841-51. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514001548. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
8
Food photography II: use of food photographs for estimating portion size and the nutrient content of meals.食物摄影II:利用食物照片估算餐食的分量大小和营养成分。
Br J Nutr. 1996 Jul;76(1):31-49. doi: 10.1079/bjn19960007.
9
Estimated portion sizes of snacks and beverages differ from reference amounts and are affected by appetite status in non-obese men.零食和饮料的估计份量与参考量不同,并且在非肥胖男性中受食欲状态的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Oct;14(10):1743-51. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011000528. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
10
Does the incorporation of portion-control strategies in a behavioral program improve weight loss in a 1-year randomized controlled trial?在一项为期1年的随机对照试验中,行为计划中纳入分量控制策略是否能改善体重减轻情况?
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Mar;41(3):434-442. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2016.217. Epub 2016 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Portion Size in the Context of a Healthy, Balanced Diet: A Case Study of European Countries.在健康均衡饮食的背景下,份量大小的作用:以欧洲国家为例的个案研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;20(6):5230. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065230.
2
Gender, Age, Hunger, and Body Mass Index as Factors Influencing Portion Size Estimation and Ideal Portion Sizes.性别、年龄、饥饿程度和体重指数作为影响份量估计和理想份量大小的因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 11;13:873835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873835. eCollection 2022.
3
Impact of Portion Control Tools on Portion Size Awareness, Choice and Intake: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.分量控制工具对分量大小意识、选择和摄入的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 9;13(6):1978. doi: 10.3390/nu13061978.
4
Analysing Credibility of UK Social Media Influencers' Weight-Management Blogs: A Pilot Study.分析英国社交媒体影响者的体重管理博客的可信度:一项试点研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 3;17(23):9022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239022.
5
Where Do Adolescents Eat Less-Healthy Foods? Correspondence Analysis and Logistic Regression Results from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey.青少年在哪里吃不太健康的食物?来自英国全国饮食与营养调查的对应分析和逻辑回归结果。
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 27;12(8):2235. doi: 10.3390/nu12082235.
6
Snack Portion Sizes for Preschool Children Are Predicted by Caregiver Portion Size, Caregiver Feeding Practices and Children's Eating Traits.学龄前儿童的零食份量由照顾者的份量、照顾者的喂养行为以及儿童的饮食特征决定。
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 10;11(12):3020. doi: 10.3390/nu11123020.
7
Maternal Decisions on Portion Size and Portion Control Strategies for Snacks in Preschool Children.母亲对学龄前儿童零食份量和份量控制策略的决定。
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 9;11(12):3009. doi: 10.3390/nu11123009.
8
The Fate of Bacteria in Human Digestive Fluids: A New Perspective Into the Pathogenesis of .人类消化液中细菌的命运:对……发病机制的新视角
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1614. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01614. eCollection 2019.
9
Exploring the Experiences of People with Obesity Using Portion Control Tools-A Qualitative Study.探索使用分量控制工具的肥胖者的体验——一项定性研究。
Nutrients. 2019 May 17;11(5):1095. doi: 10.3390/nu11051095.
10
Analysis of the National Adult Nutrition Survey (Ireland) and the Food4Me Nutrition Survey Databases to Explore the Development of Food Labelling Portion Sizes for the European Union.分析爱尔兰国家成人营养调查(National Adult Nutrition Survey (Ireland))和 Food4Me 营养调查数据库,以探索为欧盟开发食品标签份量的方法。
Nutrients. 2018 Dec 20;11(1):6. doi: 10.3390/nu11010006.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased portion size leads to a sustained increase in energy intake over 4 d in normal-weight and overweight men and women.在正常体重和超重的男性及女性中,食物分量增加会导致连续4天的能量摄入量持续增加。
Br J Nutr. 2009 Aug;102(3):470-7. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508201960. Epub 2009 Feb 16.
2
Executive summary: Foresight 'Tackling Obesities: Future Choices' project.执行摘要:远见“应对肥胖:未来选择”项目。
Obes Rev. 2007 Mar;8 Suppl 1:vi-ix. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00344.x.
3
Portion distortion: typical portion sizes selected by young adults.份量偏差:年轻人选择的典型份量大小。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Sep;106(9):1412-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006.
4
Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review.含糖饮料的摄入与体重增加:一项系统综述。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):274-88. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.274.