• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症患者的生存状况因健康保险状况而异。

Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status.

机构信息

Cancer Epidemiology Services, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ 08625, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2013 Jun;2(3):403-11. doi: 10.1002/cam4.84. Epub 2013 May 8.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.84
PMID:23930216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3699851/
Abstract

Previous studies found that uninsured and Medicaid insured cancer patients have poorer outcomes than cancer patients with private insurance. We examined the association between health insurance status and survival of New Jersey patients 18-64 diagnosed with seven common cancers during 1999-2004. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals for 5-year cause-specific survival were calculated from Cox proportional hazards regression models; health insurance status was the primary predictor with adjustment for other significant factors in univariate chi-square or Kaplan-Meier survival log-rank tests. Two diagnosis periods by health insurance status were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival log-rank tests. For breast, colorectal, lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), and prostate cancer, uninsured and Medicaid insured patients had significantly higher risks of death than privately insured patients. For bladder cancer, uninsured patients had a significantly higher risk of death than privately insured patients. Survival improved between the two diagnosis periods for privately insured patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer and NHL, for Medicaid insured patients with NHL, and not at all for uninsured patients. Survival from cancer appears to be related to a complex set of demographic and clinical factors of which insurance status is a part. While ensuring that everyone has adequate health insurance is an important step, additional measures must be taken to address cancer survival disparities.

摘要

先前的研究发现,没有保险和拥有医疗补助保险的癌症患者比拥有私人保险的癌症患者预后更差。我们研究了新泽西州在 1999 年至 2004 年间被诊断出患有七种常见癌症的 18-64 岁患者的健康保险状况与生存之间的关系。通过 Cox 比例风险回归模型计算出 5 年特定原因生存率的风险比(HRs)及其 95%置信区间;健康保险状况是主要预测因子,在单变量卡方检验或 Kaplan-Meier 生存对数秩检验中对其他重要因素进行了调整。通过 Kaplan-Meier 生存对数秩检验比较了两个诊断期的健康保险状况。对于乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌、非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)和前列腺癌,未参保和享受医疗补助保险的患者的死亡风险明显高于私人保险患者。对于膀胱癌,未参保患者的死亡风险明显高于私人保险患者。对于乳腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌和 NHL 的私人保险患者、NHL 的医疗补助保险患者,生存状况在两个诊断期之间有所改善,而未参保患者的生存状况则完全没有改善。癌症的生存状况似乎与一系列复杂的人口统计学和临床因素有关,其中保险状况是其中的一部分。尽管确保每个人都有足够的健康保险是一个重要步骤,但还必须采取其他措施来解决癌症生存差异问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ed/3699851/b4bff043a910/cam40002-0403-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ed/3699851/b4bff043a910/cam40002-0403-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ed/3699851/b4bff043a910/cam40002-0403-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cancer survival disparities by health insurance status.癌症患者的生存状况因健康保险状况而异。
Cancer Med. 2013 Jun;2(3):403-11. doi: 10.1002/cam4.84. Epub 2013 May 8.
2
Is There an Association Between Insurance Status and Survival and Treatment of Primary Bone and Extremity Soft-tissue Sarcomas? A SEER Database Study.保险状况与原发性骨和四肢软组织肉瘤的生存和治疗之间是否存在关联?一项 SEER 数据库研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):527-536. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000889.
3
Trends in Cancer Survival by Health Insurance Status in California From 1997 to 2014.1997 年至 2014 年加利福尼亚州按健康保险状况划分的癌症生存率趋势。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):317-323. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3846.
4
The impact of underinsurance on bladder cancer diagnosis, survival, and care delivery for individuals under the age of 65 years.保险不足对 65 岁以下人群膀胱癌诊断、生存和护理提供的影响。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):496-505. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32562. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Insurance status is related to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma survival.保险状况与弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的生存有关。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 15;120(8):1220-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28549. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
6
The relation between health insurance coverage and clinical outcomes among women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性的医疗保险覆盖范围与临床结局之间的关系。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Jul 29;329(5):326-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307293290507.
7
The effect of health insurance on childhood cancer survival in the United States.医疗保险对美国儿童癌症生存率的影响。
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123(24):4878-4885. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30925. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis.12种癌症确诊时保险状况及种族与癌症分期的关联:一项回顾性分析
Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):222-31. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70032-9. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
9
Relationship between Insurance Type at Diagnosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Survival.诊断时的保险类型与肝细胞癌生存率之间的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Feb;29(2):300-307. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0902. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
Insurance status, comorbidity level, and survival among colorectal cancer patients age 18 to 64 years in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年美国国家癌症数据库中18至64岁结直肠癌患者的保险状况、合并症水平及生存率
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8025. Epub 2009 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Beyond Barriers: Achieving True Equity in Cancer Care.突破障碍:实现癌症护理的真正公平。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 12;32(6):349. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060349.
2
Socioeconomic disparities and MIBC survival outcome-An analysis of a statewide cohort.社会经济差异与肌层浸润性膀胱癌生存结果——一项全州队列分析
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 2;43(1):349. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05722-1.
3
Community-level Social Vulnerability and Cervical Cancer Mortality Among Young and Old Adults in the State of Alabama.阿拉巴马州年轻人和老年人中社区层面的社会脆弱性与宫颈癌死亡率

