• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电化学技术用于基于茎环探针和线性探针的 DNA 传感器的特性描述。

Electrochemical techniques for characterization of stem-loop probe and linear probe-based DNA sensors.

机构信息

Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0304, USA.

出版信息

Methods. 2013 Dec 15;64(3):267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.041
PMID:23933234
Abstract

Here we present a summary of the sensor performance of the stem-loop probe (SLP) and linear probe (LP) electrochemical DNA sensors when interrogated using alternating current voltammetry (ACV), cyclic voltammetry (CV), and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). Specifically, we identified one critical parameter for each voltammetric technique that can be adjusted for optimal sensor performance. Overall, the SLP sensor displayed good sensor performance (i.e., 60+% signal attenuation in the presence of the target) over a wider range of experimental conditions when compared to the LP sensor. When used with ACV, the optimal frequency range was found to be between 5 and 5000 Hz, larger than the 5-100 Hz range observed with the LP sensor. A similar trend was observed for the two sensors in CV; the LP sensor was operational only at scan rates between 30 and 100 V/s, whereas the SLP sensor performed well at scan rates between 1 and 1000 V/s. Unlike ACV and CV, DPV has demonstrated to be a more versatile sensor interrogation technique for this class of sensors. Despite the minor differences in total signal attenuation upon hybridization to the target DNA, both SLP and LP sensors performed optimally under most pulse widths used in this study. More importantly, when used with longer pulse widths, both sensors showed "signal-on" behavior, which is generally more desirable for sensor applications.

摘要

在这里,我们总结了茎环探针 (SLP) 和线性探针 (LP) 电化学 DNA 传感器在交流伏安法 (ACV)、循环伏安法 (CV) 和差分脉冲伏安法 (DPV) 检测时的传感器性能。具体来说,我们确定了每种伏安技术的一个关键参数,可以根据需要进行调整以获得最佳的传感器性能。总的来说,与 LP 传感器相比,SLP 传感器在更宽的实验条件范围内显示出更好的传感器性能(即在存在靶标的情况下信号衰减超过 60%)。当与 ACV 一起使用时,发现最佳频率范围在 5 到 5000 Hz 之间,大于 LP 传感器观察到的 5-100 Hz 范围。这两种传感器在 CV 中的趋势类似;LP 传感器仅在扫描速率为 30 到 100 V/s 之间时才能工作,而 SLP 传感器在扫描速率为 1 到 1000 V/s 之间时表现良好。与 ACV 和 CV 不同,DPV 已被证明是此类传感器更通用的传感器检测技术。尽管在与靶 DNA 杂交后的总信号衰减存在微小差异,但 SLP 和 LP 传感器在本研究中使用的大多数脉冲宽度下都表现出最佳性能。更重要的是,当使用较长的脉冲宽度时,两种传感器都表现出“信号开启”行为,这通常更适合传感器应用。

相似文献

1
Electrochemical techniques for characterization of stem-loop probe and linear probe-based DNA sensors.电化学技术用于基于茎环探针和线性探针的 DNA 传感器的特性描述。
Methods. 2013 Dec 15;64(3):267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
2
Comparison of the stem-loop and linear probe-based electrochemical DNA sensors by alternating current voltammetry and cyclic voltammetry.基于茎环和线性探针的电化学 DNA 传感器的交流伏安法和循环伏安法比较。
Langmuir. 2011 Dec 6;27(23):14669-77. doi: 10.1021/la203015v. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
3
Characterization of an electrochemical mercury sensor using alternating current, cyclic, square wave and differential pulse voltammetry.采用交流、循环、方波和差分脉冲伏安法对电化学汞传感器进行表征。
Anal Chim Acta. 2014 Jan 31;810:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
4
Effect of signaling probe conformation on sensor performance of a displacement-based electrochemical DNA sensor.基于位移的电化学 DNA 传感器中信号探针构象对传感器性能的影响。
Anal Chem. 2013 Mar 19;85(6):3340-6. doi: 10.1021/ac3037987. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
5
Effect of redox label tether length and flexibility on sensor performance of displacement-based electrochemical DNA sensors.基于位移的电化学 DNA 传感器的氧化还原标记键合长度和柔性对传感器性能的影响。
Anal Chim Acta. 2014 Feb 17;812:176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.12.040. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
6
Application of electrochemical surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy for characterization of electrochemical DNA sensors.电化学表面等离子体共振光谱在电化学DNA传感器表征中的应用。
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014 Oct 1;122:835-839. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
7
Ultrasensitive electrochemical DNA sensor based on the target induced structural switching and surface-initiated enzymatic polymerization.基于目标诱导结构切换和表面引发酶聚合的超灵敏电化学 DNA 传感器。
Biosens Bioelectron. 2014 May 15;55:231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.077. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
8
Effects of probe length, probe geometry, and redox-tag placement on the performance of the electrochemical E-DNA sensor.探针长度、探针几何形状和氧化还原标记位置对电化学 E-DNA 传感器性能的影响。
Anal Chem. 2009 Mar 15;81(6):2150-8. doi: 10.1021/ac802317k.
9
Hexavalent Chromium as an Electrocatalyst in DNA Sensing.六价铬作为 DNA 传感中的电催化剂。
Anal Chem. 2017 Dec 19;89(24):13342-13348. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03514. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
10
Effect of diluent chain length on the performance of the electrochemical DNA sensor at elevated temperature.稀释剂链长对高温电化学 DNA 传感器性能的影响。
Analyst. 2011 Jan 7;136(1):134-9. doi: 10.1039/c0an00644k. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Future perspectives of GMO detection in agriculture: strategies for electrochemical nucleic acid detection.农业中转基因生物检测的未来展望:电化学核酸检测策略
Mikrochim Acta. 2025 Jun 26;192(7):457. doi: 10.1007/s00604-025-07267-x.
2
DNA nanotechnology for nucleic acid analysis: sensing of nucleic acids with DNA junction-probes.DNA 纳米技术在核酸分析中的应用:DNA 连接探针检测核酸。
Analyst. 2024 Jan 29;149(3):968-974. doi: 10.1039/d3an01707a.
3
Coordination Chemistry of Uranyl Ions with Surface-Immobilized Peptides: An XPS Study.
铀酰离子与表面固定化肽的配位化学:XPS 研究。
Molecules. 2022 Dec 16;27(24):8960. doi: 10.3390/molecules27248960.
4
Threonine Phosphorylation of an Electrochemical Peptide-Based Sensor to Achieve Improved Uranyl Ion Binding Affinity.基于电化学多肽传感器的苏氨酸磷酸化作用以提高铀酰离子结合亲和力。
Biosensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 2;12(11):961. doi: 10.3390/bios12110961.
5
Electrochemical Interrogation of G3-Poly(propylene thiophenoimine) Dendritic Star Polymer in Phenanthrene Sensing.菲咯啉传感中G3-聚(丙烯硫代苯亚胺)树枝状星形聚合物的电化学检测
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Sep 3;15(9):22343-63. doi: 10.3390/s150922343.