Duncan Jeffrey, Xu Wu, Narus Scott P, Clyde Stephen, Nangle Barry, Thornton Sid, Facelli Julio
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA ; Utah Department of Health, Salt Lake City, UT USA.
Online J Public Health Inform. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):210. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4669. Print 2013.
The sharing of personally identifiable information across organizational boundaries to facilitate patient identification in Utah presents significant policy challenges. Our objective was to create a focus area maturity model to describe and evaluate our progress in developing a policy framework to support a statewide master person index (sMPI) for healthcare and public health operations and research in Utah.
We used various artifacts, including minutes from policy guidance committee meetings over a span of 18 months, a report from Utah's Digital Health Services Commission, and a draft technical requirements document to retrospectively analyze our work and create a focus area maturity model describing the domain of policy needed to support the sMPI. We then used our model to assess our progress and future goals.
The focus area maturity model provides an orderly path that can guide the complex process of developing a functional statewide master person index among diverse, autonomous partners. While this paper focuses on our experience in Utah, we believe that the arguments for using a focus area maturity model to guide the development of state or regional MPIs is of general interest.
在犹他州,跨组织边界共享个人身份信息以促进患者身份识别面临重大政策挑战。我们的目标是创建一个重点领域成熟度模型,以描述和评估我们在制定政策框架方面的进展,该政策框架旨在支持犹他州医疗保健和公共卫生运营及研究的全州主人员索引(sMPI)。
我们使用了各种文档,包括18个月期间政策指导委员会会议记录、犹他州数字健康服务委员会的一份报告以及一份技术要求文件草案,以回顾性分析我们的工作,并创建一个重点领域成熟度模型,描述支持sMPI所需的政策领域。然后,我们使用该模型评估我们的进展和未来目标。
重点领域成熟度模型提供了一条有序的路径,可以指导在不同的自主合作伙伴之间开发功能性全州主人员索引的复杂过程。虽然本文重点介绍了我们在犹他州的经验,但我们认为,使用重点领域成熟度模型来指导州或地区主人员索引的开发具有普遍意义。