• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)联合抢先使用普乐沙福与超分割环磷酰胺(CY)联合G-CSF用于多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞动员:有效性、安全性及成本分析

G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.

作者信息

Antar A, Otrock Z K, Kharfan-Dabaja M A, Ghaddara H A, Kreidieh N, Mahfouz R, Bazarbachi A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;50(6):813-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.23. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1038/bmt.2015.23
PMID:25751646
Abstract

The optimal stem cell mobilization regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains undefined. We retrospectively compared our experience in hematopoietic cell mobilization in 83 MM patients using fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF with G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor. All patients in the CY group (n=56) received fractionated high-dose CY (5 g/m(2) divided into five doses of 1 g/m(2) every 3 h) with G-CSF. All patients in the plerixafor group (n=27) received G-CSF and plerixafor preemptively based on an established algorithm. Compared with plerixafor, CY use was associated with higher total CD34+ cell yield (7.5 × 10(6) vs 15.5 × 10(6) cells/kg, P=0.005). All patients in both groups yielded ⩾4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Conversely, CY use was associated with high frequency of febrile neutropenia, blood and platelet transfusions need and hospitalizations. The average total cost of mobilization in Lebanon was slightly higher in the plerixafor group ($7886 vs $7536; P=0.16). Our data indicate robust stem cell mobilization in MM patients with either fractionated high-dose CY and G-CSF or G-CSF alone with preemptive plerixafor. The chemo-mobilization approach was associated with twofold stem cell yield, slightly lower cost but significantly increased toxicity.

摘要

多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的最佳干细胞动员方案仍未明确。我们回顾性比较了83例MM患者采用分次大剂量环磷酰胺(CY)联合粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)与G-CSF加抢先使用普乐沙福进行造血细胞动员的经验。CY组的所有患者(n = 56)接受分次大剂量CY(5 g/m²,分为5剂,每3小时1 g/m²)联合G-CSF。普乐沙福组的所有患者(n = 27)根据既定算法抢先接受G-CSF和普乐沙福。与普乐沙福相比,使用CY与更高的总CD34⁺细胞产量相关(7.5×10⁶对15.5×10⁶细胞/kg,P = 0.005)。两组所有患者的CD34⁺细胞产量均≥4×10⁶细胞/kg。相反,使用CY与发热性中性粒细胞减少、血液和血小板输注需求及住院的高频率相关。黎巴嫩动员的平均总成本在普乐沙福组略高(7886美元对7536美元;P = 0.16)。我们的数据表明,采用分次大剂量CY联合G-CSF或单独使用G-CSF加抢先使用普乐沙福均可使MM患者实现强劲的干细胞动员。化疗动员方法与干细胞产量增加两倍、成本略低但毒性显著增加相关。

