Department of Microbiology, M.M.I.M.S.R., MM University, Mullana, Ambala 133207, India.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 Oct;77(2):150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
The study was designed to compare the efficacy of cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) and sodium chloride (NaCl) decontamination method with N-acetyl L-Cystine (NALC) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH) decontamination (the reference method) method for the recovery of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) from clinically suspected cases of pulmonary tuberculosis. To evaluate CPC-NaCl and NALC-NaOH decontamination methods, sputum specimens (n = 796) were studied (culturing on Löwenstein-Jensen medium), and the performances were compared. The CPC-NaCl decontamination method demonstrated a sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of 97.99%, 87.53%, 70.19%, and 99.32%, respectively, when compared to NALC-NaOH decontamination method. In summary, CPC-NaCl decontamination method effectively detected significantly higher number of MTB cases (n = 208) than NALC-NaOH decontamination method (n = 149) particularly in sputum with scanty bacilli and smear-negative cases, indicating the potential of CPC-NaCl decontamination method to preserve paucibacillary cases more efficient than NALC-NaOH decontamination method.
本研究旨在比较氯化十六烷基吡啶(CPC)和氯化钠(NaCl)去污方法与 N-乙酰-L-半胱氨酸(NALC)和氢氧化钠(NaOH)去污(参考方法)方法对临床疑似肺结核患者的结核分枝杆菌(MTB)回收的效果。为了评估 CPC-NaCl 和 NALC-NaOH 去污方法,研究了 796 份痰标本(培养在 Löwenstein-Jensen 培养基上),并比较了它们的性能。与 NALC-NaOH 去污方法相比,CPC-NaCl 去污方法的灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为 97.99%、87.53%、70.19%和 99.32%。总之,CPC-NaCl 去污方法有效地检测到了明显更多的 MTB 病例(n=208),而 NALC-NaOH 去污方法(n=149),特别是在菌量少和涂片阴性的痰中,表明 CPC-NaCl 去污方法比 NALC-NaOH 去污方法更有效地保存少菌病例的潜力。