Suppr超能文献

电生理学鉴定内侧和外侧穿通路径传入齿状回的信息。

Electrophysiological identification of medial and lateral perforant path inputs to the dentate gyrus.

机构信息

Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, BC, Canada; Department of Biology, University of Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Neuroscience. 2013 Nov 12;252:154-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.063. Epub 2013 Aug 7.

Abstract

The medial perforant path (MPP) and lateral perforant path (LPP) inputs to the hippocampal dentate gyrus form two distinct laminar inputs onto the middle and distal aspects of granule cell dendrites. Previous evidence indicated that paired stimuli reliably produced paired-pulse depression (PPD) in the MPP and paired-pulse facilitation (PPF) in the LPP. Despite this, several years of practical experience in our laboratory questioned the utility of using paired-pulse administration to reliably differentiate the MPP and LPP in vitro. Using visualized field and whole-cell recordings in male Sprague-Dawley rats, we demonstrate that both pathways show net PPF of the excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) at 50-ms interpulse intervals. LPP afferents did reliably exhibit greater PPF than MPP afferents. Thus, the LPP reliably exhibits a greater paired-pulse ratio than the MPP. The magnitude of the paired-pulse ratio was reduced in both afferents by raising calcium levels or lowering the temperature of the recording chamber. PPD of MPP-evoked fEPSPs was only reliably detected at moderate to high stimulus intensities when population spike activity was evident. PPD was more evident in whole cell voltage clamp recordings but nonetheless was not completely diagnostic as PPD was occasionally observed with LPP stimulation as well. We found the MPP and LPP could be reliably identified using conventional microscopy with hippocampal slices, and that they could be distinguished through the analysis of evoked waveform kinetics. This work refines our knowledge of electrophysiological differences between MPP and LPP projections and will help to facilitate the selective activation of these pathways.

摘要

内侧穿通路径(MPP)和外侧穿通路径(LPP)向海马齿状回的输入在颗粒细胞树突的中间和远端形成两个不同的层状输入。先前的证据表明,成对刺激在 MPP 中可靠地产生成对脉冲抑制(PPD),在 LPP 中产生成对脉冲易化(PPF)。尽管如此,我们实验室多年的实践经验对使用成对脉冲给药来可靠地区分体外 MPP 和 LPP 的实用性提出了质疑。使用雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠的可视化场和全细胞记录,我们证明两条通路在 50-ms 脉冲间隔时均表现出兴奋性突触后电位(fEPSP)的净 PPF。LPP 传入神经确实比 MPP 传入神经表现出更大的 PPF。因此,LPP 确实表现出比 MPP 更大的成对脉冲比。在记录室的钙水平升高或温度降低的情况下,两种传入神经的成对脉冲比幅度都降低。只有在群体峰活动明显时,才可以在中等到高强度的刺激下可靠地检测到 MPP 诱发的 fEPSP 的 PPD。在全细胞电压钳记录中,PPD 更为明显,但仍然不能完全诊断,因为偶尔也会观察到 LPP 刺激时的 PPD。我们发现,使用海马切片的常规显微镜可以可靠地识别 MPP 和 LPP,并且可以通过分析诱发波形动力学来区分它们。这项工作细化了我们对 MPP 和 LPP 投射之间电生理差异的认识,并将有助于促进这些途径的选择性激活。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验