Neri Vincenzo, Ambrosi Antonio, Fersini Alberto, Tartaglia Nicola, Lapolla Francesco
Ann Ital Chir. 2013 Jul-Aug;84(4):405-10.
Treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis has been revisited from the standpoint of either endoscopic or laparoscopic mini invasive approach. A standard diagnostic-therapeutic procedure has not been unanimously defined.
Since 1997 to 2011 we have treated 924 patients: 555 gallbladder lithiasis, 276 acute biliary pancreatitis and 93 choledocholithiasis (without pancreatitis). We have compared, by the review of the literature, our results of two stage endoscopic stones removal followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus one stage laparo-endoscopic rendezvous technique/VLC and laparoscopic approach alone.
In our experience endoscopic removal of stones have been performed in 82 patients (88.17%); 11 patients (11.82%),not eligible for endoscopic approach, have been submitted to laparotomic therapy. In sum preoperative ERCP/ES with CBD cleaning followed by VLC, not with standing the valid results of laparoscopic approach alone remains the strategy more frequently applied in clinical practice, because the good results.
The results of the treatment of CBD lithiasis of sequential laparo-endoscopic approach (two or one stage) and of laparoscopic approach alone are roughly overlappable. Therefore the first has remained the treatment of reference and comparison in all the clinical evaluation of different procedure.
从内镜或腹腔镜微创方法的角度对胆囊胆总管结石的治疗进行了重新审视。尚未统一界定标准的诊断治疗程序。
自1997年至2011年,我们共治疗了924例患者:555例胆囊结石、276例急性胆源性胰腺炎和93例胆总管结石(无胰腺炎)。通过文献回顾,我们比较了两阶段内镜下结石清除后行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与一阶段腹腔镜内镜会师技术/胆囊切开取石术及单纯腹腔镜手术的结果。
根据我们的经验,82例患者(88.17%)接受了内镜下结石清除;11例患者(11.82%)因不符合内镜治疗条件而接受了开腹治疗。总体而言,术前内镜逆行胰胆管造影/内镜括约肌切开术联合胆总管清理后行胆囊切开取石术,尽管单纯腹腔镜手术也有良好效果,但仍是临床实践中更常用的策略。
序贯性腹腔镜内镜联合手术(两阶段或一阶段)和单纯腹腔镜手术治疗胆总管结石的结果大致相同。因此,在所有不同手术的临床评估中,前者一直是参考和比较的治疗方法。