Suppr超能文献

西欧晚期尼安德特人群体的区域行为:中更新世晚期两面工具变异性的比较评估。

Regional behaviour among late Neanderthal groups in Western Europe: a comparative assessment of late Middle Palaeolithic bifacial tool variability.

机构信息

Centre for the Archaeology of Human Origins (CAHO), University of Southampton, Avenue Campus, Southampton SO17 1BF, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Evol. 2013 Oct;65(4):341-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Aug 6.

Abstract

Population dynamics between and within Pleistocene groups are vital to understanding wider behavioural processes like social transmission and cultural variation. The late Middle Palaeolithic (MIS 5d-3, ca. 115,000-35,000 BP [years before present]) permits a novel, data-driven assessment of these concepts through a unique record: bifacial tools made by classic Neanderthals. Previously, studies of late Middle Palaeolithic bifacial tools were hampered by a convoluted plethora of competing terms, types and regional entities. This paper presents a large-scale intercomparison of this tool type, and bridges typo-technological and spatio-temporal data from across Western Europe (Britain, Belgium, the Netherlands, France and Germany). Results indicate a high level of variation among individual bifacial tools and assemblages. Each bifacial tool concept is correlated with various methods of production, resulting in large degrees of morphological variation. Despite such variation, a distinct three-fold, macro-regional pattern was identified: the Mousterian of Acheulean Tradition (MTA) in the southwest dominated by handaxes, the Keilmessergruppen (KMG) in the northeast typified by backed and leaf-shaped bifacial tools, and, finally a new unit, the Mousterian with Bifacial Tools (MBT), geographically situated between these two major entities, and characterised by a wider variety of bifacial tools. Differing local conditions, such as raw material or function, are not sufficient to explain this observed macro-regional tripartite. Instead, the MTA and KMG can be viewed as two distinct cultural traditions, where the production of a specific bifacial tool concept was passed on over generations. Conversely, the MBT is interpreted as a border zone where highly mobile groups of Neanderthals from both the east (KMG) and west (MTA) interacted. Principally, this study presents an archaeological contribution to behavioural concepts such as regionality, culture, social transmission and population dynamics. It illustrates the interpretive potential of large-scale lithic studies, and more specifically the presence of regionalised cultural behaviour amongst late Neanderthal groups in Western Europe.

摘要

古人类群体之间和群体内部的种群动态对于理解社会传播和文化演变等更广泛的行为过程至关重要。中更新世晚期(MIS 5d-3,约 115000-35000 年前)为通过独特的记录来评估这些概念提供了一种新颖的数据驱动方法:经典尼安德特人制作的双面工具。在此之前,由于复杂多样的竞争术语、类型和区域实体,对中更新世晚期双面工具的研究受到了阻碍。本文对这种工具类型进行了大规模的比较研究,并将来自西欧(英国、比利时、荷兰、法国和德国)的技术和时空数据进行了衔接。研究结果表明,个体双面工具和工具组合之间存在高度的变化。每个双面工具概念都与各种生产方法相关联,从而导致了很大程度的形态变化。尽管存在这种变化,但仍确定了一个明显的三部分、宏观区域模式:西南部以手斧为代表的阿舍利传统莫斯特石器工业(MTA)、东北部以有背和叶片形双面工具为特征的基梅里耶尔群组(KMG),最后是一个新的单元,位于这两个主要实体之间的双面工具莫斯特石器工业(MBT),其特点是具有更多种类的双面工具。不同的当地条件,如原材料或功能,不足以解释这种观察到的宏观区域三分法。相反,MTA 和 KMG 可以被视为两种不同的文化传统,其中特定的双面工具概念的制作是通过几代人传承下来的。相比之下,MBT 被解释为一个边境地区,来自东部(KMG)和西部(MTA)的高度流动的尼安德特人群体在这里相互作用。这项研究主要为区域、文化、社会传播和种群动态等行为概念提供了考古学贡献。它说明了大规模石器研究的解释潜力,特别是在西欧晚期尼安德特人群体中存在区域文化行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验