• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

反复吞食异物:伦理考量

Repetitive foreign body ingestion: ethical considerations.

作者信息

Lytle Sarah, Stagno Susan J, Daly Barb

机构信息

University Hospitals Case Medical Center Department of Psychiatry in Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):91-7.

PMID:23923808
Abstract

The treatment of persons who frequently present to the healthcare system following repetitive foreign body ingestion has been addressed in the psychiatric literature. However, there has been little exploration of the ethical considerations regarding the treatment of these patients. The complexity of their medical and psychiatric presentation raises fundamental ethical questions regarding the duty to treat, patient autonomy, justice, and futility. Careful ethical analysis is particularly important in this context, since the frustration that medical professionals may feel in response may lead to false assumptions that can negatively impact patient care. A careful exploration of these questions can increase awareness and understanding, which in turn can lead to improved treatment of patients who repetitively ingest foreign bodies. Care for patients who inflict self-harm, particularly by repetitive foreign body ingestion, is not futile. The patients have a right to treatment and are entitled to resources. Efforts should be made to provide a more comprehensive treatment approach to these patients.

摘要

精神病学文献中已探讨了对反复吞食异物后频繁前往医疗系统就诊者的治疗。然而,对于这些患者治疗中的伦理考量却鲜有探讨。他们医学和精神状况表现的复杂性引发了关于治疗义务、患者自主权、公平性和治疗无用性等基本伦理问题。在这种情况下,细致的伦理分析尤为重要,因为医疗专业人员可能产生的挫败感可能导致错误的假设,进而对患者护理产生负面影响。对这些问题进行仔细探究能够提高认识和理解,从而改善对反复吞食异物患者的治疗。对实施自我伤害的患者,尤其是通过反复吞食异物进行自我伤害的患者的护理并非徒劳。这些患者有权接受治疗并获得资源。应努力为这些患者提供更全面的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Repetitive foreign body ingestion: ethical considerations.反复吞食异物:伦理考量
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):91-7.
2
Why careproviders may conclude that treating a patient is futile.为何医疗服务提供者可能会认定治疗某患者是徒劳的。
J Clin Ethics. 2013 Summer;24(2):83-90.
3
Tackling medical futility in Texas.应对德克萨斯州的医疗无效问题。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 5;357(1):1-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078109.
4
Bioethical principles and care-based ethics in medical futility.医疗无效中的生物伦理原则与基于关怀的伦理
Cancer Pract. 1996 Jan-Feb;4(1):41-6.
5
Accepting the consequences of a treatment-refusal decision.接受拒绝治疗决定的后果。
Bioeth Bull. 1995 Summer-Fall;4(2):13-7.
6
Experts' attitudes towards medical futility: an empirical survey from Japan.专家对医疗无效性的态度:来自日本的实证调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2006 Jun 10;7:E8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-8.
7
Is a determination of medical futility ethical?判定医疗无效是否合乎伦理?
Prof Case Manag. 2012 May-Jun;17(3):103-6. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e31824d6720.
8
The concept of futility. Patients do not have a right to demand medically useless treatment. Counterpoint.无效治疗的概念。患者无权要求进行医学上无用的治疗。相反观点。
Health Prog. 1993 Dec;74(10):28-32.
9
Futility, autonomy, and informed consent.
Health Prog. 1994 Mar;75(2):40-6, 72.
10
The futility of futility?: on life, death, and reasoned public policy.徒劳之徒劳?:关于生命、死亡与合理的公共政策
MD Law Rev. 1998;57(2):505-57.