Department of Diagnostic and Molecular Imaging, Interventional Radiology and Radiation Therapy, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Clin Radiol. 2013 Nov;68(11):e601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.05.103. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
To evaluate the problems that may arise in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) related to the presence of artefacts and pitfalls, in order to improve its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Six hundred and thirty breast MRI examinations performed using a 1.5 T magnet were analysed retrospectively. Each type of artefact that may have affected the correct interpretation of the acquired images was considered and analysed. In particular, the presence of technical artefacts, which are related to patient-dependent factors or to the examination itself, and non-technical artefacts, which are the result of inadequate and incorrect image interpretation occurring in absence of technical issues, were examined. In every case of suspicious findings, doubtful lesions were subjected to histological characterization for appropriate therapeutic planning. In the remainder of cases, patients underwent follow-up for at least 18 months.
Artefacts were found in 33% of all examinations, among those 48.6% were caused by movement, 33.6% were due to non-homogeneous or failed fat saturation, 8.7% to incorrect positioning of the patient, 7.2% to metallic artefacts, 1.4% to aliasing, and 0.5% were "zebra artefacts". When the artefact was identified in a sequence, the sequence was performed a second time after corrective measures. No artefacts affected diagnostic interpretation of the obtained images.
The present study provides a specific and precise review of the most frequent artefacts with a discussion of possible and practical solutions. A highly qualified team is required to perform accurate diagnostic tests and to limit or remove the possibility of misinterpretation.
评估乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)中因伪影和陷阱而可能出现的问题,以提高其准确性、敏感性和特异性。
回顾性分析了 630 例 1.5T 磁共振乳腺检查。考虑并分析了可能影响获得图像正确解读的每种类型的伪影。特别是,检查了与患者相关因素或检查本身相关的技术伪影和由于在没有技术问题的情况下进行不适当和不正确的图像解释而导致的非技术伪影。在所有可疑发现的情况下,对可疑病变进行组织学特征化,以进行适当的治疗计划。在其余病例中,患者至少随访 18 个月。
所有检查中有 33%存在伪影,其中 48.6%是由运动引起的,33.6%是由于不均匀或失败的脂肪饱和,8.7%是由于患者定位不正确,7.2%是由于金属伪影,1.4%是由于混叠,0.5%是“斑马伪影”。当在一个序列中发现伪影时,在采取纠正措施后,该序列会被重新执行一次。没有伪影影响获得图像的诊断解读。
本研究对最常见的伪影进行了具体而精确的回顾,并讨论了可能的实际解决方案。需要一支高素质的团队来进行准确的诊断测试,并限制或消除可能的误解。