Suppr超能文献

急性轻度创伤性脑损伤的干预措施:系统评价。

Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.

机构信息

Département de Pédiatrie, CHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 7;2:63. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-63.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients who sustain mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms at 1 week and 1 month after injury. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of interventions initiated in acute settings for patients who experience mTBI.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all randomized clinical trials evaluating any intervention initiated in an acute setting for patients experiencing acute mTBI. All possible outcomes were included. The primary sources of identification were MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, from 1980 to August 2012. Hand searching of proceedings from five meetings related to mTBI was also performed. Study selection was conducted by two co-authors, and data abstraction was completed by a research assistant specialized in conducting systematic reviews. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of Bias assessment tool.

RESULTS

From a potential 15,156 studies, 1,268 abstracts were evaluated and 120 articles were read completely. Of these, 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. One study evaluated a pharmacological intervention, two evaluated activity restriction, one evaluated head computed tomography scan versus admission, four evaluated information interventions, and seven evaluated different follow-up interventions. Use of different outcome measures limited the possibilities for analysis. However, a meta-analysis of three studies evaluating various follow-up strategies versus routine follow-up or no follow-up failed to show any effect on three outcomes at 6 to 12 months post-trauma. In addition, a meta-analysis of two studies found no effect of an information intervention on headache at 3 months post-injury.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of well-designed clinical studies for patients who sustain mTBI. The large variability in outcomes measured in studies limits comparison between them.

摘要

背景

大多数遭受轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)的患者在受伤后 1 周和 1 个月仍存在持续症状。本系统评价调查了在急性环境中为经历 mTBI 的患者启动的干预措施的有效性。

方法

我们对所有评估在急性环境中为经历急性 mTBI 的患者启动的任何干预措施的随机临床试验进行了系统评价。纳入了所有可能的结局。最初的识别来源是 MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,时间范围为 1980 年至 2012 年 8 月。还对手动搜索了五个与 mTBI 相关的会议的会议记录。两位合著者进行了研究选择,一位专门从事系统评价的研究助理完成了数据提取。使用 Cochrane 的偏倚风险评估工具评估研究质量。

结果

从潜在的 15156 项研究中,评估了 1268 篇摘要,并完整阅读了 120 篇文章。其中,15 项研究符合纳入/排除标准。一项研究评估了药物干预,两项研究评估了活动限制,一项研究评估了头部计算机断层扫描与入院的关系,四项研究评估了信息干预,七项研究评估了不同的随访干预。由于使用了不同的结局测量方法,限制了分析的可能性。然而,对三项评估各种随访策略与常规随访或无随访的研究进行的荟萃分析未能显示出对创伤后 6 至 12 个月三个结局的任何影响。此外,对两项研究的荟萃分析发现,信息干预对受伤后 3 个月的头痛无影响。

结论

对经历 mTBI 的患者进行的设计良好的临床研究很少。研究中测量的结局的巨大变异性限制了它们之间的比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d9e/3750385/cf5eb5df5752/2046-4053-2-63-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验