• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可视化中心静脉导管相关血流感染（CLABSI）结果数据以供医疗消费者和从业者进行决策——一项评估研究。

Visualizing Central Line -Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI) Outcome Data for Decision Making by Health Care Consumers and Practitioners-An Evaluation Study.

作者信息

Rajwan Yair G, Barclay Pamela W, Lee Theressa, Sun I-Fong, Passaretti Catherine, Lehmann Harold

机构信息

Visual Science Informatics, Analytics Visualization, Burke, VA.

出版信息

Online J Public Health Inform. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):218. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4364. Print 2013.

DOI:10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4364
PMID:23923102
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3733762/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate information visualization of publicly-reported central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) outcome data for decision making by diverse target audiences - health care consumers and practitioners. We describe the challenges in publicly reporting of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) data and the interpretation of an evaluation metric. Several options for visualization of CLABSI data were designed and evaluated employing exploratory working group, two confirmatory focus groups' observations, and experts' committee validation of the final designs. Survey-data collection and evaluation criteria results, collected from the two focus groups, are presented and are used to develop the final recommendations for how to visualize publicly-reported CLABSI data from Maryland acute care hospitals. Both health care consumer and practitioner's perspectives are highlighted and categorized based on the visualizations' dimensions framework. Finally, a recommended format for visualizing CLABSI outcome data based on the evaluation study is summarized.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估公开报告的中心静脉导管相关血流感染（CLABSI）结果数据的信息可视化，以供不同目标受众——医疗保健消费者和从业者进行决策。我们描述了医疗保健相关感染（HAIs）数据公开报告中的挑战以及一种评估指标的解读。设计并评估了几种CLABSI数据可视化的选项，采用了探索性工作组、两个验证性焦点小组的观察结果以及专家委员会对最终设计的验证。展示了从两个焦点小组收集的调查数据及评估标准结果，并用于制定关于如何可视化马里兰州急性护理医院公开报告的CLABSI数据的最终建议。基于可视化维度框架，突出并分类了医疗保健消费者和从业者的观点。最后，总结了基于评估研究的CLABSI结果数据可视化的推荐格式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/792b342676b2/ojphi-05-e218-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/7b1aef934f2c/ojphi-05-e218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/11e8615591b2/ojphi-05-e218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/8644b39b842f/ojphi-05-e218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/8b6a69eb9583/ojphi-05-e218-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f193d84bbe80/ojphi-05-e218-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/e7deccdd747e/ojphi-05-e218-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/c0a441f04f93/ojphi-05-e218-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f68ad8ee3367/ojphi-05-e218-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/89158b401f29/ojphi-05-e218-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/6517ff4832b1/ojphi-05-e218-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/3f84f37c3550/ojphi-05-e218-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/b3c6fab0914b/ojphi-05-e218-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f6b8ac4b8526/ojphi-05-e218-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f3545236500a/ojphi-05-e218-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/cc6b14103827/ojphi-05-e218-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/8e8c8e6b313b/ojphi-05-e218-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/548bb93907f1/ojphi-05-e218-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/2a5da1f44d2a/ojphi-05-e218-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/2826ba065ec7/ojphi-05-e218-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/792b342676b2/ojphi-05-e218-g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/7b1aef934f2c/ojphi-05-e218-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/11e8615591b2/ojphi-05-e218-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/8644b39b842f/ojphi-05-e218-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/8b6a69eb9583/ojphi-05-e218-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f193d84bbe80/ojphi-05-e218-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/e7deccdd747e/ojphi-05-e218-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/c0a441f04f93/ojphi-05-e218-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f68ad8ee3367/ojphi-05-e218-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/89158b401f29/ojphi-05-e218-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/6517ff4832b1/ojphi-05-e218-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/3f84f37c3550/ojphi-05-e218-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/b3c6fab0914b/ojphi-05-e218-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f6b8ac4b8526/ojphi-05-e218-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/f3545236500a/ojphi-05-e218-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/cc6b14103827/ojphi-05-e218-g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/8e8c8e6b313b/ojphi-05-e218-g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/548bb93907f1/ojphi-05-e218-g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/2a5da1f44d2a/ojphi-05-e218-g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/2826ba065ec7/ojphi-05-e218-g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7233/3733762/792b342676b2/ojphi-05-e218-g020.jpg

