• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CONSORT-EHEALTH:为作者和编辑制定一份清单,以改善基于网络和移动随机对照试验报告的实施情况。

CONSORT-EHEALTH: implementation of a checklist for authors and editors to improve reporting of web-based and mobile randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Eysenbach Gunther

机构信息

Centre for Global eHealth Innovation & Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:657-61.

PMID:23920638
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials of web-based and mobile interventions pose very specific issues and challenges. A set of best practices on how to conduct and report such trials was recently summarized in the CONSORT-EHEALTH statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials of Electronic and Mobile HEalth Applications and onLine TeleHealth), published in August 2011 as draft and in December 2011 as journal article (V1.6.1). The purpose of this presentation is to review the results of the pilot implementation at the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), a leading eHealth journal, where reporting of trials in accordance with CONSORT-EHEALTH became mandatory in late 2011.

METHODS

Authors of all randomized trials submitted to JMIR were asked to complete an electronic questionnaire, which involved copying pertinent manuscript sections into a CONSORT EHEALTH database form, were asked to score the importance of CONSORT EHEALTH items, and were asked to provide narrative feedback on the value of the process.

RESULTS

Between August 2011 and November 2012, 67 randomized trials were submitted, of which 61 were intended for publication in JMIR. Authors reported that it took between 1 and 16 hours to complete the checklist including making required changes to their manuscripts. 72% (48/67) of authors reported they made minor changes to the manuscript, 6% (4/67) made major changes. Most authors felt it was a useful process that improved their manuscripts: 63% (42/67) said it improved their manuscript, 13% (9/67) said it did not, 12% (8/67) indicated that it had improved a little.

CONCLUSIONS

The CONSORT EHEALTH statement and checklist appeared successful in improving the quality of reporting. The checklist should be endorsed and used by authors and editors of other journals.

摘要

背景

基于网络和移动设备的干预措施的随机试验带来了非常特殊的问题和挑战。2011年8月以草案形式、2011年12月以期刊文章形式(V1.6.1)发表的《CONSORT-EHEALTH声明》(电子和移动健康应用及在线远程医疗试验报告统一标准)最近总结了一套关于如何开展和报告此类试验的最佳实践。本报告的目的是回顾在领先的电子健康期刊《医学互联网研究杂志》(JMIR)进行的试点实施结果,2011年末在该杂志按照CONSORT-EHEALTH报告试验成为强制性要求。

方法

要求所有提交给JMIR的随机试验的作者完成一份电子问卷,其中包括将相关的稿件部分复制到CONSORT EHEALTH数据库表格中,要求对CONSORT EHEALTH项目的重要性进行评分,并要求提供关于该过程价值的叙述性反馈。

结果

在2011年8月至2012年11月期间,提交了67项随机试验,其中61项打算在JMIR上发表。作者报告说,完成清单(包括对手稿进行必要修改)花费的时间在1至16小时之间。72%(48/67)的作者报告他们对手稿进行了小的修改,6%(4/67)进行了重大修改。大多数作者认为这是一个有用的过程,改进了他们的稿件:63%(42/67)的人说这改进了他们的稿件,13%(9/67)的人说没有,12%(8/67)表示有一点改进。

