• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手动牙刷的功效与偏好:一项随机、单盲、对照试验

Efficacy and preference of manual toothbrushes: a randomised, single blind, controlled trial.

作者信息

Nieri Michele, Giani Monica, Pagliaro Umberto, Picciullo Alessia, Franceschi Debora, Rotundo Roberto

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Summer;6(2):181-8.

PMID:23926589
Abstract

PURPOSE

Toothbrushes are manufactured in different designs but it is unclear whether these differences may lead to improvement in the removal of bacterial plaque or make the toothbrushes more appealing to users. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of 11 toothbrushes in terms of plaque removal and their acceptance by patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven toothbrushes were randomly assigned to one of the 12 sectors of the mouth of 48 patients. Each patient underwent one plaque recording before and after toothbrushing. Eleven sectors of the mouth were brushed by 11 different toothbrushes, while one sector was used as a control (no toothbrushing). Two questionnaires were also administered to investigate the aesthetic and comfort preference by each participant.

RESULTS

All 11 toothbrushes resulted in effective plaque reduction with respect to the control sector (P < 0.0001). No significant differences were found between them. Colgate Massager showed the highest score for aesthetic preference by the patients when compared with Butler 311 and Gum Super Tip 463 (P = 0.0148). Oral-B Indicator 35 exhibited the highest score in terms of comfort felt by the patients compared to Colgate Omni and Gum Technique 493 (P = 0.0095).

CONCLUSIONS

All of the tested toothbrushes, even though different with respect to shape and scope of function, demonstrated efficacious plaque removal.

摘要

目的

牙刷有不同的设计,但尚不清楚这些差异是否能改善牙菌斑的清除效果,或者使牙刷对使用者更具吸引力。本研究的目的是比较11种牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面的效果以及患者对它们的接受程度。

材料与方法

将11种牙刷随机分配给48名患者口腔的12个区域之一。每位患者在刷牙前后各进行一次牙菌斑记录。用11种不同的牙刷分别刷洗口腔的11个区域,而其中一个区域作为对照(不刷牙)。还发放了两份问卷来调查每位参与者对美观和舒适度的偏好。

结果

与对照区域相比,所有11种牙刷都能有效减少牙菌斑(P < 0.0001)。它们之间未发现显著差异。与巴特勒311和益齿超尖463相比,高露洁按摩牙刷在患者的美观偏好方面得分最高(P = 0.0148)。与高露洁全能牙刷和益齿技术493相比,欧乐B显示型35在患者感觉的舒适度方面得分最高(P = 0.0095)。

结论

所有测试的牙刷,尽管在形状和功能范围方面有所不同,但都显示出有效的牙菌斑清除效果。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and preference of manual toothbrushes: a randomised, single blind, controlled trial.手动牙刷的功效与偏好:一项随机、单盲、对照试验
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2013 Summer;6(2):181-8.
2
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
3
Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.一种新型实验性电池驱动牙刷相对于两种先进设计手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):191-7.
4
Dental plaque removal efficacy of three toothbrushes with different designs: A comparative analysis.三种不同设计牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果:一项对比分析。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2006;4(2):105-11.
5
The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.六种电动牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面的相对有效性。
J Clin Dent. 2002;13(5):198-202.
6
Comparative efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to two commercially available power toothbrushes on established plaque and gingivitis.一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与两款市售电动牙刷在已形成的牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的比较疗效。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A5-10.
7
Is a new sonic toothbrush more effective in plaque removal than a manual toothbrush?新型声波牙刷在去除牙菌斑方面是否比手动牙刷更有效?
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Mar;16(1):13-8.
8
A Thirty-Day Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the Rowenta, Braun and Sonicare Powered Toothbrushes and a Manual Toothbrush.Rowenta、博朗和飞利浦声波震动牙刷与手动牙刷的30天安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(4):120-3.
9
Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.一款具有微脉冲刷毛和先进分体刷头设计的新型手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除功效。
J Clin Dent. 2007;18(2):49-54.
10
Plaque removal with a novel manual toothbrush (X-Active) and the Braun Oral-B 3D Plaque Remover.使用新型手动牙刷(X-Active)和博朗欧乐-B 3D牙菌斑清除器清除牙菌斑。
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Feb;30(2):138-44. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00114.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of an automatic electric toothbrush with nylon bristles in dental plaque removal: a cross-over randomized controlled trial.尼龙刷毛自动电动牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面的功效:一项交叉随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 14;28(4):211. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05601-w.
2
Dental Biofilm Removal and Bacterial Contamination of a New Doubled-Side Thermoplastic Polyurethane-Based Toothbrush: A Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.新型双面热塑性聚氨酯牙刷的牙菌斑清除及细菌污染情况:一项针对健康志愿者的交叉研究
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Sep 22;11(10):1296. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11101296.
3
Gingival recessions caused by Herpes Simplex Virus in a patient with COVID-19 infection.
一名新冠肺炎感染患者中由单纯疱疹病毒引起的牙龈退缩。
Clin Case Rep. 2022 Aug 3;10(8). doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6056. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Interdisciplinary orthodontic-periodontal treatment of unerupted permanent maxillary incisors following traumatic injury to deciduous teeth. Case report with long-term follow-up (11 years).乳牙外伤后未萌出的上颌恒切牙的正畸-牙周联合治疗。长期随访(11年)病例报告
Clin Case Rep. 2021 Apr 8;9(5):e04052. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.4052. eCollection 2021 May.
5
Efficacy of a U-Shaped Automatic Electric Toothbrush in Dental Plaque Removal: A Cross-Over Randomized Controlled Trial.U 型自动电动牙刷在清除牙菌斑方面的功效:一项交叉随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 28;17(13):4649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134649.