• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开胸肺叶切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗 N0 期肺癌的淋巴结评估。

Lymph node evaluation achieved by open lobectomy compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy for N0 lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Division of Thoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1171-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.044
PMID:23915591
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy remains regarding the adequacy of the lymph node evaluation achieved by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer. This study compared the completeness of the lymph node dissection or sampling for patients undergoing lobectomy by open thoracotomy vs VATS for clinical N0 lung cancer.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of 129 patients who underwent lobectomy for clinical N0 lung carcinoma from December 2008 to January 2012.

RESULTS

Lobectomy was an open procedure in 69 patients (53.5%) and by VATS in 60 (46.5%). The VATS and open groups were well matched for age (p = 0.50) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second percentage predicted (p = 0.16). The mean pathologic tumor sizes were not significantly different (2.9 ± 0.26 vs 3.4 ± 0.25 cm, respectively; p = 0. 14). The mean number of nodes dissected in the open group was significantly higher (14.7 ± 1.3 vs. 9.9 ± 0.8 nodes; p = 0.003). In the open lobectomy group, 24.6% of the patients were upstaged to pathologic N1 or N2 compared with 10% in the VATS group (p = 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier 3-year survival was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In our hands, significantly more lymph nodes were dissected, and a higher percentage of patients were upstaged to N1/N2, during open lobectomy compared with VATS lobectomy in patients with clinical stage N0 lung cancer. Although this did not translate into improved survival at 3 years, concern is raised about the adequacy of lymph node dissection during VATS lobectomy.

摘要

背景

经电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除治疗肺癌时,淋巴结评估的充分性仍存在争议。本研究比较了开放性剖胸肺叶切除术和 VATS 治疗临床 N0 肺癌患者的淋巴结清扫或采样的完整性。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了 2008 年 12 月至 2012 年 1 月期间 129 例接受临床 N0 肺癌肺叶切除术的患者。

结果

69 例(53.5%)患者行开放性肺叶切除术,60 例(46.5%)患者行 VATS 肺叶切除术。VATS 组和开放性组在年龄(p=0.50)和 1 秒用力呼气容积占预计值的百分比(p=0.16)方面匹配良好。两组患者的平均病理肿瘤大小无显著差异(分别为 2.9 ± 0.26 cm 和 3.4 ± 0.25 cm;p=0.14)。开放性肺叶切除组切除的淋巴结数量明显较多(14.7±1.3 个 vs. 9.9±0.8 个;p=0.003)。开放性肺叶切除组中,24.6%的患者分期升级为病理 N1 或 N2,而 VATS 组为 10%(p=0.05)。两组患者的 3 年生存率无显著差异。

结论

在我们的手中,与 VATS 肺叶切除术相比,开放性肺叶切除术在治疗临床分期 N0 肺癌患者时,可明显更多地切除淋巴结,且更多的患者分期升级为 N1/N2。尽管这并未在 3 年时转化为生存获益的提高,但对 VATS 肺叶切除术中淋巴结清扫的充分性提出了关注。

