Biomedical Engineering Interdepartmental Program, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
Integr Biol (Camb). 2013 Oct;5(10):1206-16. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40086g.
An understanding of parameters that modulate gene transfer in 3-D will assist in the formation of gene delivery systems and scaffolds, which can mediate efficient non-viral delivery for guiding in vivo tissue regeneration and therapy. We have previously demonstrated the cell area and length, integrin expression, and RhoGTPase mediated signalling to be pivotal parameters that guide gene transfer to mouse mesenchymal stem cells (mMSCs) cultured in 2-D and are modulated by ECM proteins. In this study, we were interested in determining if cationic polymer mediated gene transfer to cells seeded in 3-D would occur through different mechanisms as compared to those seeded in 2-D. In particular, we examined the endocytosis pathways used to internalize polyplexes, and the role of cytoskeletal dynamics and RhoGTPases in non-viral gene transfer for cells seeded in 2-D and 3-D. Inhibition of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis resulted in a more drastic decrease in overall transgene expression for cells seeded in 3-D than for those in 2-D. In addition, polyplex internalization was only significantly decreased in 3-D when clathrin-mediated endocytosis was inhibited, while caveolae-mediated endocytosis inhibition for cells seeded in 2-D resulted in the strongest polyplex internalization inhibition. Actin and microtubule polymerization affected 2-D and 3-D transfection differently. Microtubule depolymerization enhanced transgene expression in 2-D, but inhibited transgene expression in 3-D. Lastly, inhibition of RhoGTPases also affected 2-D and 3-D transfection differently. The inhibition of ROCK effectors resulted in a decrease of transgene expression and internalization for cells seeded in 3-D, but not in 2-D, and the inhibition of the effector PAK1 resulted in an increase of transgene expression for both 2-D and 3-D. Overall, our study suggests that the process of gene transfer occurs through different mechanisms for cells seeded in 2-D compared to those seeded in 3-D.
了解调节三维基因转移的参数将有助于形成基因传递系统和支架,这可以介导有效的非病毒传递,以指导体内组织再生和治疗。我们之前已经证明,细胞面积和长度、整合素表达和 RhoGTPase 介导的信号转导是指导二维培养的小鼠间充质干细胞(mMSCs)基因转移的关键参数,并且受细胞外基质蛋白的调节。在这项研究中,我们有兴趣确定与二维培养的细胞相比,阳离子聚合物介导的三维培养细胞中的基因转移是否通过不同的机制发生。特别是,我们研究了用于内化多聚物的内吞途径,以及细胞骨架动力学和 RhoGTPase 在二维和三维培养细胞中非病毒基因转移中的作用。网格蛋白和小窝介导的内吞作用的抑制导致三维培养的细胞总转基因表达的下降比二维培养的细胞更为明显。此外,只有当抑制网格蛋白介导的内吞作用时,多聚物的内化才会显著减少,而在二维培养的细胞中抑制小窝介导的内吞作用会导致最强的多聚物内化抑制。肌动蛋白和微管聚合对二维和三维转染的影响不同。微管解聚增强了二维培养中的转基因表达,但抑制了三维培养中的表达。最后,RhoGTPase 的抑制也对二维和三维转染有不同的影响。ROCK 效应物的抑制导致三维培养的细胞中转基因表达和内化的减少,但不影响二维培养的细胞,而 PAK1 效应物的抑制导致二维和三维培养的细胞中转基因表达的增加。总的来说,我们的研究表明,与二维培养的细胞相比,三维培养的细胞中的基因转移过程通过不同的机制发生。