Carmignani Leonardo, Moncel Marie-Hélène, Fernandes Paul, Wilson Lucy
IDQP Phd candidate, IPHES, Institut Català de Paleoecologia Humana i Evolució Social, Tarragona, Spain.
Àrea de Prehistòria, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):e0178550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178550. eCollection 2017.
The study of the lithic assemblages of two French sites, the Bau de l'Aubesier and Payre, contributes new knowledge of the earliest Neanderthal techno-cultural variability. In this paper we present the results of a detailed technological analysis of Early Middle Palaeolithic lithic assemblages of MIS 8 and 7 age from the two sites, which are located on opposite sides of the Rhône Valley in the south-east of France. The MIS 9-7 period is considered in Europe to be a time of new behaviours, especially concerning lithic strategies. The shift from the Lower Palaeolithic to the Early Middle Palaeolithic is "classically" defined by an increase in the number of core technologies, including standardized ones, which are stabilized in the full Middle Palaeolithic (MIS 5-3), associated with the decline of the "Acheulean" biface. Applying a common technological approach to the analysis of the two assemblages highlights their technological variability with respect to reduction systems and end products. Differences between Payre and the Bau de l'Aubesier concerning raw material procurement and faunal exploitation only partially explain this multifaceted technological variability, which in our opinion also reflects the existence of distinct technological strategies within the same restricted geographic area, which are related to distinct traditions, site uses, and/or as yet unknown parameters.
对法国两个遗址——奥布西耶尔堡(Bau de l'Aubesier)和佩尔(Payre)的石器组合进行研究,为了解尼安德特人最早的技术文化变异性提供了新知识。在本文中,我们展示了对这两个位于法国东南部罗讷河谷两岸、年代为海洋同位素阶段(MIS)8和7期的旧石器时代中期早期石器组合进行详细技术分析的结果。在欧洲,MIS 9 - 7期被认为是出现新行为的时期,尤其是在石器制作策略方面。从旧石器时代早期到旧石器时代中期早期的转变,“经典地”表现为核心技术数量的增加,包括标准化技术,这些技术在整个旧石器时代中期(MIS 5 - 3)得以稳定,同时伴随着“阿舍利”双面器的衰落。对这两个组合采用共同的技术分析方法,凸显了它们在石器制作系统和最终产品方面的技术变异性。佩尔和奥布西耶尔堡在原材料获取和动物资源利用方面的差异,只能部分解释这种多方面的技术变异性,我们认为这种变异性还反映了在同一有限地理区域内存在不同的技术策略,这些策略与不同的传统、遗址用途和/或尚未知晓的因素有关。