• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Prescription of pressure injury preventative interventions following risk assessment: An exploratory, descriptive study.压疮预防干预措施的开具:一项探索性、描述性研究。
Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):985-992. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12965. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Relationship Between Prescription and Documentation of Pressure Injury Prevention Interventions and Their Implementation: An Exploratory, Descriptive Study.预防压力性损伤干预措施的处方与记录及其实施之间的关系:一项探索性、描述性研究。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Dec;17(6):465-475. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12473. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
Pressure injury risk assessment and prescription of preventative interventions using a structured tool versus clinical judgement: An interrater agreement study.压力性损伤风险评估和使用结构化工具与临床判断预防干预措施的处方:一项评估者间一致性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4523-4536. doi: 10.1111/jan.16142. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
4
The relationship between pressure ulcer risk assessment and preventative interventions: a systematic review.压力性溃疡风险评估与预防干预措施之间的关系:一项系统综述
J Wound Care. 2018 Dec 2;27(12):862-875. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.12.862.
5
Pressure injury prevention strategies in acute medical inpatients: an observational study.急性内科住院患者压力性损伤预防策略:一项观察性研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2-3):326-40. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1190657. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
Use of a risk-based intervention bundle to prescribe and implement interventions to prevent pressure injury: An observational study.使用基于风险的干预组合来开具和实施预防压疮的干预措施:一项观察性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5315-5328. doi: 10.1111/jan.16309. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
7
The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial.以患者为中心的护理组合干预对压疮发生率的影响(INTACT):一项整群随机试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
8
Evaluation of a multifactorial approach to reduce the prevalence of pressure injuries in regional Australian acute inpatient care settings.评估一种多因素方法在减少澳大利亚地区急性住院患者压力性损伤发生率中的应用。
Int Wound J. 2018 Feb;15(1):95-105. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12840. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
9
Braden Scale risk assessments and pressure ulcer prevention planning: what's the connection?Braden 量表风险评估与压疮预防计划:二者有何关联?
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;36(6):622-34. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3181bd812c.
10
Nursing practice in the prevention of pressure ulcers: an observational study of German Hospitals.德国医院预防压疮的护理实践:一项观察性研究
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jun;24(11-12):1513-24. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12723. Epub 2014 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of a risk-based intervention bundle to prescribe and implement interventions to prevent pressure injury: An observational study.使用基于风险的干预组合来开具和实施预防压疮的干预措施:一项观察性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Sep;81(9):5315-5328. doi: 10.1111/jan.16309. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
2
Reduction in the Incidence Density of Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Units after Advance Preventive Protocols.采用预先预防方案后重症监护病房压力性损伤发病率密度的降低
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 25;11(15):2116. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152116.
3
Prophylactic sacral protective dressings' effect on preventing pressure injury: A meta-analysis.预防性骶部保护敷料预防压力性损伤的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1463-1470. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13743. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Pressure Injury Surveillance and Prevention in Australia: Monash Partners Capacity Building Framework.澳大利亚的压力性损伤监测与预防:莫纳什伙伴能力建设框架
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;9:634669. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634669. eCollection 2021.
5
International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.国际危重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险级别共识:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1112-1127. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13461. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
6
Authors' response to comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".作者对关于“针对重症患者按风险水平进行压力性损伤预防干预的国际共识:一项改良德尔菲研究”的评论的回应
Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):738-741. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13519. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to evidence-based pressure injury prevention guidelines in routine clinical practice: a longitudinal study.在常规临床实践中遵循基于证据的压疮预防指南:一项纵向研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1290-1298. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12798. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
2
The cost-effectiveness of a patient centred pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: Findings from the INTACT cluster randomised trial.以患者为中心的压疮预防护理包的成本效益:来自 INTACT 集群随机试验的结果。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Oct;75:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
3
Pain associated with pressure injury: A qualitative study of community-based, home-dwelling individuals.压力性损伤相关疼痛:一项基于社区、居家个体的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Dec;73(12):3061-3069. doi: 10.1111/jan.13370. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
The effect of a patient centred care bundle intervention on pressure ulcer incidence (INTACT): A cluster randomised trial.以患者为中心的护理组合干预对压疮发生率的影响(INTACT):一项整群随机试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Dec;64:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.015. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
5
Pressure injury prevention strategies in acute medical inpatients: an observational study.急性内科住院患者压力性损伤预防策略:一项观察性研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2-3):326-40. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1190657. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Using Prophylactic Dressings to Minimize Sacral Pressure Injuries in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients.一项使用预防性敷料将高危住院患者骶骨压力性损伤降至最低的试点随机对照试验。
Clin Nurs Res. 2017 Aug;26(4):484-503. doi: 10.1177/1054773816629689. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
7
Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices: a cross-sectional comparative survey in Norway and Ireland.压疮患病率及预防措施:挪威和爱尔兰的一项横断面比较调查
J Wound Care. 2015 Aug;24(8):333-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.8.333.
8
Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.重症监护中的压力性损伤风险评估:COMHON(意识水平、活动能力、血流动力学、氧合、营养)指数与三种量表的评分者间信度比较。
J Adv Nurs. 2016 Mar;72(3):680-92. doi: 10.1111/jan.12825. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
9
Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention.预防压疮的支撑面
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD001735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5.
10
A Survey of Australian Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Injury/Pressure Ulcer Management.澳大利亚护士压力性损伤/压疮管理知识调查
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015 Sep-Oct;42(5):450-60. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000141.

