Irajpour Alireza, Kaji Nariman Sadeghi, Nazari Fatemeh, Azizkhani Reza, Zadeh Akbar Hassan
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2012 Nov;17(7):530-3.
Fractures of femur are among the most important causes of mortality in musculoskeletal injuries. Owning to lack of adequate research to compare various techniques of fracture stabilization, there has not yet been an agreement over a protocol to utilize a specific type of splint for femoral fracture immobilization. This study was thus conducted to compare the effects of simple and traction splints on pain intensityimmediately after and at the 1(st), 6(th), and 12(th)h after splinting among patients with femur fracture in the centers affiliated to Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Isfahan, Iran).
This quasi-experimental study was performed on 32 patients with femur fractures. Prehospital emergency ambulances were divided into two groups of simple and traction splints using a table of random numbers. Continuous convenient sampling was employed in each group to use either a simple or a traction splint for the patients with femur fractures. Pain intensity of the patients was then measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS) immediately, 1 h, 6 h, and 12 h after splinting. The effects of the two techniques were finally compared.
After splinting, pain intensity decreased significantly in both groups (P = 0.0001 in both groups). The reductions were significantly more in the traction splint group at the 1(st), 6(th)(P = 0.0001), and 12(th)h after splinting (P = 0.02) compared with the simple splint group. There was no significant difference in pain intensity immediately after splintingbetween the two groups (P = 0.441).
The significant difference in pain reduction between the simple and traction splint groups at the 1(st), 6(th), and 12(th)h after splinting emphasizes the superiority of traction splints.
股骨骨折是肌肉骨骼损伤中最重要的致死原因之一。由于缺乏足够的研究来比较各种骨折固定技术,目前尚未就使用特定类型夹板固定股骨骨折的方案达成共识。因此,本研究旨在比较简易夹板和牵引夹板对伊朗伊斯法罕医科大学附属医院股骨骨折患者夹板固定后即刻、第1小时、第6小时和第12小时疼痛强度的影响。
本准实验研究对32例股骨骨折患者进行。使用随机数字表将院前急救救护车分为简易夹板组和牵引夹板组。每组采用连续方便抽样法,为股骨骨折患者使用简易夹板或牵引夹板。然后在夹板固定后即刻、1小时、6小时和12小时,通过视觉模拟评分法(VAS)测量患者的疼痛强度。最后比较两种技术的效果。
夹板固定后,两组患者的疼痛强度均显著降低(两组P均=0.0001)。与简易夹板组相比,牵引夹板组在夹板固定后第1小时、第6小时(P = 0.0001)和第12小时(P = 0.02)的疼痛强度降低更为显著。两组在夹板固定后即刻的疼痛强度无显著差异(P = 0.441)。
简易夹板组和牵引夹板组在夹板固定后第1小时、第6小时和第12小时疼痛减轻程度的显著差异,强调了牵引夹板的优越性。