Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Virus Res. 2013 Nov 6;177(2):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
Fluorescent proteins (FPs) are widely used in real-time single virus particle studies to visualize, track and quantify the spatial and temporal parameters of viral pathways. However, potential functional differences between the wild type and the FP-tagged virus may specifically affect particular stages in the virus life-cycle. In this work, we genetically modified the E2 spike protein of Sindbis virus (SINV) with two FPs. We inserted mApple, a red FP, or Venus, a yellow FP, at the N-terminus of the E2 protein of SINV to make SINV-Apple and SINV-Venus. Our results indicate that SINV-Apple and SINV-Venus have similar levels of infectivity and are morphologically similar to SINV-wild-type by negative stain transmission electron microscopy. Both mutants are highly fluorescent and have excellent single-particle tracking properties. However, despite these similarities, when measuring cell entry at the single-particle level, we found that SINV-Apple and SINV-Venus are different in their interaction with the cell surface and FPs are not always interchangeable. We went on to determine that the FP changes the net surface charge on the virus particles, the folding of the spike proteins, and the conformation of the spikes on the virus particle surface, ultimately leading to different cell-binding properties between SINV-Apple and SINV-Venus. Our results are consistent with recent findings that FPs may alter the biological and cellular localization properties of bacterial proteins to which they are fused.
荧光蛋白(FPs)广泛用于实时单个病毒粒子研究,以可视化、跟踪和量化病毒途径的空间和时间参数。然而,野生型和 FP 标记病毒之间的潜在功能差异可能会特别影响病毒生命周期的特定阶段。在这项工作中,我们对辛德毕斯病毒(SINV)的 E2 刺突蛋白进行了基因修饰,用两个 FP 进行了修饰。我们将 mApple(一种红色 FP)或 Venus(一种黄色 FP)插入到 SINV 的 E2 蛋白的 N 端,从而得到 SINV-Apple 和 SINV-Venus。我们的结果表明,SINV-Apple 和 SINV-Venus 的感染性相似,并且通过负染透射电子显微镜观察到它们的形态与 SINV-野生型相似。这两种突变体都具有很高的荧光性,并且具有出色的单颗粒跟踪性能。然而,尽管存在这些相似之处,但在测量单个颗粒水平的细胞进入时,我们发现 SINV-Apple 和 SINV-Venus 在与细胞表面的相互作用方面存在差异,并且 FP 并非总是可互换的。我们接着确定 FP 改变了病毒粒子的净表面电荷、刺突蛋白的折叠以及病毒粒子表面刺突的构象,最终导致 SINV-Apple 和 SINV-Venus 之间的细胞结合特性不同。我们的结果与最近的发现一致,即 FP 可能改变它们融合的细菌蛋白的生物学和细胞定位特性。