• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Farr 放射免疫分析和 EliA 荧光免疫分析抗双链 DNA 在 SLE 加重中的变化。

Changes in Farr radioimmunoassay and EliA fluorescence immunoassay anti-dsDNA in relation to exacerbation of SLE.

机构信息

1Clinical Chemistry Laboratory.

出版信息

Lupus. 2013 Oct;22(11):1169-73. doi: 10.1177/0961203313500368. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1177/0961203313500368
PMID:23929638
Abstract

Measuring anti-dsDNA levels could support treatment adjustment during follow-up of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We investigated whether patients with exacerbations of SLE showed changes in anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) levels prior to the exacerbation using the Farr and EliA assay and examined which assay showed highest specificity and predictive value for exacerbations. Changes in anti-dsDNA of ≥ 25% prior to exacerbation were considered of clinical significance. Exacerbations were retrospectively abstracted from medical records. Eighteen of 48 patients showed one or more exacerbations. We found 22 exacerbations with complete lab work-up, all accompanied by ≥ 25% change in anti-dsDNA in one or both assays. Only 10 exacerbations showed concordant changes in anti-dsDNA in both assays. Changes in anti-dsDNA had a low predictive value for exacerbations of SLE, but the specificity of anti-dsDNA changes for patients with exacerbations was higher for EliA than Farr. We conclude that despite the limited relation between anti-dsDNA changes and exacerbations of SLE, anti-dsDNA testing could still support clinical decision making when used in the correct setting. We conclude that EliA is preferable over Farr for assaying anti-dsDNA during follow-up of patients with SLE because of higher specificity, less "hands-on" time and absence of radioactivity.

摘要

检测抗双链 DNA(anti-dsDNA)水平可能有助于在系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的随访中调整治疗方案。我们通过 Farr 和 EliA 检测法调查了 SLE 恶化的患者在恶化前的抗双链 DNA(anti-dsDNA)水平是否发生变化,并研究了哪种检测方法对恶化具有最高的特异性和预测价值。恶化前抗 dsDNA 水平变化≥25%被认为具有临床意义。我们从病历中回顾性地提取了恶化事件。48 名患者中有 18 名出现了一次或多次恶化。我们发现 22 次恶化伴有完整的实验室检查结果,所有恶化均伴有一项或两项检测中的抗 dsDNA 水平变化≥25%。只有 10 次恶化在两项检测中显示出抗 dsDNA 的一致性变化。抗 dsDNA 变化对 SLE 恶化的预测价值较低,但对于出现恶化的患者,EliA 检测法比 Farr 检测法的抗 dsDNA 变化的特异性更高。我们得出的结论是,尽管抗 dsDNA 变化与 SLE 恶化之间的相关性有限,但在正确的情况下,抗 dsDNA 检测仍可以支持临床决策。我们得出的结论是,由于特异性更高、操作时间更短且无放射性,在 SLE 患者的随访中,EliA 检测法优于 Farr 检测法,适用于抗 dsDNA 检测。

相似文献

1
Changes in Farr radioimmunoassay and EliA fluorescence immunoassay anti-dsDNA in relation to exacerbation of SLE.Farr 放射免疫分析和 EliA 荧光免疫分析抗双链 DNA 在 SLE 加重中的变化。
Lupus. 2013 Oct;22(11):1169-73. doi: 10.1177/0961203313500368. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
2
Auto-antibodies to double-stranded DNA as biomarker in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of different assays during quiescent and active disease.抗双链DNA自身抗体作为系统性红斑狼疮的生物标志物:静止期和活动期疾病不同检测方法的比较
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017 May 1;56(5):698-703. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew462.
3
Clinical disease activity and titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies measured by an automated immunofluorescence assay in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者中通过自动免疫荧光法测定的临床疾病活动度及抗双链DNA抗体滴度
Lupus. 2005;14(7):505-9. doi: 10.1191/0961203305lu2130oa.
4
Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.诊断系统性红斑狼疮:新一代免疫测定法用于检测抗 dsDNA 抗体是替代 Farr 技术和克氏锥虫免疫荧光试验的有效方法。
Lupus. 2010 Jul;19(8):906-12. doi: 10.1177/0961203310362995. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
5
Measurement of increases in anti-double-stranded DNA antibody levels as a predictor of disease exacerbation in systemic lupus erythematosus. A long-term, prospective study.测量抗双链DNA抗体水平升高作为系统性红斑狼疮疾病加重的预测指标。一项长期前瞻性研究。
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 May;33(5):634-43. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330505.
6
Changes in levels of antibodies against the 70 kDa and a polypeptides of the U1RNP complex in relation to exacerbations of systemic lupus erythematosus.与系统性红斑狼疮病情加重相关的针对U1RNP复合物70 kDa和a多肽抗体水平的变化。
J Rheumatol. 1991 Mar;18(3):363-7.
7
[Capacity to predict a recurrence of lupus erythematosus using double-stranded anti-DNA antibodies and Farr technique].[利用双链抗DNA抗体和法尔技术预测红斑狼疮复发的能力]
Rev Med Chil. 1999 Apr;127(4):411-20.
8
A comparison between the Farr radioimmunoassay and a new automated fluorescence immunoassay for the detection of antibodies against double stranded DNA in serum.法尔放射免疫测定法与一种新型自动化荧光免疫测定法在血清中双链DNA抗体检测方面的比较。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61(12):1099-102. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.12.1099.
9
BioPlex 2200 multiplexed system: simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.BioPlex 2200多重检测系统:系统性红斑狼疮患者中抗双链DNA和抗染色质抗体的同时检测。
Autoimmunity. 2009 Jan;42(1):63-8. doi: 10.1080/08916930802354906.
10
Clinical evaluation of a new automated anti-dsDNA fluorescent immunoassay.一种新型自动化抗双链DNA荧光免疫测定法的临床评估
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002 Oct;40(10):1056-60. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2002.185.

引用本文的文献

1
An Update on Antibodies to Necleosome Components as Biomarkers of Sistemic Lupus Erythematosus and of Lupus Flares.核小体成分自身抗体作为系统性红斑狼疮及狼疮活动的生物标志物的研究进展
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 18;20(22):5799. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225799.
2
Analytical variability in the determination of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies: the strong need of a better definition of the old and new tests.抗双链 DNA 抗体测定的分析变异性:对新旧检测方法进行更好定义的强烈需求。
Immunol Res. 2018 Jun;66(3):340-347. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-8992-9.
3
Predictive biological markers of systemic lupus erythematosus flares: a systematic literature review.
预测系统性红斑狼疮发作的生物学标志物:系统文献回顾。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2017 Oct 24;19(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1442-6.
4
Anti-DNA antibodies--quintessential biomarkers of SLE.抗 DNA 抗体——SLE 的标志性生物标志物。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;12(2):102-10. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.151. Epub 2015 Nov 19.