School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AL, UK.
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AL, UK; Psychology Department, Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
J Affect Disord. 2013 Nov;151(2):618-624. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Parental overprotection has commonly been implicated in the development and maintenance of childhood anxiety disorders. Overprotection has been assessed using questionnaire and observational methods interchangeably; however, the extent to which these methods access the same construct has received little attention. Edwards et al. (2008, 2010) developed a promising parent-report measure of overprotection (OP) and reported that, with parents of pre-school children, the measure correlated with observational assessments and predicted changes in child anxiety symptoms. We aimed to validate the use of the OP measure with mothers of children in middle childhood, and examine its association with child and parental anxiety.
Mothers of 90 children (60 clinically anxious, 30 non-anxious) aged 7-12 years completed the measure and engaged in a series of mildly stressful tasks with their child.
The internal reliability of the measure was good and scores correlated significantly with observations of maternal overprotection in a challenging puzzle task. Contrary to expectations, OP was not significantly associated with child anxiety status or symptoms, but was significantly associated with maternal anxiety symptoms.
Participants were predominantly from affluent social groups and of non-minority status. Overprotection is a broad construct, the use of specific sub-dimensions of behavioural constructs may be preferable.
The findings support the use of the OP measure to assess parental overprotection among 7-12 year-old children; however, they suggest that parental responses may be more closely related to the degree of parental rather than child anxiety.
父母过度保护通常与儿童焦虑障碍的发展和维持有关。过度保护已通过问卷和观察方法进行评估;然而,这些方法在多大程度上涉及相同的结构却很少受到关注。Edwards 等人(2008 年,2010 年)开发了一种有前途的父母报告过度保护(OP)的测量方法,并报告说,对于学龄前儿童的父母,该测量方法与观察评估相关,并预测儿童焦虑症状的变化。我们旨在验证该 OP 测量方法在儿童中期母亲中的使用,并研究其与儿童和父母焦虑的关联。
90 名 7-12 岁儿童的母亲(60 名患有临床焦虑症,30 名非焦虑症)完成了该测量方法,并与他们的孩子一起进行了一系列轻度压力任务。
该测量方法的内部可靠性良好,得分与在具有挑战性的拼图任务中观察到的母亲过度保护行为显著相关。与预期相反,OP 与儿童焦虑状况或症状没有显著关联,但与母亲焦虑症状显著相关。
参与者主要来自富裕的社会群体,且不属于少数族裔。过度保护是一个广泛的概念,使用行为结构的特定子维度可能更为可取。
研究结果支持使用 OP 测量方法评估 7-12 岁儿童的父母过度保护;然而,研究结果表明,父母的反应可能与父母的焦虑程度而不是儿童的焦虑程度更为密切相关。