• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用程序概要——医疗应用程序的标准报告

App-synopsis - standard reporting for medical apps.

作者信息

Albrecht Urs-Vito, von Jan Ute, Jungnickel Tobias, Pramann Oliver

机构信息

Peter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1154.

PMID:23920928
Abstract

The market for medical apps is rapidly expanding - both for professional use as well as for patient centered apps. There are numerous medical apps, but relevant information about their limitations and dangers is rarely available. In an exemplary evaluation of n=8 medical apps, deficits regarding data integrity, one half had security and privacy issues. Since standard users usually have neither the equipment, know-how nor time for such analyses before entrusting them with their data, ideally, manufacturers should provide information regarding the functionality and limits of their products. Mandatory information should cover data management, data protection and privacy issues. To increase transparency, a standardized reporting tool in the form of an app synopsis could be helpful for providing the necessary information.

摘要

医疗应用市场正在迅速扩张——无论是专业用途的应用还是以患者为中心的应用。医疗应用数不胜数,但关于其局限性和风险的相关信息却鲜有可得。在一项对8款医疗应用的典型评估中,数据完整性存在缺陷,其中一半存在安全和隐私问题。由于普通用户在将数据托付给这些应用之前,通常既没有设备、专业知识,也没有时间进行此类分析,因此理想情况下,制造商应提供有关其产品功能和局限性的信息。强制性信息应涵盖数据管理、数据保护和隐私问题。为提高透明度,以应用摘要形式呈现的标准化报告工具可能有助于提供必要信息。

相似文献

1
App-synopsis - standard reporting for medical apps.应用程序概要——医疗应用程序的标准报告
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1154.
2
Standard reporting for medical apps.医疗应用程序的标准报告。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;190:201-3.
3
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.从安全角度看移动健康应用的使用障碍和促进因素:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223. doi: 10.2196/11223.
4
Privacy and security in mobile health apps: a review and recommendations.移动健康应用中的隐私与安全:综述与建议
J Med Syst. 2015 Jan;39(1):181. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0181-3. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
5
Security of electronic mental health communication and record-keeping in the digital age.数字时代电子心理健康通信与记录保存的安全性。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;77(2):262-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14r09506.
6
Display methods of electronic patient record screens: patient privacy concerns.电子病历屏幕的显示方法:患者隐私问题。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;192:1029.
7
Data sharing practices of medicines related apps and the mobile ecosystem: traffic, content, and network analysis.药品相关应用程序和移动生态系统的数据共享实践:流量、内容和网络分析。
BMJ. 2019 Mar 20;364:l920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l920.
8
Getting the message, securely.安全地获取信息。
Healthc Inform. 2012 Feb;29(2):52, 54, 56 passim.
9
The development of an application for data privacy by applying an audit repository based on IHE ATNA.通过应用基于IHE ATNA的审核存储库来开发数据隐私应用程序。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;198:219-25.
10
How private is your mental health app data? An empirical study of mental health app privacy policies and practices.你的心理健康应用数据有多隐私?一项关于心理健康应用隐私政策和实践的实证研究。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Alberta Rating Index for Apps: Study of Reliability and Validity.阿尔伯塔应用评分指数:信度和效度研究。
Can J Occup Ther. 2022 Sep;89(3):326-338. doi: 10.1177/00084174221085451. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
2
Analysis of Secure Apps for Daily Clinical Use by German Orthopedic Surgeons: Searching for the "Needle in a Haystack".德国骨科医生日常临床使用的安全应用程序分析:大海捞针式的寻找
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 7;8(5):e17085. doi: 10.2196/17085.
3
Quality Principles of App Description Texts and Their Significance in Deciding to Use Health Apps as Assessed by Medical Students: Survey Study.
应用描述文本的质量原则及其对医学生使用健康类应用程序决策的意义评估:调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Feb 27;7(2):e13375. doi: 10.2196/13375.
4
Digital technologies as biomarkers, clinical outcomes assessment, and recruitment tools in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.数字技术在阿尔茨海默病临床试验中作为生物标志物、临床结局评估和招募工具的应用。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 May 24;4:234-242. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.04.003. eCollection 2018.
5
Smartphone apps for calculating insulin dose: a systematic assessment.用于计算胰岛素剂量的智能手机应用程序:一项系统评估。
BMC Med. 2015 May 6;13:106. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0314-7.
6
The evolution of mobile apps for asthma: an updated systematic assessment of content and tools.用于哮喘的移动应用程序的演变:对内容和工具的最新系统评估
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 23;13:58. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0303-x.
7
Transparency of health-apps for trust and decision making.健康应用程序的透明度促进信任与决策
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Dec 30;15(12):e277. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2981.