Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U896, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 29;8(7):e69613. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069613. Print 2013.
We assessed the contribution of antibody internalization in the efficacy and toxicity of intraperitoneal α-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of small volume carcinomatosis using (212)Pb-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target HER2 (internalizing) or CEA (non-internalizing) receptors.
Athymic nude mice bearing 2-3 mm intraperitoneal tumor xenografts were intraperitoneally injected with similar activities (370, 740 and 1480 kBq; 37 MBq/mg) of (212)Pb-labeled 35A7 (anti-CEA), trastuzumab (anti-HER2) or PX (non-specific) mAbs, or with equivalent amounts of unlabeled mAbs, or with NaCl. Tumor volume was monitored by bioluminescence and survival was reported. Hematologic toxicity and body weight were assessed. Biodistribution of (212)Pb-labeled mAbs and absorbed dose-effect relationships using MIRD formalism were established.
Transient hematological toxicity, as revealed by white blood cells and platelets numbering, was reported in mice treated with the highest activities of (212)Pb-labeled mAbs. The median survival (MS) was significantly higher in mice injected with 1.48 MBq of (212)Pb-35A7 (non-internalizing mAbs) (MS = 94 days) than in animals treated with the same activity of (212)Pb-PX mAbs or with NaCl (MS = 18 days). MS was even not reached after 130 days when follow-up was discontinued in mice treated with 1.48 MBq of (212)Pb-trastuzumab. The later efficacy was unexpected since final absorbed dose resulting from injection of 1.48 MBq, was higher for (212)Pb-35A7 (35.5 Gy) than for (212)Pb-trastuzumab (27.6 Gy). These results also highlight the lack of absorbed dose-effect relationship when mean absorbed dose was calculated using MIRD formalism and the requirement to perform small-scale dosimetry.
These data indicate that it might be an advantage of using internalizing anti-HER2 compared with non-internalizing anti-CEA (212)Pb-labeled mAbs in the therapy of small volume xenograft tumors. They support clinical investigations of (212)Pb-mAbs RIT as an adjuvant treatment after cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
本研究旨在评估抗体内化在小体积癌性腹水的腹腔α-放射性免疫治疗(RIT)中的疗效和毒性中的作用,使用针对 HER2(内化)或 CEA(非内化)受体的(212)Pb 标记单克隆抗体(mAb)。
荷有 2-3mm 腹腔肿瘤异种移植物的无胸腺裸鼠通过腹腔注射(212)Pb 标记的 35A7(抗 CEA)、曲妥珠单抗(抗 HER2)或 PX(非特异性)mAb,类似活性(370、740 和 1480 kBq;37 MBq/mg),或用相同量的未标记 mAb 或 NaCl。通过生物发光监测肿瘤体积,并报告存活情况。评估血液学毒性和体重。使用 MIRD 公式建立(212)Pb 标记 mAb 的生物分布和吸收剂量-效应关系。
接受(212)Pb 标记 mAb 最高活性治疗的小鼠出现白细胞和血小板计数的短暂血液学毒性。用 1.48 MBq(212)Pb-35A7(非内化 mAb)注射的小鼠的中位生存时间(MS)明显高于用相同活性的(212)Pb-PX mAb 或用 NaCl 治疗的动物(MS=94 天)。当用 1.48 MBq(212)Pb-曲妥珠单抗治疗的小鼠在 130 天后停止随访时,MS 甚至未达到。这一结果出乎意料,因为当使用 MIRD 公式计算时,来自注射 1.48 MBq 的最终吸收剂量对于(212)Pb-35A7(35.5 Gy)来说高于(212)Pb-曲妥珠单抗(27.6 Gy)。这些结果还强调了当使用 MIRD 公式计算平均吸收剂量时,吸收剂量-效应关系缺乏,并且需要进行小规模剂量学。
这些数据表明,与使用非内化抗 CEA(212)Pb 标记 mAb 相比,使用内化抗 HER2 可能是治疗小体积异种移植肿瘤的优势。它们支持在腹膜癌患者细胞减灭术后进行(212)Pb-mAb RIT 的临床研究,作为辅助治疗。