Suppr超能文献

肱骨骨干骨折的治疗——桥接钢板微创内固定与功能支具保守治疗的随机对照试验研究方案。

Treatment of the humeral shaft fractures--minimally invasive osteosynthesis with bridge plate versus conservative treatment with functional brace: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Trials. 2013 Aug 7;14:246. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-246.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Humeral shaft fractures account for 1 to 3% of all fractures in adults and for 20% of all humeral fractures. Non-operative treatment is still the standard treatment of isolated humeral shaft fractures, although this method can present unsatisfactory results. Surgical treatment is reserved for specific conditions. Modern concepts of internal fixation of long bone shaft fractures advocate relative stabilisation techniques with no harm to fracture zone. Recently described, minimally invasive bridge plate osteosynthesis has been shown to be a secure technique with good results for treating humeral shaft fractures. There is no good quality evidence advocating which method is more effective. This randomised controlled trial will be performed to investigate the effectiveness of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures with bridge plating in comparison with conservative treatment with functional brace.

METHODS/DESIGN: This randomised clinical trial aims to include 110 patients with humeral shaft fractures who will be allocated after randomisation to one of the two groups: bridge plate or functional brace. Surgical treatment will be performed according to technique described by Livani and Belangero using a narrow DCP plate. Non-operative management will consist of a functional brace for 6 weeks or until fracture consolidation. All patients will be included in the same rehabilitation program and will be followed up for 1 year after intervention. The primary outcome will be the DASH score after 6 months of intervention. As secondary outcomes, we will assess SF-36 questionnaire, treatment complications, Constant score, pain (Visual Analogue Scale) and radiographs.

DISCUSSION

According to current evidence shown in a recent systematic review, this study is one of the first randomised controlled trials designed to compare two methods to treat humeral shaft fractures (functional brace and bridge plate surgery).

摘要

背景

肱骨干骨折占成人所有骨折的 1%至 3%,占所有肱骨干骨折的 20%。尽管非手术治疗仍是单纯肱骨干骨折的标准治疗方法,但这种方法可能会导致不理想的结果。手术治疗仅适用于特定情况。现代长骨干骨折内固定的概念提倡采用对骨折区域无损伤的相对稳定技术。最近描述的微创桥接钢板接骨术已被证明是一种安全的技术,对治疗肱骨干骨折有良好的效果。目前尚无高质量的证据表明哪种方法更有效。本随机对照试验旨在研究桥接钢板手术治疗与保守治疗(功能支具)相比治疗肱骨干骨折的有效性。

方法/设计:这项随机临床试验旨在纳入 110 例肱骨干骨折患者,他们将在随机分组后分配到桥接钢板或功能支具两组中的一组。手术治疗将根据 Livani 和 Belangero 描述的技术进行,使用窄型 DCP 钢板。非手术治疗包括功能支具治疗 6 周或直至骨折愈合。所有患者将纳入相同的康复计划,并在干预后 1 年进行随访。主要结局指标为干预后 6 个月的 DASH 评分。作为次要结局指标,我们将评估 SF-36 问卷、治疗并发症、Constant 评分、疼痛(视觉模拟评分)和 X 线片。

讨论

根据最近系统评价显示的现有证据,本研究是设计比较两种方法治疗肱骨干骨折(功能支具和桥接钢板手术)的首批随机对照试验之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/481d/3750574/8daac3a07461/1745-6215-14-246-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验