相似文献

1
Lymph node evaluation achieved by open lobectomy compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy for N0 lung cancer.开胸肺叶切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗 N0 期肺癌的淋巴结评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Oct;96(4):1171-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
2
Lobectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: Effects of Cumulative Institutional Experience on Adequacy of Lymphadenectomy.电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的肺叶切除术:机构累积经验对淋巴结清扫充分性的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1116-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.073. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
3
Clinical outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy for patients with clinical N0 and pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer.胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗临床 N0 期和病理 N2 期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Mar;95(3):987-92. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.10.083. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
4
[Preliminary comparison research of thoracoscopy and thoracotomy lobectomy for clinical N0 and post-operatively pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer].[胸腔镜与开胸肺叶切除术治疗临床N0及术后病理N2非小细胞肺癌的初步对比研究]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2011 Dec 18;43(6):861-5.
5
Comparison of clinical outcomes for patients with clinical N0 and pathologic N2 non-small cell lung cancer after thoracoscopic lobectomy and open lobectomy: a retrospective analysis of 76 patients.胸腔镜肺叶切除与开胸肺叶切除治疗临床 N0 期和病理 N2 期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床结局比较:76 例回顾性分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep 15;106(4):431-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23104. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
6
Video-assisted vs open mediastinal lymphadenectomy for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.电视辅助与开放性纵隔淋巴结廓清术治疗Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌:前瞻性随机试验结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Aug;44(2):244-9; discussion 249. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs668. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer.一项全国性研究显示,在临床 I 期肺癌中,与开胸肺叶切除术相比,电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术会导致淋巴结分期升高。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):943-9; discussion 949-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Propensity-score adjusted comparison of pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.机器人辅助、电视辅助胸腔镜和开放性肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌病理性淋巴结分期上调的倾向评分调整比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Nov;158(5):1457-1466.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.113. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Lymph node evaluation in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy versus lobectomy by thoracotomy.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与开胸肺叶切除术的淋巴结评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Jun;89(6):1730-5; discussion 1736. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.094.
10
Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy vs. conventional lobectomy via open thoracotomy in patients with clinical stage IA non-small cell lung carcinoma.电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术与传统开胸肺叶切除术治疗临床ⅠA期非小细胞肺癌的对比研究
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;6(5):614-7. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.157701. Epub 2007 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Deep Learning-Based Method for Automated Identification of Thoracic Lymph Node Stations in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS): A Proof-of-Concept Study.一种基于深度学习的支气管内超声(EBUS)中胸段淋巴结站自动识别新方法:概念验证研究。
J Imaging. 2025 Jan 5;11(1):10. doi: 10.3390/jimaging11010010.
2
Prognostic value of lymph node metrics in lung squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of the SEER database.肺鳞状细胞癌中淋巴结指标的预后价值:基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec 28;22(1):351. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03639-4.
3
En Bloc Resection of a Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.
整块切除非小细胞肺癌的原发肿瘤和淋巴结。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024;30(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.24-00108.
4
Automatic Segmentation of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes and Blood Vessels in Endobronchial Ultrasound (EBUS) Images Using Deep Learning.利用深度学习自动分割支气管内超声(EBUS)图像中的纵隔淋巴结和血管
J Imaging. 2024 Aug 6;10(8):190. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10080190.
5
Lymph node dissection in lung cancer surgery: a comparison between robot-assisted vs. video-assisted thoracoscopic approach.肺癌手术中的淋巴结清扫:机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术方法的比较
Front Surg. 2024 Jun 17;11:1395884. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1395884. eCollection 2024.
6
Complete resection of left paratracheal nodes for stage IIIA disease can be achieved with robotics during left upper lobectomy after induction therapy.诱导治疗后,在机器人辅助下进行左上叶切除时,可实现对ⅢA期疾病患者左气管旁淋巴结的完全切除。
JTCVS Tech. 2023 Aug 1;22:285-289. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2023.07.018. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for lung cancer in a mixed practice medium-volume hospital: a propensity-matched study.中等规模综合医院中电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗肺癌的效果对比:一项倾向匹配研究
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Dec 5;37(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad189.
8
True Prevalence of Unforeseen N2 Disease in NSCLC: A Systematic Review + Meta-Analysis.非小细胞肺癌中意外N2期疾病的真实患病率:一项系统评价+荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;15(13):3475. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133475.
9
Robotic versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Lung Cancer: Short-Term Outcomes of a Propensity Matched Analysis.机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗肺癌:倾向评分匹配分析的短期结果
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 21;15(8):2391. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082391.
10
A Comparative Analysis of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Thoracotomy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Terms of Their Oncological Efficacy in Resection: A Systematic Review.电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗非小细胞肺癌的肿瘤切除疗效比较分析:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2022 May 29;14(5):e25443. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25443. eCollection 2022 May.