结论

CONSORT EHEALTH声明和清单似乎成功地提高了报告质量。该清单应得到其他期刊的作者和编辑的认可并使用。

相似文献

1
CONSORT-EHEALTH: implementation of a checklist for authors and editors to improve reporting of web-based and mobile randomized controlled trials.CONSORT-EHEALTH:为作者和编辑制定一份清单,以改善基于网络和移动随机对照试验报告的实施情况。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:657-61.
2
CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions.CONSORT-EHEALTH:改进并规范基于网络和移动健康干预措施的评估报告。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.
3
Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.试验报告的统一标准(CONSORT)以及医学期刊上发表的随机对照试验(RCT)的报告完整性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):MR000030. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000030.pub2.
4
[A standard method for reporting ramdomized medical scientific research; the 'Consolidation of the standards of reporting trials' (CONSORT)].一种报告随机医学科研的标准方法;“试验报告标准合并”(CONSORT)
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 May 9;142(19):1089-91.
5
Editorial policy and the reporting of randomized controlled trials: a survey of instructions for authors and assessment of trial reports in Indian medical journals (2004-05).编辑政策与随机对照试验报告:对印度医学期刊作者指南的调查及试验报告评估(2004 - 2005年)
Natl Med J India. 2008 Mar-Apr;21(2):62-8.
6
[The CONSORT statement (CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials)].[《CONSORT 声明》(试验报告统一标准)]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Jun-Jul;140(6-7):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annder.2013.04.091. Epub 2013 May 31.
7
Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?摘要的CONSORT清单能否提高临床路径随机对照试验报告的质量?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):827-33. doi: 10.1111/jep.12200. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
8
The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the CONSORT statement.REFLECT 陈述:通过修改 CONSORT 陈述为畜牧业和食品安全的随机对照试验创建报告指南的方法和流程。
Zoonoses Public Health. 2010 Mar;57(2):95-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01311.x. Epub 2010 Jan 12.
9
Quality of reports on randomized controlled trials published in Iranian journals: application of the new version of consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).伊朗期刊发表的随机对照试验报告质量:新版本临床试验报告统一标准(CONSORT)的应用。
Arch Iran Med. 2013 Jan;16(1):20-2.
10
Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals.七本排名最高的麻醉学杂志中随机对照试验摘要的报告质量
Trials. 2018 Oct 29;19(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2976-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A pragmatic double blind remote pilot feasibility randomised controlled trial of a self-management app for people with Sjögren disease.一项针对干燥综合征患者的自我管理应用程序的实用双盲远程试点可行性随机对照试验。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 3;7:1549093. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1549093. eCollection 2025.
2
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of iCanWork: Theory-Guided Return-to-Work Intervention for Individuals Touched by Cancer.iCanWork的试点随机对照试验:针对受癌症影响个体的理论指导重返工作干预
Curr Oncol. 2025 May 1;32(5):266. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32050266.
3
Potential Harms of Feedback After Web-Based Depression Screening: Secondary Analysis of Negative Effects in the Randomized Controlled DISCOVER Trial.
基于网络的抑郁症筛查后反馈的潜在危害:随机对照DISCOVER试验中负面影响的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 30;27:e59476. doi: 10.2196/59476.
4
SPARK: an mHealth intervention for self-management and treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus in Sweden - protocol for a randomised controlled trial.SPARK:瑞典一项用于妊娠期糖尿病自我管理和治疗的移动健康干预措施——一项随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e089355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089355.
5
Evaluation of a Musculoskeletal Digital Assessment Routing Tool (DART): Crossover Noninferiority Randomized Pilot Trial.肌肉骨骼数字评估路由工具(DART)的评估:交叉非劣效性随机试点试验。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jul 30;8:e56715. doi: 10.2196/56715.
6
Strategies, processes, outcomes, and costs of implementing experience sampling-based monitoring in routine mental health care in four European countries: study protocol for the IMMERSE effectiveness-implementation study.在四个欧洲国家的常规精神卫生保健中实施基于经验采样监测的策略、流程、结果和成本:IMMERSE 效果实施研究的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):465. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05839-4.
7
Feasibility of a mobile health app-based self-management program for Chinese patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy: A randomized controlled pilot study.基于移动健康应用程序的自我管理项目对接受化疗的中国乳腺癌患者的可行性:一项随机对照试验研究。
Digit Health. 2024 Feb 25;10:20552076241231560. doi: 10.1177/20552076241231560. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Effectiveness of a universal personalized intervention for the prevention of anxiety disorders: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial (the prevANS project).一种预防焦虑症的通用个性化干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案(prevANS项目)
Internet Interv. 2023 Jun 22;34:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100640. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Do age, gender, and education modify the effectiveness of app-delivered and tailored self-management support among adults with low back pain?-Secondary analysis of the selfBACK randomised controlled trial.年龄、性别和教育程度是否会改变应用程序提供的量身定制的自我管理支持对腰痛成年人的有效性?——selfBACK随机对照试验的二次分析。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Sep 22;2(9):e0000302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000302. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial.根治性前列腺切除术后患者在标准护理基础上增加基于网络和移动设备的自我护理支持的效果:随机对照试验
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Sep 6;9:e44320. doi: 10.2196/44320.