压疮预防干预措施的开具:一项探索性、描述性研究。

Prescription of pressure injury preventative interventions following risk assessment: An exploratory, descriptive study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Banyo, Queensland, Australia.

Nursing Research and Practice Development Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):985-992. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12965. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.12965
PMID:30070026
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7950082/
Abstract

This exploratory, descriptive study aimed to identify and describe the pressure injury preventative interventions prescribed by nurses following the assessment of a patient's pressure injury risk and to compare the prescribed interventions relative to the assessed risk level. A total of 200 inpatients in a tertiary Australian hospital were included. Patients' charts were audited within 24 hours of admission. Data collected included patient characteristics, pressure injury risk assessment score and level, and preventative interventions prescribed. Most patients were assessed as not being at risk, with the largest group of at-risk patients assessed as being at high risk. Some not-at-risk patients were prescribed interventions intended for those at risk, while prescription rates of preventative interventions recommended for those at any level of risk were variable (6%-64%). Significant associations were found between assessed pressure injury risk and preventative intervention prescription. Preventative intervention prescription was inadequate, potentially exposing some patients to pressure injury. However, the association between intervention prescription and risk level suggests that nurses are prescribing interventions relative to risk. A more structured approach to intervention prescription according to risk level, such as a care bundle, may help to improve nurses' preventative intervention prescription and ensure that all at-risk patients receive appropriate preventative interventions.

摘要

本探索性、描述性研究旨在确定和描述护士在评估患者压疮风险后开出的压疮预防干预措施,并根据评估的风险水平比较开出的干预措施。共纳入澳大利亚一家三级医院的 200 名住院患者。在入院后 24 小时内对患者的病历进行了审核。收集的数据包括患者特征、压疮风险评估评分和级别以及开出的预防干预措施。大多数患者被评估为没有风险,最大的风险患者群体被评估为高风险。一些没有风险的患者被开处了针对有风险患者的干预措施,而对于任何风险级别的患者推荐的预防干预措施的处方率各不相同(6%-64%)。评估的压疮风险与预防干预处方之间存在显著关联。预防干预处方不足,可能使一些患者面临压疮风险。然而,干预处方与风险水平之间的关联表明,护士根据风险开出干预措施。根据风险水平制定更结构化的干预处方方法,如护理包,可能有助于提高护士预防干预的处方率,并确保所有有风险的患者都接受适当的预防干预措施。