Tibon Roni, Levy Daniel A
School of Psychology and Unit for Applied Neuroscience, The Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, 46683, Israel.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Mar;14(1):220-35. doi: 10.3758/s13415-013-0199-x.
Little is known about the time course of processes supporting episodic cued recall. To examine these processes, we recorded event-related scalp electrical potentials during episodic cued recall following pair-associate learning of unimodal object-picture pairs and crossmodal object-picture and sound pairs. Successful cued recall of unimodal associates was characterized by markedly early scalp potential differences over frontal areas, while cued recall of both unimodal and crossmodal associates were reflected by subsequent differences recorded over frontal and parietal areas. Notably, unimodal cued recall success divergences over frontal areas were apparent in a time window generally assumed to reflect the operation of familiarity but not recollection processes, raising the possibility that retrieval success effects in that temporal window may reflect additional mnemonic processes beyond familiarity. Furthermore, parietal scalp potential recall success differences, which did not distinguish between crossmodal and unimodal tasks, seemingly support attentional or buffer accounts of posterior parietal mnemonic function but appear to constrain signal accumulation, expectation, or representational accounts.
关于支持情景线索回忆的过程的时间进程,我们所知甚少。为了研究这些过程,我们在对单峰物体-图片对以及跨峰物体-图片和声音对进行配对联想学习后的情景线索回忆过程中,记录了与事件相关的头皮电位。单峰联想的成功线索回忆的特征是额叶区域明显较早出现头皮电位差异,而单峰和跨峰联想的线索回忆都通过额叶和顶叶区域随后记录到的差异得以体现。值得注意的是,在通常被认为反映熟悉度而非回忆过程的时间窗口内,额叶区域单峰线索回忆成功的差异就已很明显,这增加了在该时间窗口内检索成功效应可能反映出熟悉度之外的其他记忆过程的可能性。此外,顶叶头皮电位回忆成功差异在跨峰和单峰任务之间并无区分,这似乎支持了顶叶后部记忆功能的注意力或缓冲解释,但似乎限制了信号积累、期望或表征解释。