Moore Z, Johansen E, van Etten M
School of Nursing, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
J Wound Care. 2013 Aug;22(8):423-4, 426-8, 430-1. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.8.423.
To provide a critical appraisal of nurses risk assessment and pressure ulcer (PU) preventive practices across Scandinavia, Iceland and Ireland.
An integrative research review following Cooper's five stages. Studies published in peer-reviewed journals, involving any study design, but specifically exploring PU risk assessment or preventative practices, in any care setting, were included.
Risk assessment practice was primarily investigated in the acute care setting and was found to be irregular, based on both numeric scales and clinical judgments. This irregular practice means that some vulnerable patients are not screened for pressure ulcer risk, conversely, when risk assessed, a care plan is not necessarily provided.A significant gap in nurse documentation, together with a lack of supporting evidence for repositioning and use of appropriate redistribution devices was also identified,indicating a lack of a standardised approach to pressure ulcer prevention.
Despite an abundance of literature exploring this subject, it is clear that current practice in pressure ulcer prevention is not embedded within best practice recommendations. Therefore, to address the potential patient safety implications, clinical practice could benefit from exploration and identification of practical methods for improving actual pressure ulcer preventive practice.
对斯堪的纳维亚半岛、冰岛和爱尔兰的护士风险评估及压疮预防措施进行批判性评估。
遵循库珀的五个阶段进行综合研究综述。纳入发表在同行评审期刊上的研究,研究设计不限,但需专门探讨任何护理环境下的压疮风险评估或预防措施。
风险评估实践主要在急性护理环境中进行调查,发现基于数字量表和临床判断的评估并不规范。这种不规范的做法意味着一些易患压疮的患者未接受压疮风险筛查,反之,在进行风险评估时,不一定会提供护理计划。还发现护士记录存在重大差距,同时缺乏关于重新定位和使用适当减压装置的支持证据,这表明在压疮预防方面缺乏标准化方法。
尽管有大量文献探讨该主题,但很明显,目前的压疮预防实践并未纳入最佳实践建议。因此,为解决对患者安全的潜在影响,临床实践可从探索和确定改进实际压疮预防实践的实用方法中受益。