Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;42(3):769-80. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyt071.
We assessed the differential and sequential effects of a Government of India conditional cash transfer scheme for the socio-economically disadvantaged (Janani Suraksha Yojana; JSY) and the strengthening of the primary health centre (PHC) network to provide 24/7 obstetric care in promoting institutional deliveries.
This study used 7796 births from the Ballabgarh Health and Demographic Surveillance Site between April 2006 and March 2010 when both schemes were implemented in a staggered manner. The multiple baseline design took advantage of interventions separated by time and geographical zone to compute difference in differences in the rate of institutional deliveries. Logistic regression was used to estimate increases in the odds of institutional deliveries after adjustment for caste and maternal education.
Compared with villages with poor access, institutional deliveries nearly doubled among villages with access to 24/7 delivery services; odds ratio (OR) 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3, 2.6]. Introduction of JSY in villages with poor access resulted in a 1.4-fold (95% CI: 1.1, 1.8) increase in institutional deliveries and a 1.1-fold (95% CI: 0.9, 1.4) increase in villages served by PHCs 24/7. However, the introduction of PHC 24/7 care to villages served by JSY doubled the rate of institutional deliveries; OR 2.1 (95% CI: 1.5, 2.8). Among the disadvantaged, institutional deliveries increased by 34.4%, compared with 24.8% among the non-disadvantaged. Introduction of PHC 24/7 care in this group increased institutional deliveries 4-fold; OR 4.2 (95% CI: 1.9, 9.0) compared with 3-fold for JSY alone; OR 3.2 (95% CI: 1.8, 5.6).
Both demand and supply side strategies are effective and promote equity. Improving service delivery in a population previously primed by demand side intervention appears to be the most useful.
我们评估了印度政府针对社会经济弱势群体的有条件现金转移计划(Janani Suraksha Yojana;JSY)和加强初级保健中心(PHC)网络以提供 24/7 产科护理以促进机构分娩的差异化和顺序效应。
本研究使用了 2006 年 4 月至 2010 年 3 月期间在巴拉尔加健康和人口监测点的 7796 例分娩,当时这两个计划以交错的方式实施。多基线设计利用了时间和地理区域分开的干预措施,计算了机构分娩率的差异中的差异。使用逻辑回归在调整种姓和母亲教育后,估计了机构分娩的几率增加。
与获得机会较差的村庄相比,获得 24/7 分娩服务的村庄的机构分娩率几乎翻了一番;比值比(OR)为 1.9[95%置信区间(CI):1.3,2.6]。在获得机会较差的村庄引入 JSY 导致机构分娩率增加 1.4 倍(95%CI:1.1,1.8),而接受 PHC 24/7 服务的村庄则增加 1.1 倍(95%CI:0.9,1.4)。然而,向 JSY 服务的村庄引入 PHC 24/7 护理将机构分娩率翻了一番;OR 2.1(95%CI:1.5,2.8)。在弱势群体中,机构分娩率增加了 34.4%,而非弱势群体中增加了 24.8%。在该群体中引入 PHC 24/7 护理将机构分娩率增加了 4 倍;OR 4.2(95%CI:1.9,9.0),而单独 JSY 则增加了 3 倍;OR 3.2(95%CI:1.8,5.6)。
需求方和供应方策略均有效,并促进公平。在以前由需求方干预措施引发的人群中提高服务提供水平似乎最为有用。