• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解和减少初级保健提供者过度医疗的概念框架。

A conceptual framework for understanding and reducing overuse by primary care providers.

机构信息

1Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Oct;70(5):451-72. doi: 10.1177/1077558713496166. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1177/1077558713496166
PMID:23916984
Abstract

Primary care providers frequently recommend, administer, or prescribe health care services that are unlikely to benefit their patients. Yet little is known about how to reduce provider overuse behavior. In the absence of a theoretically grounded causal framework, it is difficult to predict the contexts under which different types of interventions to reduce provider overuse will succeed and under which they will fail. In this article, we present a framework based on the theory of planned behavior that is designed to guide overuse research and intervention development. We describe categories of primary care provider beliefs that lead to the formation of intentions to assess the appropriateness of services, and propose factors that may affect whether the presence of assessment intentions results in an appropriate recommendation. Interventions that have been commonly used to address provider overuse behavior are reviewed within the context of the framework.

摘要

初级保健提供者经常推荐、管理或开处不太可能使患者受益的医疗服务。然而,对于如何减少提供者过度使用行为知之甚少。由于缺乏理论基础的因果框架,很难预测不同类型的减少提供者过度使用的干预措施在哪些情况下会成功,在哪些情况下会失败。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于计划行为理论的框架,旨在指导过度使用研究和干预措施的发展。我们描述了导致形成评估服务适当性意图的初级保健提供者信念类别,并提出了可能影响评估意图是否导致适当建议的因素。在该框架内审查了常用于解决提供者过度使用行为的干预措施。

相似文献

1
A conceptual framework for understanding and reducing overuse by primary care providers.理解和减少初级保健提供者过度医疗的概念框架。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Oct;70(5):451-72. doi: 10.1177/1077558713496166. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
2
Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.儿科初级保健提供者对幼儿进行牙科筛查和转诊。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e642-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1269.
3
A process for developing community consensus regarding the diagnosis and management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.一个就注意力缺陷/多动障碍的诊断和管理达成社区共识的过程。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):e97-104. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0953.
4
The state of overuse measurement: a critical review.过度使用测量的现状:批判性回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Oct;70(5):473-96. doi: 10.1177/1077558713492202. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Overuse of health care services in the United States: an understudied problem.美国医疗保健服务的过度使用:一个研究不足的问题。
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jan 23;172(2):171-8. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.772.
6
Comparison of primary physician patterns of and attitudes on emergency department use.初级医师使用急诊科的模式及态度比较。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Dec;28(12):1353-60. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318276c228.
7
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
8
Critical and honest conversations: the evidence behind the "Choosing Wisely" campaign recommendations by the American Society of Nephrology.关键而坦诚的对话:美国肾脏病学会“明智选择”活动推荐背后的证据。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Oct;7(10):1664-72. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04970512. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
9
A "Top Five" list for emergency medicine: a policy and research agenda for stewardship to improve the value of emergency care.急诊医学“五大”清单:一项政策和研究议程,旨在通过管理提高急诊护理的价值。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;31(10):1520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.共同决策干预对抑郁症初级护理的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):324-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.023. Epub 2007 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Gender Disparities in Adverse Events Resulting From Low-Value Practices in Family Practice in Spain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.性别差异在西班牙家庭医学中低价值实践导致的不良事件:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;69:1607030. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607030. eCollection 2024.
2
"It Can't Hurt!": Why Many Patients With Limited Life Expectancy Decide to Accept Lung Cancer Screening.“不会有事的!”:为什么许多预期寿命有限的肺癌患者决定接受筛查。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;22(2):95-102. doi: 10.1370/afm.3081.
3
Tackling Guideline Non-concordance: Primary Care Barriers to Incorporating Life Expectancy into Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making-A Qualitative Study.
解决指南不一致问题:将预期寿命纳入肺癌筛查决策的初级保健障碍 - 一项定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(12):2284-2291. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08705-x. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
4
Effectiveness of de-implementation strategies for low-value prescribing in secondary care: a systematic review.二级医疗中低价值处方去实施策略的有效性:一项系统综述。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 18;4(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00498-0.
5
Beyond implementation: Uncovering the parallels between de-implementation and antimicrobial stewardship.实施之外:揭示去实施与抗菌药物管理之间的相似之处。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Apr 17;3(1):e73. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.150. eCollection 2023.
6
Theories, models, and frameworks for de-implementation of low-value care: A scoping review of the literature.低价值医疗服务去实施的理论、模型与框架:文献的范围综述
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Sep 18;1:2633489520953762. doi: 10.1177/2633489520953762. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
7
Development of the SPREAD framework to support the scaling of de-implementation strategies: a mixed-methods study.发展 SPREAD 框架以支持消除策略的扩展:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 7;12(11):e062902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062902.
8
Using theories and frameworks to understand how to reduce low-value healthcare: a scoping review.利用理论和框架来理解如何减少低价值的医疗保健:范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 20;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01177-1.
9
Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals.理解低价值医疗保健及相关的去执行过程:加拿大医院选择明智干预措施的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jan 21;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07485-6.
10
Docs with their eyes on the clock? The effect of time pressures on primary care productivity.医生盯着时钟?时间压力对初级保健生产力的影响。
J Health Econ. 2021 May;77:102442. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2021.102442. Epub 2021 Feb 23.