相似文献

1
G-CSF plus preemptive plerixafor vs hyperfractionated CY plus G-CSF for autologous stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: effectiveness, safety and cost analysis.粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)联合抢先使用普乐沙福与超分割环磷酰胺(CY)联合G-CSF用于多发性骨髓瘤自体干细胞动员:有效性、安全性及成本分析
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;50(6):813-7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.23. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
2
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma patients treat in the novel therapy-era with plerixafor and G-CSF has superior efficacy but significantly higher costs compared to mobilization with low-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.在新型治疗时代,使用普乐沙福和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员多发性骨髓瘤患者的外周血干细胞,与使用低剂量环磷酰胺和G-CSF进行动员相比,具有更高的疗效,但成本显著更高。
J Clin Apher. 2013 Oct;28(5):359-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21280. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.与培洛昔康和 G-CSF 相比,新型疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者中,中剂量环磷酰胺和 G-CSF 动员 PBSC 的疗效相当,但成本更低。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Oct;48(10):1279-84. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.52. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
Plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma and low peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count: results of a subset analysis of a randomized trial.培洛昔福联合粒细胞集落刺激因子与安慰剂联合粒细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤且外周血 CD34+细胞计数低的患者中的 CD34+造血干细胞:一项随机试验的亚组分析结果。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1564-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
5
Upfront plerixafor plus G-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma: efficacy and cost analysis study.在多发性骨髓瘤中,用于干细胞动员的初治普乐沙福加粒细胞集落刺激因子与环磷酰胺加粒细胞集落刺激因子的疗效和成本分析研究。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Apr;51(4):546-52. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.322. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Cost analysis of a randomized stem cell mobilization study in multiple myeloma.
Ann Hematol. 2016 Oct;95(10):1653-9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2772-1. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Plerixafor on-demand combined with chemotherapy and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: significant improvement in peripheral blood stem cells mobilization and harvest with no increase in costs.按需使用普乐沙福联合化疗和粒细胞集落刺激因子:在外周血干细胞动员和采集方面有显著改善,且不增加成本。
Br J Haematol. 2014 Jan;164(1):113-23. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12606. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
8
Pegfilgrastim- versus filgrastim-based autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in the setting of preemptive use of plerixafor: efficacy and cost analysis.在预先使用普乐沙福的情况下,培格非格司亭与非格司亭为基础的自体造血干细胞动员:疗效和成本分析。
Transfusion. 2012 Nov;52(11):2375-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03579.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
9
Phase I/II Study of Intravenous Plerixafor Added to a Mobilization Regimen of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Collection.淋巴瘤患者自体干细胞采集时,粒细胞集落刺激因子联合静脉注射普乐沙福的 I/II 期研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Aug;23(8):1282-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.04.024. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Beyond CD34+ cell dose: impact of method of peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilization (granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF], G-CSF plus plerixafor, or cyclophosphamide G-CSF/granulocyte-macrophage [GM]-CSF) on number of colony-forming unit-GM, engraftment, and Day +100 hematopoietic graft function.超越 CD34+ 细胞剂量:外周血造血干细胞动员方法(粒细胞集落刺激因子[G-CSF]、G-CSF 加plerixafor 或环磷酰胺 G-CSF/粒细胞-巨噬细胞[GM]-CSF)对集落形成单位-GM 数量、植入和第 100 天造血移植物功能的影响。
Transfusion. 2011 Sep;51(9):1995-2000. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03085.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Phase II study of novel CXCR2 agonist and Plerixafor for rapid stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.新型 CXCR2 激动剂和普乐沙福在多发性骨髓瘤患者中快速动员干细胞的 II 期研究。
Blood Cancer J. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):173. doi: 10.1038/s41408-024-01152-1.
2
Evaluation of efficacy and safety in the use of cytarabine for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in a reference hospital in northeastern Brazil.在巴西东北部一家参考医院中,对阿糖胞苷用于动员造血干细胞的有效性和安全性进行评估。
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2024 Oct-Dec;46(4):428-433. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2023.08.007. Epub 2023 Oct 29.
3
Efficacy, safety, and cost of mobilization strategies in multiple myeloma: a prospective, observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparable efficacy and lower cost of PBSC mobilization with intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and G-CSF compared with plerixafor and G-CSF in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel therapies.与培洛昔康和 G-CSF 相比,新型疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者中,中剂量环磷酰胺和 G-CSF 动员 PBSC 的疗效相当,但成本更低。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Oct;48(10):1279-84. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2013.52. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-adapted algorithm of plerixafor use for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization.风险适应算法在培瑞克昔福用于自体外周血造血干细胞动员中的成本效果分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Jan;19(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.010. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
3
多发性骨髓瘤动员策略的疗效、安全性及成本:一项前瞻性观察性研究
Haematologica. 2023 Aug 1;108(8):2249-2254. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.282269.
4
Plerixafor use in autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: Experience from a single center in Southern India.普乐沙福用于自体造血干细胞动员:来自印度南部单一中心的经验。
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2022 Jan-Jun;16(1):7-14. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_106_21. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
5
Efficacy of hematopoietic stem cell mobilization regimens in patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.造血干细胞动员方案在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022 Mar 22;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-02802-6.
6
Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide +/- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor +/- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era.多发性骨髓瘤中的干细胞动员:来那度胺时代环磷酰胺 +/- 培洛昔芬与粒细胞集落刺激因子 +/- 培洛昔芬的安全性和疗效比较。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Jul;27(7):590.e1-590.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
7
Mobilization of Hematopoietic Stem Cells into Peripheral Blood for Autologous Transplantation Seems Less Efficacious in Poor Mobilizers with the Use of a Biosimilar of Filgrastim and Plerixafor: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis.对于动员效果不佳的患者,使用非格司亭生物类似药和普乐沙福将造血干细胞动员至外周血用于自体移植似乎效果较差:一项回顾性比较分析。
Oncol Ther. 2020 Dec;8(2):311-324. doi: 10.1007/s40487-020-00115-3. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
Costs associated with management of non-communicable diseases in the Arab Region: a scoping review.阿拉伯区域非传染性疾病管理相关成本:范围综述。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020410. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020410.
9
Comparison of two dose levels of cyclophosphamide for successful stem cell mobilization in myeloma patients.比较两种剂量环磷酰胺对骨髓瘤患者成功进行干细胞动员的效果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;142(12):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2270-9. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
Toward a more rational policy for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.
迈向更合理的自体造血干细胞动员政策。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Oct;18(10):1468-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
4
Growth factor plus preemptive ('just-in-time') plerixafor successfully mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells in multiple myeloma patients despite prior lenalidomide exposure.尽管先前使用过来那度胺,但生长因子加预防性(“及时”)plerixafor 成功动员多发性骨髓瘤患者的造血干细胞。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 Nov;47(11):1403-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.60. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
5
Intermediate-dose versus low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel induction therapies.新型诱导疗法治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者的外周血造血干细胞动员:中剂量与低剂量环磷酰胺和粒细胞集落刺激因子。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Jul;18(7):1128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
6
Plerixafor added to chemotherapy plus G-CSF is safe and allows adequate PBSC collection in predicted poor mobilizer patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma.培洛昔芳联合化疗和 G-CSF 用于预测不佳的多发性骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤动员不良患者,安全且可充分采集 PBSC。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012 Feb;18(2):241-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
7
Efficacy and cost-benefit analysis of risk-adaptive use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization.风险适应性使用普乐沙福进行自体造血祖细胞动员的疗效和成本效益分析。
Transfusion. 2012 Jan;52(1):55-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03206.x. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
8
Growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor is superior to CY and growth factor for autologous hematopoietic stem cells mobilization.培洛利昔(plerixafor)联合生长因子与环磷酰胺和生长因子相比,更有利于自体造血干细胞的动员。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Apr;46(4):523-8. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.170. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
9
Plerixafor (Mozobil) for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide.普乐沙福(莫佐比)用于治疗先前接受来那度胺治疗的多发性骨髓瘤患者的干细胞动员。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Mar;46(3):350-5. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.118. Epub 2010 May 17.
10
Development and validation of a decision-making algorithm to guide the use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization.开发和验证一种决策算法,以指导使用plerixafor 进行自体造血干细胞动员。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Jan;46(1):64-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.78. Epub 2010 Apr 12.