Harold Simmons Center for Kidney Disease Research and Epidemiology, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California;
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Oct;24(10):1678-87. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2013020123. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
Physician caseload may be a predictor of patient outcomes associated with various medical conditions and procedures, but the association between patient-physician ratio and mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis has not been determined. We examined whether a higher patient-nephrologist ratio affects patient mortality risk using de-identified data from DaVita dialysis clinics and the U.S. Renal Data System. A total of 41 nephrologists with a caseload of 50-200 hemodialysis patients from an urban California region were retrospectively ranked according to their hemodialysis patient mortality rate during a 6-year period between 2001 and 2007. We calculated all-cause mortality hazard ratios for each nephrologist and compared patient- and provider-level characteristics between the 10 nephrologists with the highest patient mortality rates and the 10 nephrologists with the lowest patient mortality rates. Nephrologists with the lowest patient mortality rates had significantly lower patient caseloads than nephrologists with the highest mortality rates (median [interquartile range], 65 [55-76] versus 103 [78-144] patients per nephrologist, respectively; P<0.001). Additionally, patients treated by nephrologists with the lowest patient mortality rates received higher dialysis doses, had longer sessions, and received more kidney transplants. In demographic characteristic-adjusted analyses, each 50-patient increase in caseload was associated with a 2% increase in patient mortality risk (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.04; P<0.001). Hence, these results suggest that nephrologist caseload influences hemodialysis patient outcomes, and future research should focus on identifying the factors underlying this association.
医师工作量可能是预测与各种医疗状况和程序相关的患者结局的一个指标,但患者与肾病医生的比例与接受血液透析患者的死亡率之间的关系尚未确定。我们使用来自 DaVita 透析诊所和美国肾脏数据系统的匿名数据,研究了较高的患者与肾病医生的比例是否会影响患者的死亡风险。总共 41 名肾病医生,其工作量为来自加利福尼亚州一个城市地区的 50-200 名血液透析患者,根据他们在 2001 年至 2007 年的 6 年期间的血液透析患者死亡率进行回顾性排名。我们为每位肾病医生计算了全因死亡率风险比,并比较了死亡率最高和最低的 10 名肾病医生的患者和提供者特征。死亡率最低的肾病医生的患者工作量明显低于死亡率最高的肾病医生(中位数[四分位间距],分别为 65[55-76]和 103[78-144]名患者/肾病医生;P<0.001)。此外,死亡率最低的肾病医生治疗的患者接受的透析剂量更高,治疗时间更长,接受的肾脏移植更多。在调整了人口统计学特征的分析中,工作量每增加 50 名患者,患者死亡风险就会增加 2%(风险比,1.02;95%置信区间,1.00 至 1.04;P<0.001)。因此,这些结果表明,肾病医生的工作量影响血液透析患者的结局,未来的研究应该集中在确定这种关联的基础因素上。