相似文献

1
Visualizing Central Line -Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI) Outcome Data for Decision Making by Health Care Consumers and Practitioners-An Evaluation Study.可视化中心静脉导管相关血流感染（CLABSI）结果数据以供医疗消费者和从业者进行决策——一项评估研究。
Online J Public Health Inform. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):218. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i2.4364. Print 2013.
2
Vital signs: central line-associated blood stream infections--United States, 2001, 2008, and 2009.生命体征：中心静脉导管相关血流感染——美国，2001 年、2008 年和 2009 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Mar 4;60(8):243-8.
3
Nurse-driven quality improvement interventions to reduce hospital-acquired infection in the NICU.由护士主导的降低新生儿重症监护病房医院获得性感染的质量改进干预措施。
Adv Neonatal Care. 2013 Jun;13(3):154-63; quiz 164-5. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318285fe70.
4
Guidance on public reporting of healthcare-associated infections: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.医疗保健相关感染公共报告指南：医疗保健感染控制实践咨询委员会的建议
Am J Infect Control. 2005 May;33(4):217-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.04.001.
5
Lessons learned from a hospital-wide review of blood stream infections for paediatric central line-associated blood stream infection prevention.从全院范围内对血流感染进行回顾以预防儿科中心静脉导管相关血流感染中吸取的经验教训。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Jun;55(6):690-694. doi: 10.1111/jpc.14276. Epub 2018 Oct 13.
6
Device-associated nosocomial infection in general hospitals, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013-2016.2013-2016 年沙特阿拉伯王国综合医院器械相关的医院感染。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018 Mar;7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S35-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
7
Do Experts Understand Performance Measures? A Mixed-Methods Study of Infection Preventionists.专家理解绩效衡量指标吗？感染防控专家的混合方法研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;39(1):71-76. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.243. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
8
Quantitative Results of a National Intervention to Prevent Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection: A Pre-Post Observational Study.全国性预防中心静脉导管相关性血流感染干预措施的定量结果：一项前后观察性研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;171(7_Suppl):S23-S29. doi: 10.7326/M18-3533.
9
Interventions to improve professional adherence to guidelines for prevention of device-related infections.旨在提高专业人员对预防器械相关感染指南依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD006559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006559.pub2.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Obstetric anaesthesia practice: Dashboard as a dynamic audit tool.产科麻醉实践：作为动态审计工具的仪表盘
Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Nov;62(11):838-843. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_346_18.
2
A comprehension scale for central-line associated bloodstream infection: Results of a preliminary survey and factor analysis.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的理解量表：初步调查和因素分析的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203431. eCollection 2018.
3
Do Experts Understand Performance Measures? A Mixed-Methods Study of Infection Preventionists.

本文引用的文献

1
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009.国家医疗安全网络（NHSN）报告：2006年至2008年数据摘要，2009年12月发布。
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Dec;37(10):783-805. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.001.
2
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.医疗保健消费者如何处理和评估比较性医疗保健信息？一项使用认知访谈的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 20;9:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-423.
3
Assessing consumer health vocabulary familiarity: an exploratory study.
专家理解绩效衡量指标吗？感染防控专家的混合方法研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;39(1):71-76. doi: 10.1017/ice.2017.243. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
4
Do Clinicians Understand Quality Metric Data? An Evaluation in a Twitter-Derived Sample.临床医生理解质量指标数据吗？对来自推特样本的一项评估。
J Hosp Med. 2017 Jan;12(1):18-22. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2680.
5
Lack of Patient Understanding of Hospital-Acquired Infection Data Published on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Compare Website.患者对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院比较网站上公布的医院获得性感染数据缺乏了解。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;37(2):182-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.260. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
What's Past is Prologue: A Scoping Review of Recent Public Health and Global Health Informatics Literature.过往即序幕：近期公共卫生与全球卫生信息学文献的范围综述
Online J Public Health Inform. 2015 Jul 1;7(2):e216. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v7i2.5931. eCollection 2015.
7
Improving central line infection rates in the neonatal intensive care unit: Effect of hospital location, site of insertion, and implementation of catheter-associated bloodstream infection protocols.提高新生儿重症监护病房的中心静脉导管感染率：医院位置、置管部位及导管相关血流感染预防措施实施情况的影响
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 May;50(5):860-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
8
A review of analytics and clinical informatics in health care.医疗保健领域的分析与临床信息学综述。
J Med Syst. 2014 Apr;38(4):45. doi: 10.1007/s10916-014-0045-x. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
评估消费者对健康词汇的熟悉程度：一项探索性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Mar 14;9(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e5.
4
Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers.向消费者提供高质量信息时，少即是多。
Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):169-90. doi: 10.1177/10775587070640020301.
5
How will we know patients are safer? An organization-wide approach to measuring and improving safety.我们如何知道患者更安全了？一种全组织范围内衡量和改善安全的方法。
Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul;34(7):1988-95. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000226412.12612.B6.
6
Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.消除重症监护病房中与导管相关的血流感染。
Crit Care Med. 2004 Oct;32(10):2014-20. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000142399.70913.2f.
7
Controlled vocabularies for consumer health.消费者健康领域的受控词汇表。
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Aug-Oct;36(4-5):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.09.015.
8
Supporting informed consumer health care decisions: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice.支持明智的消费者医疗保健决策：有助于在选择中使用信息的数据呈现方法。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2003;24:413-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.24.100901.141005. Epub 2001 Nov 6.
9
Strategies for reporting health plan performance information to consumers: evidence from controlled studies.向消费者报告健康计划绩效信息的策略：来自对照研究的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Apr;37(2):291-313. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.024.
10
Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.频率还是概率？对医疗保健中使用的风险沟通形式的定性研究。
Med Decis Making. 2001 Nov-Dec;21(6):459-67. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0102100604.