Xu X-Q, Zu Q-Q, Lu S-S, Cheng Q-G, Yu J, Sheng Y, Shi H-B, Liu S
From the Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):311-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3689. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability, and many studies have focused on the evolution of FLAIR imaging in the acute and chronic time window. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential efficacy of FLAIR-related techniques in identifying the onset time of cerebral ischemia in a canine embolic stroke model.
An embolic ischemic model was generated through the use of an autologous clot in 20 beagle dogs. Both FLAIR and DWI were performed at 3 hours, 4 hours, 5 hours, 6 hours, and 24 hours after embolization, respectively. Visual "DWI-FLAIR mismatch" was defined as hyperintense signal detected on DWI but not on FLAIR. The relative signal intensity of FLAIR-positive lesions and the degree of DWI-FLAIR mismatch was calculated as relative FLAIR = relative signal intensity of FLAIR positive lesions, mismatch degree = (100-VFLAIR/VDWI) × 100%.
The ischemic model was successfully established in all animals. FLAIR-positive lesions were seen in 3, 11, 16, 19, and 20 beagle dogs at 5 time points after embolization, respectively. There was significant correlation between the relative FLAIR, degree of DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and the onset time (relative FLAIR: r = +0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.60; mismatch degree: r = -0.85; 95% CI, 0.89-0.78). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that the degree of DWI-FLAIR mismatch could identify the hyperacute ischemic lesions with a sensitivity range from 1.00-0.76; visual DWI-FLAIR mismatch sensitivity ranged from 0.85-0.39, whereas specificity was 0.83-0.95 versus 0.85-1.00.
The relative FLAIR and DWI-FLAIR mismatch values were useful in predicting the onset time in our canine embolic stroke model. The degree of DWI-FLAIR mismatch proposed in our study could be a good indicator with high sensitivity for identifying the hyperacute ischemic stroke.
中风是导致死亡和残疾的主要原因,许多研究聚焦于液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)成像在急性和慢性时间窗内的演变情况。本研究旨在评估FLAIR相关技术在犬类栓塞性中风模型中识别脑缺血发病时间的潜在效能。
通过使用自体血凝块在20只比格犬中建立栓塞性缺血模型。分别在栓塞后3小时、4小时、5小时、6小时和24小时进行FLAIR和弥散加权成像(DWI)检查。视觉上的“DWI-FLAIR不匹配”定义为在DWI上检测到高信号但在FLAIR上未检测到。计算FLAIR阳性病变的相对信号强度以及DWI-FLAIR不匹配程度,相对FLAIR = FLAIR阳性病变的相对信号强度,不匹配程度 = (100 - VFLAIR/VDWI) × 100%。
所有动物均成功建立缺血模型。栓塞后5个时间点分别在3只、11只、16只、19只和20只比格犬中观察到FLAIR阳性病变。相对FLAIR、DWI-FLAIR不匹配程度与发病时间之间存在显著相关性(相对FLAIR:r = +0.42;95%置信区间,0.20 - 0.60;不匹配程度:r = -0.85;95%置信区间,0.89 - 0.78)。受试者操作特征曲线显示,DWI-FLAIR不匹配程度识别超急性缺血性病变的敏感度范围为1.00 - 0.76;视觉上的DWI-FLAIR不匹配敏感度范围为0.85 - 0.39,而特异性分别为0.83 - 0.95和0.85 - 1.00。
相对FLAIR和DWI-FLAIR不匹配值在预测我们的犬类栓塞性中风模型的发病时间方面是有用的。我们研究中提出的DWI-FLAIR不匹配程度可能是识别超急性缺血性中风的具有高敏感度的良好指标。