本文引用的文献

1
Survival disparities by Medicaid status: an analysis of 8 cancers.按医疗补助状况划分的生存率差异:8 种癌症分析。
Cancer. 2012 Sep 1;118(17):4271-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27380. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
2
Thyroid cancer incidence in New Jersey: time trend, birth cohort and socioeconomic status analysis (1979-2006).新泽西州甲状腺癌发病率:时间趋势、出生队列和社会经济地位分析(1979-2006 年)。
J Environ Public Health. 2011;2011:850105. doi: 10.1155/2011/850105. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
3
Racial disparities in stage-specific colorectal cancer mortality rates from 1985 to 2008.
J Community Health. 2025 Jun 1. doi: 10.1007/s10900-025-01482-6.
4
Socioeconomic inequities in prostate cancer care: private versus public treatment settings pose a significant impact on overall survival.前列腺癌治疗中的社会经济不平等:私立与公立治疗环境对总体生存率有重大影响。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 2;23:eAO0851. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2025AO0851. eCollection 2025.
5
Structural Racism in Cervical Cancer Care and Survival Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Inequities and Barriers.宫颈癌护理与生存结果中的结构性种族主义:对不平等与障碍的系统评价
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00360-y. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
6
Patterns in Symptoms Preceding Acute Care in Patients With Cancer.癌症患者急性护理前的症状模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256366. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6366.
7
Association Between Medicaid Expansion and Insurance Status, Risk Group, Receipt, and Refusal of Treatment Among Men with Prostate Cancer.医疗补助扩大与前列腺癌男性患者的保险状况、风险组、治疗接受情况及拒绝治疗之间的关联
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;17(3):547. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030547.
8
Association between health insurance coverage and stage of diagnosis for cervical cancer among females in Indiana from 2011 - 2019.2011年至2019年印第安纳州女性医疗保险覆盖情况与宫颈癌诊断分期之间的关联
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jan 13;50:102975. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102975. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Medicaid coverage continuity is associated with lymphoma stage among children and adolescents/young adults.医疗补助覆盖的连续性与儿童、青少年及青年成年人的淋巴瘤分期相关。
Blood Adv. 2025 Jan 28;9(2):280-290. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013532.
10
Impact of insurance status on MRI phenotypes in MS.保险状况对多发性硬化症MRI表型的影响。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2024 Dec;92:105919. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105919. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
1985 年至 2008 年,种族差异对结直肠癌死亡率的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Feb 1;30(4):401-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.5527. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
4
Insurance status and racial differences in uterine cancer survival: a study of patients in the National Cancer Database.保险状况与子宫癌生存的种族差异:国家癌症数据库中患者的研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Jul;122(1):63-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
5
An official American Thoracic Society systematic review: insurance status and disparities in lung cancer practices and outcomes.美国胸科学会官方系统评价:保险状况与肺癌诊治及结局差异。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov 1;182(9):1195-205. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009-038ST.
6
Improved estimates of cancer-specific survival rates from population-based data.基于人群数据的癌症特异性生存率的改进估计。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Oct 20;102(20):1584-98. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq366. Epub 2010 Oct 11.
7
Insurance status and survival disparities among nonelderly rectal cancer patients in the National Cancer Data Base.国家癌症数据库中非老年直肠癌患者的保险状况与生存差异。
Cancer. 2010 Sep 1;116(17):4178-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25317.
8
Effects of socioeconomic status on colon cancer treatment accessibility and survival in Toronto, Ontario, and San Francisco, California, 1996-2006.1996-2006 年安大略省多伦多和加利福尼亚州旧金山的社会经济地位对结肠癌治疗可及性和生存的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):112-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.173112. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
9
Cancer survival disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status in New Jersey.新泽西州不同种族/族裔和社会经济地位的癌症生存率差异
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010 Feb;21(1):144-60. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0263.
10
The impact of health insurance status on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer.健康保险状况对头颈部癌症患者生存的影响。
Cancer. 2010 Jan 15;116(2):476-85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24774.