Suppr超能文献

桥接钢板微创接骨术与功能性支具治疗肱骨干骨折的随机对照试验

Minimally Invasive Osteosynthesis with a Bridge Plate Versus a Functional Brace for Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Matsunaga Fabio Teruo, Tamaoki Marcel Jun Sugawara, Matsumoto Marcelo Hide, Netto Nicola Archetti, Faloppa Flavio, Belloti Joao Carlos

机构信息

1Division of Hand and Upper Limb Surgery, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo-Escola Paulista de Medicina (Unifesp-EPM), São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Apr 5;99(7):583-592. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00628.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nonoperative treatment has historically been considered the standard for fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Minimally invasive bridge-plate osteosynthesis for isolated humeral shaft fractures has been proven to be a safe technique, with good and reproducible results. This study was designed to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who had been treated with bridge plate osteosynthesis and those who had been managed nonoperatively with a functional brace.

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial was designed and included 110 patients allocated to 1 of 2 groups: surgery with a bridge plate or nonoperative treatment with a functional brace. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 6 months. The score on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) life-quality questionnaire, complications of treatment, Constant-Murley score for the shoulder, pain level, and radiographic results were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at 2 weeks; 1, 2, and 6 months; and 1 year after the interventions.

RESULTS

The mean DASH score of the bridge plate group was statistically superior to that of the functional brace group (mean scores, 10.9 and 16.9, respectively; p = 0.046) only at 6 months. The bridge plate group also had a significantly more favorable nonunion rate (0% versus 15%) and less mean residual angular displacement seen on the anteroposterior radiograph (2.0° versus 10.5°) (both p < 0.05). No difference between the groups was detected with regard to the SF-36 score, pain level, Constant-Murley score, or angular displacement seen on the lateral radiograph.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial demonstrates that, compared with functional bracing, surgical treatment with a bridge plate has a statistically significant advantage, of uncertain clinical benefit, with respect to self-reported outcome (DASH score) at 6 months, nonunion rate, and residual deformity in the coronal plane as seen on radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

从历史上看,非手术治疗一直被视为肱骨干骨折的标准治疗方法。对于孤立性肱骨干骨折,微创桥接钢板内固定术已被证明是一种安全的技术,具有良好且可重复的效果。本研究旨在比较接受桥接钢板内固定术治疗的患者与采用功能性支具进行非手术治疗的患者的临床和影像学结果。

方法

设计了一项前瞻性随机试验,纳入110例患者,分为2组:桥接钢板手术组或功能性支具非手术治疗组。主要结局指标是6个月时的上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分。次要结局指标包括简明健康状况调查量表(SF-36)生活质量问卷评分、治疗并发症、肩部Constant-Murley评分、疼痛程度和影像学结果。在干预后2周、1个月、2个月、6个月和1年对参与者进行评估。

结果

仅在6个月时,桥接钢板组的平均DASH评分在统计学上优于功能性支具组(平均评分分别为10.9和16.9;p = 0.046)。桥接钢板组的骨不连发生率也显著更低(0%对15%),前后位X线片上的平均残余角位移更小(2.0°对10.5°)(均p < 0.05)。两组在SF-36评分、疼痛程度、Constant-Murley评分或侧位X线片上的角位移方面未检测到差异。

结论

本试验表明,与功能性支具相比,桥接钢板手术治疗在6个月时的自我报告结局(DASH评分)、骨不连发生率和X线片上所见的冠状面残余畸形方面具有统计学显著优势,但临床益处尚不确定。

证据水平

治疗性I级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者须知。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验